1 Flashcards

(153 cards)

1
Q

what is epizootiology

A

science of distribution of disease and factors related to health, as well as application of knowledge in disease prevention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

division of study according to data collection

A

interventional (clinical trial) and observational

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

division of study in relation to time

A

retrospective, prospective and mixed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

surveillance data

A

classic observation of population and measurement of certain characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

research data

A

comparison of two or more groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

describe cross sectional study

A

prevalence research - random sample in a certain time
odds ratio (exposed v non exposed)
pro = simple and cheap
con = provides only estimation of prevalence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

describe case control study

A

analyses relation between certain condition (disease) with specific cause
2 groups - animals selected based on health status - diseased and healthy and compare based on previous exposure RETROSPECTIVE study
pro = cheap and fast, good for rare diseases with low incidence, can study many risk factors retrospectively
con = no data given on incidence, heavily depends on sample quality, difficult to find good controls
calculate odds ratio

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

describe cohort study

A

compares incidence between groups over certain time period
prospective - condition is not present at start of research -concurrent
retrospective - records on previous exposure to risk factor and traced to present - non-concurrent
observes exposure
pro = monitoring over prolonged period, evaluation of incidence
con = expensive, long studies, rare, difficult follow up and sporadic diseases
can calculate incidence, incidence rate, reactive risk and attributable risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

general considerations for cohort study

A

cohorts must be free from disease under study
both study and control groups should be equally susceptible to disease under study
both groups should be comparable in respect to all possible variables
diagnostic and eligibility criteria of disease must be defined beforehand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

features of cohort study

A

relative risk will give you causal relationship between disease and exposure
attributable risk measures the change of incidence due to exposure in question
identification of exposures and risk factors for a disease forms basis for prevention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

measures of relation

A

cohort - relative risk, odds ratio
case-control - odds ratio of exposed
cross-section - odds ratio of prevalence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

bias

A

selection, misclassification, confounding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

experimental study

A

studies the impact of certain drugs/procedures on the course of diseases or its onset

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

experimental study design

A

similar to cohort
risk factor yes or no = treatment and control
study differences between cohorts
compare treatments and interventions
more comparisons possible 3-4 groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

life cycle of F.magna

A

liver fluke - miracidum - redia - redia and cercaria - cercaria - metacercária

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

definition of epidemiology

A

the study of diseases in population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

descriptive epidemiology answers the questions…

A

what caused the disease, where, when, in which population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

analytical epidemiology answers the questions

A

how and why - hypothesis testing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

intrinsic host determinants

A

species, breed, age, sex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

extrinsic determinants

A

climate, soils, man

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what do Kochs postulates describe

A

causality between a causative organism and subsequent disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

an organism is causal if

A

it has to be present in every organism
it has to be isolated and grown in pure culture
it has to cause the same disease in other susceptible animals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

why are kochs postulates not fully adequate in all cases?

A

weren’t applicable to non infectious diseases
they ignored interactions between infectious agents, hosts genes and environment in diseases with a multifactorial cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

what came after kochs postulates

A

evans postulates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
surveillance
the systematic ongoing collection, collation and analysis of information related to animal health and the timely dissemination of information so that action can be taken
26
passive surveillance
collect animal health data and information from disease reporting stakeholders
27
active surveillance
epidemiological information collected through purposeful and planned interventions
28
syndromic surveillance
based on observation of main signs of the disease
29
clinical surveillance
investigate the occurrence of diseases based on observation of clinical signs
30
targeted surveillance
active surveillance based on occurrence of disease in a given area and/or species
31
risk based surveillance
active surveillance that focuses on a certain area or livestock population based on perceived level of threat, risk and/or consequences
32
participatory disease surveillance
active surveillance that uses participatory approaches in search of disease, including input from local livestock producers and others in lifestock value chain
33
epidemiological unit
group of animals with a defined relationship sharing common likelihood of exposure to a disease
34
predisposing factors
variety of situations that harbour or promote disease
35
risk mapping
tool used for identification, assessment, communication and mitigation of a disease in a certain geographical area
36
zero reporting
periodic standard reports noting that surveillance in any form for a given disease has been carried out and no disease occurrence has been encountered
37
what is a sample
a smaller but hopefully still representative collection of units from a population used to determine truths about that population
38
what does sample size depend on
prevalence
39
probability (random) samples
systematic random sample stratified random sample cluster sample
40
non probability samples
convenience sample purposive sample quota
41
simple random sample
population is 10 sample is 5 each animal
42
systematic random sample
population 10 sample is 5 take every second animal (10/5) if fraction of 1-50 animals, we can pick a number eg 7and pick animals 57, 107, 157 etc
43
stratified random sampling
herd of 20, split in to breeds. take random sample from each breed
44
benefits of stratified random sampling
reduces variance increases precision
45
cluster sampling
split target population in to clusters - eg a sow with her litter if we want to estimate prevalence of E.coli in 90 piglets, we need to sample 30 piglets so 30/10 - we need to pick 3 clusters randomly
46
multistage sampling
randomly selected 5 sows randomly select 6 piglets from 1 cluster
47
clusters can be
natural - herd, litter artificial - areas, administrative units
48
to pick sample size we have to consider
how many animals should be considered to obtain representative results desired precision probability or confidence that our results will be acceptable for population
49
estimation of sample size
n = z2 Pexp (1-Pexp) / d2 n = sample size Pexp = expected prevalence d = precision z = factor that determine confidence levels ( 95% - 1.96)
50
estimation for small population
nadj = (Nxn) / (N+n) n = sample size for large population N = sample size of analysed population
51
qualitative data
categorical, can't be counted, measured or easily expressed as numbers eg breed, sex
52
quantitative data
information that can be expressed in numbers or quantified eg body weight, milk production, body temperature etc
53
discrete data
type of quantitative can't be made more precise eg number of pets (can't have 1.4 animals)
54
continuous data
type of quantitative can be divided and reduced to finer numbers eg height can be in m, cm, mm etc
55
qualitative scales
nominal - no quantitative value eg sex, location ordinal - variable measurement eg satisfaction, degree of pain
56
continuous scales
interval - order of variables and difference between variables known eg body temp ratio - order of variable and makes a difference between variables
57
static measures
proportion and ratio
58
proportion is
a fraction in which numerator is included in the denominator dimensionless, from 0-1 and usually a % relation of 2 groups which are in direct relation
59
ratio is
a fraction in which numerator is not included in the denominator can have a dimension to present one group in relation to another
60
dynamic measures
rate - related to certain time frame
61
prevalence calculation
number of sick animals at a particular point in time divided by number of individuals in the population at risk at that point in time
62
prevalence characteristics
dimensionless static measure proportion value from 0-1 probability measure
63
incidence definition
number of new cases that occur in a known population over a specified period of time
64
cumulative incidence calculation
number of animals that become diseased during a particular period divided by number of healthy animals in the population at the beginning of that period
65
what is cumulative incidence a measure of
average risk or probability that certain event will occur during defined time period
66
what are censored animals
animals lost from study due to loss and competing causes
67
CI calculation taking in to account censored animals
number of new cases of disease divided by number at risk at the start of the period minus half of the censored animals
68
pros and cons of CI
pro - simple to calculate con - new animal cannot be added, only for first occurrence of disease, not for recurring eg mastitis and can be used in dynamic populations but only for a short period of time
69
incidence rate
measures the rapidity with which new cases of disease develop over time
70
IR calculation
number of new cases of disease that occur in a population during a particular period of time divided by the sum, over all animals, of the length of time at risk of developing a disease IR = I/(number at risk at beginning + at end/2)
71
pros an cons of IR
pro - can be calculated in case of multiple disease occurrence con - can't be interpreted on the individual level and is complicated
72
morbidity
total number of diseased animals in a certain population over a given period of time divided by total number of animals in population
73
proportional morbidity
number of cases in a given population over certain time period divided with total number of diseased animals in a population
74
mortality
number of deaths during certain period of time divided by number of animals at the beginning of study
75
proportional mortality
total number of deaths of certain specific disease in certain population with respect to all recorded deaths in that population during that specific period of time
76
case fatality
number of deaths divided by number of diseased animals
77
survival rate
number of cases minus number of deaths divided by number of cases
78
crude measure
applied for whole population
79
specific method
applied for certain specific part of population or subpopulation
80
what is a diagnostic test
more or less an objective method for the reduction of diagnostic insecurity and to increase the speed of testing
81
potential problems of diagnostic test
cross reactivity, analytical specificity, non-specific inhibitors, improper timing etc
82
accuracy
how close are the test results to a real clinical condition (truth - gold standard)
83
validity
power to detect diseased and non-diseased animals
84
precision
results of repeated tests
85
gold standard
best existing test
86
true positive
sick animals correctly identified as positive
87
false positive
healthy animals incorrectly identified as positive
88
true negative
healthy animals correctly identified as negative
89
false negative
sick animals incorrectly identified as negative
90
sensitivity
proportion of diseased animals recognised by test as positive ones 100% sensitivity means no false negatives RULE OUT disease
91
sensitivity calculation
number of true positives divided by number of true positives plus number of false negatives
92
false positive rate
proportion of negative animals incorrectly classified as positive
93
false negative rate
proportion of positive animals incorrectly classified as negative
94
specificity
proportion of healthy animals recognised by the test as negative 100% specificity = no false positives RULE IN disease
95
when sensitivity increases....
specificity decreases and vice versa
96
predictive values
reflect diagnostic power of test
97
what do predictive values depend on
sensitivity, specificity and prevalence
98
positive predictive value
proportion of positive animals that really have the disease
99
negative predictive value
proportion of negative animals that really dont have the disease
100
increase in prevalence causes....
increased PPV
101
decrease in prevalence will cause...
increased NPV
102
if test is more sensitive then
higher NPV
103
if test is more specific then
higher PPV
104
likelihood ratio
assess the value of performing the diagnostic test higher LR, the better the test to rule IN the disease
105
smaller LR means
the better the test to rule OUT the disease
106
parallel testing
application of several tests on the same animal and if one is positive the animal is considered positive FP more likely to occur but increase NPV and Sn
107
serial testing
only animals recognised as positive will undergo the second tets
108
what is a mathematical model
mathematical description of the real world focuses on specific quantitative features of the scenario and ignores others (simplifies)
109
epidemic
higher incidence of disease than usual actively spreading often localised to a region
110
epidemic curve shape determined by
incubation period infectivity proportion of susceptible animals potential contact (distance between animals)
111
endemic
disease/condition present among a population at all times signs may be present or latent disease after epidemics
112
pandemic
epidemics that spread over multiple countries/ continents eg avian influenza, ASF
113
reproduction number definition
term that indicates how contagious an infectious disease is average number of animals that will contract a contagious disease from one sick animal
114
reproduction number calculation
infection rate divided by removal rate epidemic can only occur if Ro >1
115
factors determining reproduction number
infectiousness of pathogen, population density, course of infectiousness (incubation period, latent periods), mode of transmission, mixed population, seasonal variations, genetic variations in population at risk
116
highest reproduction number in which mode of transmission
airborne and
117
herd immunity
resistance of a group for attack of disease because of immunity of a large proportion of the members and so less likely of an affected individual to come in to contact with a susceptible individual prevalence or immunity in a population above which it becomes difficult for the organism to circulate and reach new susceptible animal
118
herd immunity can be
innate acquired - had a disease or vaccinated
119
density models
in case of diseases usually performed for cases where number of infectious agents can be numbered eg parasitic infections
120
prevalence models
presence or absence of disease in various host cohorts eg age groups, immunity status et c
121
deterministic models
describing situation with no random variation of input parameters more suitable for large populations
122
stochastic methods
enable probability distribution and CI to be associated with outputs possibility of chances, suitable for small populations
123
potential application of modelling
to model processes in organism - metabolism, drug kinetics etc estimation of population dynamics simulation of spreading diseases education animal production - simulation of profitability through reduction of negative factors
124
SIR model is
susceptible - infectious - recovered
125
enhancing SIR model
consider additional populations of disease vectors - fleas etc consider an exposed but not yet infected class - SEIR model SIR, SIS and double (gendered model) for STDs consider biased mixing, age differences, multiple types of transmission, geographic spread etc enhancements often need more compartments
126
SIR calculation
S+I+R= 1
127
reed frost model
also considers time and probability that an animal can't infect another animal
128
probability defintion
proportion of times an event would occur if an observation was repeated many times
129
risk definition
probability of an event among those experiencing the event divided by the number who are at risk
130
odds definiton
probability of an event divided by the probability of the event not happening
131
association
is present if probability of occurrence of a variable depends upon one or more variable
132
risk factor
any factor that is related to increased chance of disease/death etc
133
exposure
means that an animal was exposed (in contact) with specific risk factor
134
absolute risk
only those who have a condition due to exposure a/a+b
135
relative risk
if an association exists, then how strong is it? what is the ratio of the risk of disease in exposed individuals to the risk of disease in unexposed individuals?
136
relative risk calculation
risk in exposed divided by risk in unexposed incidence in exposed divided by incidence among unexposed
137
interpreting relative risk of a disease
RR >1 = positive association (probably causal) RR <1 = negative association (possibly protective)
138
if odds ratio is 1
no association
139
cohort studies and odds ratio
probability of disease occurrence
140
case control studies and odds ratio
ratio of exposure to risk factor in group case, compared to group control what are the odds that a case was exposed?
141
cross sectional studies and odds ratio
estimate prevalence odds ratio
142
odds calculation
probability of an event occurring divided by probability of the event not occurring
143
relationship between OR and RR
OR is a valid measure of association in its own right and is often used as an approximation of the relative risk OR always further from 1 than RR the higher the incidence the higher the discrepancy
144
attributable risk
the amount of proportion of disease incidence (or disease risk) that can be attributed to a specific exposure
145
what does AR include
baseline incidence and indicates what was the effect of the risk factor in the population
146
higher AR means
higher effect of the risk factor
147
attributable fraction
answers the question - which proportion of disease in exposed animals is due to exposure
148
when is AF difficult to calculate
in case-control studies
149
preventative fraction asks
how much disease among the non exposed group could be prevented by adding the exposure to the non exposed
150
population attributable risk
help assess the effect of primary prevention interventions on an entire population amount of risk that would be eliminated from th population if the exposure were eliminated
151
types of error
type 1 - alpha - accepting the hypothesis despite the fact Ho is correct type 2 - beta - acceptign the false Ho
152
why do we test if there is a difference
to determine what is a probability that differences are accidental or actual - significance
153
why do we test if there are no differences
how probable is that differences do exist but our test have failed to determine them