Week 5 Flashcards

1
Q

Chapter 9

acquisition of memory

A

Information that the brain takes in at the time of the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Chapter 9

blind administrator

A

An administrator of a lineup who doesn’t know who the suspects in it are and therefore can’t influence a witness’s decision.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Chapter 9

DNA fingerprinting

A

Measuring and comparing the lengths of selected strands of DNA in chromosomes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Chapter 9

DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) testing

A

A test that can positively identify or exclude suspects when a perpetrator has left DNA on items traceable to an individual.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Chapter 9

Federal Rules of Evidence standard

A

The test of admissibility of DNA testing by considering whether the relevance of the evidence outweighs the tendency of the evidence to unfairly prejudice the defendant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Chapter 9

Frye plus standard

A

The test of admissibility that requires showing not only general acceptance of DNA theory, but also that “the testing laboratory in the particular case performed the accepted scientific techniques in analyzing forensic samples.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Chapter 9

Frye standard

A

The rule that DNA evidence is admissible if the technique is “sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Chapter 9

Lineup

A

Identification procedure in which the suspect stands in a line/group with other individuals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Chapter 9

might-or-might-not-be-present instruction

A

Instructions to witnesses before they view a lineup that a culprit might or might not be in it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Chapter 9

per se approach

A

An approach to determining the constitutionality of an identification which focuses on the procedures employed by officials. It requires the exclusion of out-of-court identification evidence, without regard to its reliability, whenever it was obtained through unnecessarily suggestive procedures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Chapter 9

photo identification

A

Procedure in which the witness tries to pick the suspect from one or more photos.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Chapter 9

photo lineup

A

An identification procedure in which more than one photo is shown to a witness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Chapter 9

photo show-up

A

An identification procedure in which only one photo is shown to a witness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Chapter 9

preponderance of the evidence

A

A standard requiring the party who has the burden of proof to prove that something is more likely than not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Chapter 9

recall

A

Information about an event retrieved from a witness’s memory at the time of a later identification procedure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Chapter 9

recognition

A

Eyewitnesses to a crime are shown persons or objects and then asked to indicate whether they were involved in the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Chapter 9

retention of memory

A

Information the brain stores between the time of the crime and the lineup, show-up, or picture identification.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Chapter 9

retrieval of memory

A

Information retrieved from memory at the time of the lineup, show-up, or picture identification.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Chapter 9

sequential presentation

A

Officials present members of a lineup to witnesses one at a time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Chapter 9

show-up

A

A procedure in which the witness tries to match the suspect with one other person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Chapter 9

simultaneous presentation

A

Officials present members of a lineup to a witness at the same time, standing together.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Chapter 9

suggestion

A

The interpretation of events shaped by other people’s influence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Chapter 9

totality of circumstances approach

A

Weighing all of the facts surrounding the government’s establishing identification of the suspect to determine if it’s reliable enough to be admitted; also called the per se approach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Chapter 9

unnecessarily and impermissibly suggestive

A

Circumstances under which, if proven by a preponderance of the evidence, a lineup, show-up, or photographic array can be thrown out of court as evidence as a violation of due process.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Chapter 9

very substantial likelihood of misidentification

A

Circumstances under which, if proven by a preponderance of the evidence, a lineup, show-up, or photographic array can be thrown out of court as evidence as a violation of due process.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Chapter 10

affirmative defence

A

A defense in which defendants must introduce evidence in their favor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Chapter 10

amicus curiae brief

A

An argument submitted by a party that has a strong interest in a case but is not party to it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Chapter 10

attenuation exception

A

The exception to the exclusionary rule that says illegally obtained evidence can be admitted if the poisonous connection between illegal police actions and the evidence they got from their actions is weak enough.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Chapter 10

bad methods

A

Police actions and procedures to obtain evidence that violate the Constitution.

30
Q

Chapter 10

case-in-chief

A

The part of the trial where the government presents its evidence to prove the defendant’s guilt.

31
Q

Chapter 10

collateral proceedings

A

Proceedings that are “off to the side” of the main case.

32
Q

Chapter 10

constitutional right justification

A

The idea that the exclusionary rule is an essential part of constitutional rights.

33
Q

Chapter 10

defense of entrapment

A

The defense under which persons charged with what would ordinarily clearly be a crime are found not guilty because law enforcement had excessively encouraged the persons to commit the crimes.

34
Q

Chapter 10

deterrence justification

A

The justification that excluding evidence obtained in violation of the Constitution prevents illegal law enforcement.

35
Q

Chapter 10

exclusionary rule

A

The rule that illegally seized evidence cannot be admitted in criminal trials.

36
Q

Chapter 10

fruit-of-the-poisonous-tree doctrine

A

The principle that evidence derived from illegally obtained sources is not admissible.

37
Q

Chapter 10

good evidence

A

Evidence that helps prove a defendant committed a crime.

38
Q

Chapter 10

impeach

A

To undermine the believability of a witness’s testimony.

39
Q

Chapter 10

independent source exception

A

The exception to the exclusionary rule where police violate the constitution trying to obtain evidence but in a separate action, aside from the illegal one, lawfully get the same evidence.

40
Q

Chapter 10

inevitable discovery exception

A

The exception to the exclusionary rule that allows the admission of illegally obtained evidence if the government would have eventually obtained the evidence by legal means anyway.

41
Q

Chapter 10

judicial integrity justification

A

The idea that the honor and honesty of the courts justify the exclusionary rule.

42
Q

Chapter 10

objective test of entrapment

A

The test of entrapment that focuses on the actions of government agents to induce defendants to commit crimes.

43
Q

Chapter 10

probative evidence

A

Evidence that proves or helps prove defendants committed the crime

44
Q

Chapter 10

prophylactic rule

A

A protective procedure against violations of constitutional rights.

45
Q

Chapter 10

reasonable good-faith exception

A

Allows the government to use evidence obtained by police acting pursuant to warrants, later found to be defective, if the police honestly and reasonably believed the warrants were lawful.

46
Q

Chapter 10

subjective test of entrapment

A

The test of entrapment that focuses on the predisposition of defendants to commit crimes.

47
Q

Chapter 11

absolute immunity

A

The absence of liability for actions within the scope of duties.

48
Q

Chapter 11

blue curtain

A

The “barrier” that keeps police conduct from being exposed to police view and scrutiny.

49
Q

Chapter 11

civil action

A

A non-criminal case.

50
Q

Chapter 11

Civil Rights Act actions

A

Actions under federal law against state and local officers for violations of their civil rights.

51
Q

Chapter 11

constitutional tort (Bivens) actions

A

Lawsuits against federal officers for violations of federal constitutional rights.

52
Q

Chapter 11

damages

A

A remedy in private lawsuits in the form of money for injuries.

53
Q

Chapter 11

defense of official immunity

A

The rule that limits the liability of individual criminal justice personnel if sued for willful or malicious wrongdoing when they are acting within the exercise of their discretion.

54
Q

Chapter 11

defense of vicarious official immunity

A

The rule that allows police departments and local governments to claim the official immunity of their employees.

55
Q

Chapter 11

doctrine of respondeat superior

A

The rule that sets a superior as liable for a subordinate’s torts within the scope of employment.

56
Q

Chapter 11

doctrine of sovereign immunity

A

The notion that government cannot be sued without its consent.

57
Q

Chapter 11

en banc review

A

A review of a case by all of the appellate court judges as opposed to a review by a panel of three judges.

58
Q

Chapter 11

external civilian review

A

Review of police misconduct complaints by individuals outside the police department.

59
Q

Chapter 11

Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) actions

A

Lawsuits against the federal government for its officers’ constitutional torts.

60
Q

Chapter 11

functional immunity

A

The prosecutor’s immunity from a civil lawsuit depends on the function they performed at the time of their misconduct.

61
Q

Chapter 11

“good faith” defense

A

Another name for qualified immunity.

62
Q

Chapter 11

internal affairs units (IAU)

A

The group within a police department which reviews complaints of police officer misconduct.

63
Q

Chapter 11

no-affirmative-duty-to-protect rule

A

The rule that bars suits against individual officers or governments for failing to stop private people from violating the rights of other private citizens.

64
Q

Chapter 11

plaintiffs

A

Parties who bring a civil action.

65
Q

Chapter 11

qualified immunity

A

Immunity from tort action that is granted if a party was acting reasonably within the scope of duties.

66
Q

Chapter 11

1983 actions

A

An action brought under the Civil Rights Act, U.S. Code section 1983, for violation of federal civil rights under color of state law.

67
Q

Chapter 11

special relationship exception

A

The exception that says when government takes people into custody, it affirmatively creates a duty to protect them from harm by other citizens.

68
Q

Chapter 11

state-created-danger exception

A

A narrow exception in some states to the no-duty-to-protect rule.

69
Q

Chapter 11

summary judgment

A

A motion that the court enter a judgment without a trial because there’s not enough evidence to support the plaintiff’s claim.

70
Q

Chapter 11

torts

A

Civil damages.