zimbardo Flashcards

1
Q

how long was the study planned to take, when was it cancelled and why?

A
  • planned to take two weeks.
  • cancelled 6 days in due to concerns about participants’ mental health.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

why does zimbardo’s own data not support his claim that people perform social roles?

A
  • only one third of participants assigned guard displayed aggression.
  • prisoners attempted rebellion.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what did the stanford prison experiment set out to test?

A
  • if the high levels of aggression in american prisons is due to conformity to social roles.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

why do zimbardo’s (and asch and milgram’s) studies suffer from gender bias?

A
  • only used males.
  • assumed data would be same for females.
  • women may have responded differently if tested.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is another explanation (not conformity to social roles) for the behaviour observed in the SPE?

A
  • prisoners and guards were play-acting according to TV stereotypes of prison roles, which could of been due to demand characteristics.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what does it mean to say zimbardo played a “dual role”?

A
  • both the head investigator and the prison superintendent; resulted in loss of objectivity and likely resulted in psychological harm for participants.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what about american prisons today may mean that zimbardo’s study may have failed?

A
  • still as aggressive.
  • unlikely SPE had any real-word impact.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

why is the sample in the SPE considered “volunteer”?

A
  • participants spotted advertisement in newspaper and put themselves forward.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

SPE is considered unethical; if it was to be repeated, who would authorise a replication, and how would they decide?

A
  • ethics committee.
  • base their decision on a cost-benefit analysis, weighing up harms to potential benefits to society.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

briefly describe the conclusions of the SPE.

A
  • situational environments (such as prisons) can radically alter the behaviour of previously stable individuals.
  • due to individuals changing to conform to socially defined roles.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

briefly describe the findings of the SPE.

A
  • prisoners and guards conformed to social roles quickly.
  • after two days, prisoners revolted against poor treatment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is an alternate explanation for the aggression in american prisons?

A
  • violent offenders bringing aggression to prison and officers needing to use aggression as a required method of controlling dangerous individuals.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

briefly describe the method of the SPE.

A
  • volunteers assessed as mentally stable randomly assigned as prisoners or guards.
  • prisoners given realistic arrests at home and fingerprinted, stripped, deloused and given uniforms with number.
  • guards given complete control along with uniforms, mirrored shades, clubs and handcuffs.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly