wealth, health & happiness Flashcards

1
Q

wealth & happiness

A
  • income small but robust predictor of life satisfaction (boyce et al., 2010)
  • losses loom larger than gains e.g. loss aversion
  • need to consider losses & gains in happiness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

prospect theory and loss aversions

A
  • losses have twice the impact on utility than equivalent gains
  • “losses loom larger than gains” (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

individual differences in loss aversion

boyce et al. (2015)

A
  • Loss aversion deemed universal in prospect theory
  • Conscientiousness, although usually adaptive, is also characterised by a rigidity of thought & obsessiveness
  • Might be particularly problematic when a desired outcome isn’t achieved or it lost
  • Conscientious inds place great value on economic outcomes
  • Conscientious inds put more effort into achieving their goals (Duckworth et al., 2007) the loss of that outcome might be appraised as due to lack of their own ability (stable and general cause of failure) as opposed to a lack of effort
  • –> losses should loom larger for those higher in conscientiousness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

personality, marriage & happiness

boyce et al. (2016)

A
  • pre-marriage personality to predict life satisfaction before & during marriage - SOEP
  • women: high C linked to increased satisfaction over the years of marriage (C inds place more value on relationship goals)
  • men: E associated wit increased satisfaction across marriage (linked to status), introversion for women
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

personality & job performance

A
  • cog function highly associated
  • C - +ve corr, as goal orientated
  • N - -ve corr, may be due to characteristics not relating to job performance directly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

personality & health

A
  • multiple facets in how we experience/interpret illness
  • subjective or objective markers
  • treatment & compliance
  • antimicrobial resistance
  • mortality & personality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

C & IQ survival curves

what do they show regarding personality & health?

A
  • C: gender diffs, men die sooner, effect of C similar across genders
  • low C pass away sooner (associated with greater risk taking), C protective factor against mortality
  • IQ: higher IQ protective factor against conditions???
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

N & survival curve

A
  • high N associated with sharp increase in mortality
  • why: indirect through impact N has on mental health, consequence of chronic illness…
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

traits & mortality

A

traits comparable to things governments are trying to prioritise e.g. obesity & binge drinking (personality as risk factor)

correlations with mortality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

traits & compliance

to taking meds

A
  • C: high find it easier to comply with treatments
  • bigger than some interventions
  • effect of interventions is about 1/2 effect of C e.g. beh interventions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

antibody response & traits

A
  • high antibody responses beneficial
  • high in N lower antibody responses
  • N deleterious factor in how we fight disease
  • may be mediated by effect ppl experience stress, related to antibodies as well
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

methods for health & disease & personality

symptom reporting

A
  • viral challenge studies
  • quasi-experiments
  • case control designs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

viral challenge studies

A
  • Expose 50% to a pathogen (usually common cold) & 50% to a placebo
  • Keep in isolation
  • Examine for 1-2 weeks
  • Randomised controlled trial
  • Can make causal inference - e.g. N increases symptom reporting
  • Often isn’t feasible
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

quasi-experiments

health, disease & personality

A
  • Examine ppl at high & low stress times
  • Usually done on same students during exams & vacation times
  • Compare effects of personality on stress
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

case control designs

health, disease & personality

A
  • Compare diff high stressed & low stressed groups
  • Systematically diff levels of stress & trait of interest
  • Num of other factors that needs to be considered
  • More difficult to make causal inferences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

outcomes of studies investigating health, disease & personality

A
  • disease verification
  • covariates
  • sub-clinical & clinical infection
  • counts or reactivity to antigen
17
Q

feldman et al. (1999)

personality & symptoms

A
  • viral challenge study
  • high N: report more symptoms & severity of symptoms regardless of whether they were ill
  • high O: report more symptoms only when objectively ill
  • C reported being ill & severity regardless of infection
  • E protective agaisnt objective & subjective reporting to disease in a linear pattern (related to better sleep, diet & lower cortisol)
18
Q

larsen (1992)

encoding/recall of symptoms & personality

A
  • encoding: record symptoms for 3 months
  • recall num & severity of symptoms retrospectively
  • high N: further symptoms at recall
  • retrospective bias
19
Q

pain & -ve affect

A
  • pain mediated by internal states & dispositions: depression, N, anxiety (catastrophising)
  • these all magnify expression of pain
  • can cause ppl to feel pain in absense of physical injury (neuropathic pain)
20
Q

pain and intelligence

A
  • cog epidemiology
  • IQ associated with better health
  • direct effects: longevity, risk of various kinds of disease, widespread pain
  • indirect effects: follow public health interventions, less likely to smoke
21
Q

chronic illness & IQ

james & ferguson (2019)

A
  • 3 waves of data: before, at, after diagnosis of arthritis
  • IQ protects against pain at diagnosis
  • depression risk factor but pain makes worse too
  • depression & pain affect future cog testing
22
Q

personality on coping with pain

connor-smith & flachsbart (2007)

A
  • E,C,O linked to engagement coping strategies e.g. problem solving, generally beneficial to health
  • N associated with disenfagement strategies e.g. substance use
23
Q

health behs & risks, link to personality

A
  • N: impulsiveness, risk taking when high emotions
  • E: exercise but risky sexual behs
  • O: drug taking but not drug dependence
  • A: peer pressure leading -ve things
  • C: treatment compliance
24
Q

IQ mechanisms & healthy behs & risk

A
  • physical & social disadvantage
  • physiological system integrity
  • health behs
  • entry to safe jobs
25
Q

impulsiveness

A
  • cross-personality construct
  • UPPS model
  • predicts num of psychiatric related difficulties
  • risk taking behs across early adulthood
26
Q

cross-personality construct

impulsiveness

A
  • E on eyseck
  • P&E on PEN
  • big 5: high N, low A, low C, high E
  • FFM: facet of N
27
Q

UPPS model

whiteside & lynam (2001) - impulsiveness

A
  • urgency, premeditation, perserverance, sensation seeking
  • urgency: strong emotions trigger risky behs, +ve/-ve
  • lack premediation: low C
  • lack of perseverence: low C
  • sensation seeking: high E
28
Q

impulsivity predicting num of psychiatric related difficulties

A
  • impulse control disorders e.g. pyromania, kleptomania
  • personality disorders e.g. borderline, antisocial
  • addictions: transition impulse –> compulse
29
Q

addictions & personality

A
  • drinking - low perserverance linked to amount drank, predicted by urgency
  • smoking - high E&N
  • beh addictions e.g. smartphone - -ve urgency
30
Q

gambling & personality

A
  • 0.5-1% disordered gambling
  • high N, lower A&C
  • high -ve urgency
  • lower premeditation
31
Q

addictive behs cluster - impulsivity

james et al. (2016)

A
  • gambling problem more likely to be: young, male, smokers, drinkers
  • all markers for impulsiveness
  • acts as a risk factor
  • acting without thinking, not being able to inhibit actions
32
Q

impulsivity & associative learning

james et al. (2016)

A
  • trained on slot machines - varied in payout rate & gaps between plays
  • extinction - no wins
  • continued gambling predicted by: payout (less reinforcement), depression (less depressed), impulsiveness (more impulsive)

things in brackets led to greater perserverence