1. WHAT MAKES A CRIMINAL Flashcards
(36 cards)
What makes a criminal
Role models (SLT) Mental illness Drugs/alcohol Poor education Genetics
Background: Physiological explanations (serotonin)
High= happy and calm Low= depression and aggression
Aim of Bruner
To use gene-linkage analysis, where a single gene is followed through a family, to provide genetic explanations of crime
Sample for Bruner
Large, Dutch family containing men with a history of criminal behaviour
Method for Bruner
Case study
Procedure for Bruner
Analysed urine samples for 24 hours
Results for Bruner
Mutated gene of X chromosome, which leads to a lower production of MAO-A enzyme and the incomplete breakdown of serotonin
Increasing levels of serotonin
Conclusions of Bruner
A genetic mutation results in increased levels of serotonin, which is linked to an increase in aggressive behaviour
What did Bruner suggest
Too much of any neurotransmitter leads to ‘down regulation’ in the brain and no longer receive the effects of serotonin due to overloading
Pros of Bruner
Objective analysis- provides quantitative data which is easy to statistically analyse
Scientific due to control and standardisation
Useful applications by drug treatment
Cons of Bruner
Lack of generalisability due to small sample
Reductionist explanation of behaviour
Deterministic
Sample for Caspi
500 male students in New Zealand
Results for Caspi
Low levels of MAO-A were significantly more common in anti-social people, especially in context with a damaging environmental upbringing
Conclusions for Caspi
The interaction between genes and environment determines aggressive behaviour
Non-physiological explanations:
Farrington
Sample
411 8 year old London boys
Farrington:
Examples of questions asked to teachers and parents of the boys
Do you have a family member in prison
What is your income
What is your punishment for bad behaviour
Aim of Farrington
Do problem families produce problem children?
Method for Farrington
Longitudinal study- Ps selected were tested between 8 and 46
Questionnaires- e.g. asked about drinking/drug abuse, living circumstances, fighting/offending behaviour
Results for Farrington
Worst offenders from large, multi-problem families
E.g. divorced parents, family convictions, poor education, malnutrition
Conclusions for Farrington
many environmental factors can predict criminal behaviour
Function of pre-frontal cortex
Emotional expression
Functions of parietal cortex
Verbal ability + education level
Function of amygdala
Processes fear
Raine- brain dysfunction
Aim
Analyse levels of brain dysfunction using PET scans of murderers who had pleaded NGRI