100% Exams Flashcards
Score 100 (50 cards)
Professor Rita Guerra
Intercultural contact and the dynamics of acculturation
Topics
- Intergroup contact
- Acculturation theory and Mutuality in acculturation
- Intergroup factors and acculturation
Intergroup contact
Intro;
Predjudice through contact (Allport, 1954, p. 281)
“Prejudice (…) may be reduced by;
- equal status contact between majority and minority groups on the pursuit of common goals. 2. contact is sanctioned by institutional support( effect greatly enhanced
- it is of a sort that leads to the perception of common interests &
- common humanity between the members of the two groups”
Effects of Contact
Contact between different cultural groups has positive
effects, provided certain conditions
effects
(SIIE) 4 conditions for positive effect of contact
Equal status in the contact situation
Shared goals
Intergroup cooperation (interdependence )
Institutional / authorities support
Types of Contact
Quantity : frequency of interaction (how often we meet, talk, shop, socialize with)
Quality: nature of interaction (how positive, negative, friendly, …)
contact definition
contact theory how
contact theory meaning
+ “meaningful” contact – prejudice
stronger when conditions are met
contact theory how
- Anxiety + knowledge - Threat + empathy, Changes group norms , Changes social categorization
contact theory how
Perceived inclusive norms + cross group friendships Classroom norms promoting tolerance & respect: children \+ positive attitudes ( Thijs, et al., 2014)
contact theory how
Changes social categorization:
from Us vs Them to inclusive WE
(Gaertner, Dovidio, Guerra, Hehman, & Saguy, 2016)
Contact Theory: whom /Status asymmetry
contact works better for;
1. majorities/high status groups
than for minorities
Contact Theory: when/ Typicality
less effective when
outgroup members seen as very
atypical of their group
(Binder et al., 2009; for a review see Brown & Hewstone, 2005
Contact Theory: when/Positive–Negative Asymmetry: -
contact increases prejudice / avoidance more so
than positive reduces it.
+ encounters more frequent than -
encounters
Contact Theory: when/Positive–Negative Asymmetry: -
Anger & anxiety: key factors explaining negative contact effects - contact: mobilized LGBT students for collective action vs + contact mobilized heterosexual students
Forms of Contact
“measures or interventions based on the principles of intergroup contact (Allport, 1954), but which do not involve a face-to-face intergroup interaction.” Segregated settings, scarce opportunities for contact Intractable conflicts
Extended contact
knowing that ingroup members have outgroup friend: + attitudes and
willingness to engage in contact
Sub type: Vicarious contact “direct
observation of a positive interaction
between ingroup and outgroup
members, …. acquire new responses,
or modify the existing ones”
Imagined Contact
“the mental simulation of a social interaction with an outgroup member”: + positive interactions, +
comfortable, - anxiety; + self-efficacy ”.
Imagined Contact
Imagining contact with Gypsy people, or
Japanese people: - dehumanization, +
support for human rights, + positive
behavioral intentions
E-Contact
“computer mediated contact involving an engagement of self in the intergroup relationship”
(White and Abu-Rayya, 2012(p. 598).
Synchronous/real time text-based interaction mediated by online technology.
a bridge between distal,
indirect forms of intergroup contact and direct, FtF intergroup contact
“Dual-Identity, Electronic-Contact” (DIEC):
Muslim & Christian students (religiously segregated schools), interacted text-only
chat forum, 8 weeks.
Worked together: how aspects of their religious beliefs/practices could help
create an environmentally sustainable Australia: - intergroup bias, - anxiety,
after 12 months
White et al.’s (2014)
Indirect Contact – limitations ?
EC
authority figure shared group membership emphasized little opportunity for direct contact repeated sessions / variety of contexts IC positive interaction not confirm negative stereotypes group membership salient elaborate / more vivid scrip
chicago definitin
acculturation is to be distinguished from culture change, of which it is
but one aspect, and assimilation, which is at times a phase of acculturation
phenomena which result when groups of individuals having different cultures come into continuous first-hand contact, with
subsequent changes in the original culture patterns of either or both groups…