Week 6 Flashcards
1
Q
Morphology (form and structure)
A
- anthropomorphic (human form)
- Zoomorphic (animal form)
- Caricatured (a non-humanoid robot that can show simplified humanoid motions in exaggerated ways)
- Functional
2
Q
Different kinds of robot - terminology
A
- humanoid = body shape similar to a human
- android = robot with human appearance (but not that of a specific individual)
- geminoid = robot is built to resemble a specific human individual
3
Q
Social robots challenging communication science
A
- challenging the notion of communicator
- challenging the notion of medium
- challenging the boundaries of communication
4
Q
Fields of use for social robots
A
- health care for the elderly
- interaction with children with autism spectrum disorder (less intimidating, less overwhelming, less judgemental)
- telerobotics
- education
- shopping mall guides
5
Q
Classes of social robots
A
- Socially evocative = rely on the human tendency to anthropomorphize and capitalize on feelings
- Sociable = proactively engage with humans
- Socially situated = surrounded by a social environment that they perceive and react to
- Socially intelligent = show aspects of human style social intelligence
6
Q
Socially interactive robots
A
- social interaction plays a roll
- exhibit the following characteristics:
a. express and perceive emotions
b. communicate with high-level dialogue
c. learn/recognize other agents
d. establish/maintain social relationships
e. use natural cues (gaze, gestures)
f. exhibit distinctive personality/character
g. may lean/develop social competencies
7
Q
Approaches to social interaction with robots
A
- robot-centered view
- human-centered view
- robot cognition-centered view
8
Q
Robot design (general)
A
- perception (sensing environment)
- cognition (planning, deciding)
- action (mobility, manipulation)
- human-robot interaction (interface, input devices, feedback devices)
- architecture (control, electromechanics)
9
Q
Robot design (specific to social robots)
A
- perceiving humans (detecting gestures, monitoring human actions)
- natural HRI (human and robot should communicate like peers and follow the same social conventions)
- readable social cues (robot must send comprehensible cures to human allow human to interact and understand robot’s internal states)
- real-time performance (robots must interact at human interaction rates)
10
Q
Concept and theories (selection)
A
- The uncanny valley = explains feelings of discomfort and unease toward close-to human robots
- Media equation / CASA = individuals treat computers as social actors
- Anthropomorphism = the tendency of humans to anthropomorphize objects
- Mind perception = not all reactions to robots are mindless
- Emotional attachment to robots = psychically present robots are seen as more real
- Embodiment = establish mutual perturbation between system and environment
11
Q
Human-robot interaction and CMC difference
A
- Humanoid social robots differ from CMC technologies in that they are not a medium through which humans interact, but rather a medium with which humans interact
- Humanoid social robots are not user-friendly computers that operate as machines: rather, they are user-friendly computers that operate as humans
12
Q
Commonalities between human-robot-interaction (HRI) and human-human interaction (HHI)
A
- Linguistically based: the skills of communication
- Relationality: use of personal pronouns
- Normative: follow social conventions such as politeness norms
13
Q
Differences between HRI and HHI
A
- interpretative asymmetry = HHI is only meaningful for the human
- resistiveness = not domain-restricted for humans
- indexical nature of communication = only humans can derive meaning of an expression from a particular situation
14
Q
Potential consequences for cognitive development
A
- improved learning
- personalized to child
- self-learning robot teacher - educational bubbles
- knowledge fragmentation
- lost in abundance
15
Q
Potential consequences for relational development
A
- complementarization
- compensation for deficiencies in human-human relationships
- functional diversification of relationships - replacement
- internalization of master-servant relationship
- loss of relational authenticity