writers Flashcards

1
Q
  • Risk profiling allows the WoT to be fought pre-emptively
  • Biometrics allow the ‘unruly body’ to be brought into zone of calculation and manageability
  • For people deemed low risk, biometrics makes the border seem even more invisible; for those considered high risk, it makes the border seem more present than ever as they are subject to invasive surveillance
  • Biometrics can be seen as embracing the technologies of globalisations to tackle the risks of globalisation
  • Data derivatives created by algorithms which assign risk scores to individuals
  • Risk profiling a means of governing mobility in the WoT, segregating legitimate mobilities from illegitimate mobilities
A

Amoore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  • “Risk-based calculative models and practices are emerging as a key means of identifying vulnerable spaces and suspicious populations in the war on terror.”
  • Automated targeting System used to identify unknown threats at borders, using commercial data and public data
  • “Risk in this sense is categorically not about reducing risk, achieving control, or even about ensuring safety or security—what matters instead is that the appearance of securability and manageability is sustained”
  • ‘petty sovereigns’ ie immigration officials, mid-level bureaucracies can make decisions with some objectivity and scientific certainty by using new technologies and alliances with experts
  • Risk management is “a particular mode of governing - a means of making an uncertain and unknowable future amenable to intervention and management”
A

Amoore and de Goede

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  • Bush administration used language to place Iraq at centre of WoT despite concrete evidence
  • The ‘war’ on terror provided a legal justification for military action and ensured public support
  • Terrorists treated as soldiers and given sense of legitimacy
A

Andreani

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
  • For risk society theorists, control is ideological and impossible to achieve so states must feign control over the uncontrollable
  • Risk is a dispositf, ie a heterogenous assemblage of discursive and material elements for governing social problems
  • Precautionary measures include extensive surveillance which often involves profiling of certain groups
  • The exception: an explanatory tool of changes in law/governance rather than a problem that needs to be unpacked
  • Doctrine of preemption continually drives expansion of governance, surveillance and interference in greater areas of social life
A

Aradau and van Munster

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  • Terrorism made governable by discourses of threat and danger, and arrangement of objects
  • Discourses function through language but also have rea, material effects in the world
A

Aradau et al.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  • Terrorists not financially motivated and attacks do not cost much, so freezing their assets not an effective strategy
  • General lack of knowledge how to tackle terrorism so finance route chosen
  • US cannot monitor all transactions so profiling used to target certain groups
  • Muslim money placed in space of exception
A

Atia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  • Surveillance embedded into everyday life so people take it for granted, consider it unremarkable
  • Snowden’s revelations not a concern for most people
  • Fear utilised so public accept mass surveillance
  • People willingly participate in surveillance because it is fun or convenient
A

Bauman et al.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
  • “the hidden central issue in world risk society is how to feign control over the uncontrollable”
  • Risks characterised by unpredictability, incalculability and uncontrollability
  • Risks exacerbated by globalisation
  • Global terror, climate change and economic meltdown constitute ‘triple axis of world risk society’
A

Beck

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
  • Governments use logic of the exception to justify implementing extreme liberty restrictions in name of security
  • Surveillance is justified in that terrorism restricts liberties, but it guilty of this itself
  • In the interest of collective security, people sacrifice their liberties to religion, speech and movement
A

Bigo and Walker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
  • Performativity involves a series of performances, discursive practices that produce and reproduce over and again a series of effects
  • In any discursive practice, it is always the repetition of prior established norms that mark the subject, and condition and shape the particular reality that is foregrounded
A

Butler

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
  • Terrorist financing as reverse money laundering, where legitimate money is acquired and then funnelled to support terrorism
  • Methods used to prosecute drug lords for money laundering in war on drugs not applicable to WoT
A

Casella

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  • Most counter-terrorism policies have failed to address problem because policy makers do not understand causes
  • Economic globalisation has furthered the West at the expense of the developing world, leading to feelings of alienation and disenfranchisement which could fuel terrorism
  • US needs to understand complex causes of terrorism to produce more sophisticated responses
A

Cronin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  • The same aspects of globalisation that contribute to security threats also offer new opportunities for economic growth and democracy
  • Counterproliferation measures focus on military action but also include diplomacy, multilateral regimes, threat reductions programs and controls on exports
  • Traditional methods of controlling risks needs to be adapted to a globalised world
A

Davis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
  • Anticipatory security more interested in pinpointing potential dangers rather than monitoring everyone
  • Hawala constructed as dark and underground to make Western banking practices seem legitimate
  • Closure of Al-Barakat devastating for Somali economy
  • Pre-emption not about predicting the future but about speculating multiple futures
A

de Goede

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
  • Pre-emptive strategies have made their way into routine security practice and bureaucratic operations
  • Risk management is performative; it does not pre-exist its practice
  • A security of the interstice aims to fills gaps between spaces of governance
A

de Goede et al.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

• “Precaution starts when decisions must be made by reason of and in the context of scientific uncertainty. Decisions are therefore made not in a context of uncertainty, nor even of available knowledge, but of doubt, suspicion, premonition, foreboding, challenge, mistrust, fear, and anxiety. There is to some extent a risk beyond risk of which we do not have, nor cannot have, the knowledge or the measure”

A

Ewald

17
Q
  • Discourses a set of images, vocabularies and material conditions that expresses prevailing truths about the world and positions subjects accordingly
  • No truth or knowledge outside of power – the three are relationally connected
  • Power organises subjects, objects and meanings into a seemingly unquestionable reality or truth to the exclusion of other possible realities
  • Governmentality – involves the government of the self and others; directing, managing and regulating of behaviours
  • Governmentality renders individuals and society knowable and governable
  • Subjects galvanised to play active role in their own self-regulation and self-government
A

Foucault

18
Q
  • Iraq first war justified by intelligence
  • Secret services produced poor intelligence that fit narrative promoted by Bush administration
  • Government needed to exaggerate intelligence to gain public support
A

Freedman

19
Q
  • WoTpart of a longer term plan for the US to reassert their declining political and social power, 9/11 provided justification for this
  • The government politicised fear as a way to impose authoritarianism
  • The WoT a clever rhetorical device
A

Gills

20
Q

• “Command and control, ways of seeing, and anxiety all contribute to the power relations of counterinsurgency that are shaping the international.”

A

Grayson

21
Q

elimination
• Iraq more preventive than pre-emptive because Saddam did not pose imminent threat
• Policy-makers more concerned with possibilities rather than correctly assessing probabilities and intentions
• Success in risk management concerned with avoiding negative outcomes rather than chasing positive outcomes
• Difficult for public to see success since it is low-key and unpublicized so less visible
• 9/11 consolidated new security paradigm
• Threats used to come from great powers but now from failed, destabilised states and non-state actors
• In the Cold War the US had ‘ontological security’ but now threats to its national security are unpredictable, must prepare itself for a wide variety of challenges
• Globalisation exacerbates pre-existing risks of terrorism but is not responsible alone
• Risks are phenomena that have the potential to deliver substantial harm, regardless of the probability

A

Heng

22
Q
  • Declaring war creates a war psychosis and is counterproductive to objectives, may bolster the enemy, creates expectation of military action
  • Effective response required patience, but this was overlooked in panic and frenzy
  • The WoT likely to alienate people around the world, potentially causing more terrorism and extending the conflict
A

Howard

23
Q
  • The WoT a set of institutional practices and a discursive project
  • The physical practice of the war sustained through language and discourse
  • 9/11 attacks constructed using historical analogies and metaphors of good vs evil
  • Danger discourse used to invoke fear and panic, securing public support for extreme response
  • By asserting the war on terror as a new and different war, US treatment of these new and different enemies could be excused
A

Jackson

24
Q
  • New wars characterised by new militaries and new forms of violence
  • In Afghanistan and Iraq, old war thinking greatly exacerbated what turned out to be, in many ways, archetypal new wars
A

Kaldor

25
Q
  • In 1990s, flow of capital and people encouraged but post-9/11 effort made to restrict movement of ‘risky’ things
  • Increased security and monitoring, and open borders/free markets based on same political-economic imaginary
  • Imaginary - the way imagination figures in the construction of central social institutions, representations and practices
  • The same technologies and open borders that allow economic globalisation also allow terrorism
  • The idea of globalisation is one of the biggest driving factors
A

Larner

26
Q

• Surveillance has shifted from discipline to control, as technological developments has allowed the surveillance of all rather than a specific set of people

A

Lyon

27
Q
  • Normal acts and objects securitised sine 9/11 eg water bottles, backpacks
  • Mobilisation of public as vigilant and responsible
  • Difficult to get public to accept new ontologies of certain objects
  • Certain employees must adapt security practices in light of transformed ontologies
A

Neyland

28
Q
  • The WoT an example of a new practice of pre-emptive security
  • Bush applies pre-emption unevenly; he ignores Kyoto protocol but applies precaution to security policy
A

Rasmussen

29
Q
  • Iraq war failed because it boosted Al-Qaeda, caused the US to lose credibility and allowed Taliban to regroup in Afghanistan
  • More sophisticated responses that focus less on military control will need to be developed to cope with future security challenges, need to look at causes rather than how to control
A

Rogers

30
Q
  • Airports a source of anxiety and interrogation for members of profiled groups
  • Airports a heterotopia, designed to subdue resistance
  • Airports represent the policing power of the state, they present immobility and mobility, stagnancy as efficiency and incarceration as freedom
  • The popular imaginary – “non-elite international epistemology and ontology – how the multitude comes to authenticate knowledge about the world and the possibility for values within that world”
A

Salter

31
Q
  • 9/11 a crime against humanity, not an act of war
  • Development aid a more effective response to terrorism than military action
  • The US should work multilaterally and within a legal framework
A

Schrodt and Gerner

32
Q
  • Orange jumpsuit used to minimise or erase differences in the group
  • Aligned itself with US prison system to place Guantanamo as unexceptional
  • Orange jumpsuit as an icon of protest
A

van Veeren

33
Q
  • Citizens exchange liberties for increased security and also accept responsibility to contribute to security of the state
  • Operation TIPS attempted to mobilise workers as informants of suspicious behaviour
  • Increase in data collection has actually helped to conceal suspicious behaviour
A

Vlcek

34
Q
  • Drones ideal for immigration and border control
  • Drones tend to lump innocents together with terrorists
  • Killing people via drones becomes a routinised, banal procedure
  • Virtuous warfare – idea that US technology and techniques so much more accurate and humane
  • Definition of imminent threat expanded under use of drones
A

Wall and Monahan

35
Q
  • Actionism - US decides to act or undertake rather than not acting or undertaking
  • “The project of maintaining, or at least appearing to maintain, control, is central to a wide range of cultures of masculinity”
  • Actionism narrows range of acceptable decisions
A

Hannah