social influence Flashcards

1
Q

what is internalisation?

A
  • a change in private as well as public opinion/ behaviour
  • occurs when a person genuinely accepts the group norms
  • persists even in absence of group members
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is identification?

A
  • publicly change opinion/behaviour may not privately agree

* act in the same way as the group because you want to be apart of it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is compliance?

A
  • going along with others in public

* temporary, usually stops as soon as group pressure stops

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is informational social influence (ISI)?

A
  • need to be right

* agree with the opinion of the majority or person you believe is most likely to be correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is normative social influence (NSI)?

A
  • need to be liked

* agree with the opinion of the majority because we want to be accepted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is the research support for ISI?

A
  • Lucas et al. asked students to give answers to mathematical problems that were easy or more difficult
  • greater conformity to incorrect answers when they were more difficult
  • this shows that people conform in situations where they feel they don’t know the answer which is predicted by the ISI explanation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are the individual differences in NSI?

A
  • Some research shows that NSI doesn’t affect everyone’s behaviour in the same way
  • people who are less concerned about being liked are less affected by NSI
  • this shows that desire to be liked underlies conformity for some people more than others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what was the procedure of Asch’s study?

A

•tested conformity by asking participants to match a standard line to it’s comparison
•each participant was tested individually in a group of
6-8 confederates
•all confederates were instructed to give the wrong answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what were the findings of Asch’s study?

A
  • participants gave the wrong answer 36.8 percent of the time
  • most participants said they conformed to avoid rejection (NSI)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the three variations Asch further investigated and the results?

A
  • group size: addition of further confederates made little difference, suggests that a small majority isn’t sufficient for influence to be exerted
  • unanimity: confederate who disagreed with the others introduced which led to reduced conformity, suggests that the influence of the majority depends on the group being unanimous
  • task difficulty: increased difficulty increased conformity, suggests that ISI has a greater affect when test is harder
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How is Asch’s research a child of its time?

A
  • Repeats of Asch’s study had less conformity
  • society has changed since the study took place
  • this is a limitation of his study because results can’t be applied to today
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does the artificial situation and task of Asch’s study affect his findings?

A
  • participants knew they were in a research study and demand characteristics could have affected the
  • groups don’t resemble what everyday life is like
  • this is a limitation because findings cannot be generalised to everyday situations (lack of external validity)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why is there limited application of findings for Asch’s study?

A
  • only American men where tested, United States is an individualist culture so less likely to conform and men are also less likely to conform than women
  • conformity levels are sometimes higher than Asch found, his findings can only be applied to American men
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the procedure of Zimbardo’s study?

A
  • set up a mock prison at Stanford University
  • students who passed psychological testing were randomly assigned guard of prisoner
  • prisoners had strict daily routines and guards had their own uniform, were given complete power over prisoners
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were the findings of Zimbardo’s study?

A
  • within two days prisoners rebelled against the harsh conditions, guards harassed prisoners
  • after the rebellion prisoners were subdued and depressed
  • guards became more brutal and enjoyed the power they had been given
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was the conclusion of Zimbardo’s study?

A

•participants and researchers conformed to their social roles

17
Q

How did Zimbardo control variables in his study?

A
  • selection of participants, emotionally stable participants chosen
  • increases internal validity of the study
18
Q

How did Zimbardo’s study have a lack of realism?

A
  • participants could have been acting on stereotypes of guards and prisoners
  • however Zimbardo gave evidence that it was real to participants, 90 percent of prisoners’ conversations were about prison life
  • high internal validity due to participants believing it was real
19
Q

What was the role of dispositional factors in Zimbardo’s study?

A
  • Zimbardo accused of exaggerating influence of social roles and minimising role of personality factors
  • a minority of guards behaved in a brutal manor
  • suggests that Zimbardo’s conclusion may be over-stated
20
Q

what was the procedure of milgram’s obedience study?

A
  • 40 male participants that believed the experiment would be on memory
  • participants believed a ‘teacher’ and ‘learner’ were randomly selected however confederate always ended up as the ‘learner’
  • ‘teacher’ required to give increasingly stronger shocks each time the ‘learner’ made a mistake in the learning task
  • when participants turned to experimenter for guidance the same four ‘prods’ were used
21
Q

what were the findings in milgram’s obedience study?

A
  • no participants stopped below 300 volts
  • 65 percent continued to the highest level of 450 volts
  • participants showed sigs of extreme tension such as trembling and even seizures
22
Q

how did milgram’s obedience study have low internal validity?

A
  • Orne and Holland argued that participants didn’t really in the set up, they thought the shocks were fake
  • it lacked internal validity
  • participants even stated their doubts about the shocks
23
Q

how can the low internal validity in milgram’s obedience study be argued?

A
  • a similar experiment conducted where real shocks were given to a puppy and majority of participants gave what they believe to be a fatal shock
  • this suggests milgram’s study was genuine because people behaved the same way with real shock
24
Q

how did milgram’s obedience study have good external validity?

A
  • despite the lab setting the relationship between the authority figure and the participant reflected authority relationships in real life
  • hofling et al. studied nurses and found high levels of obedience to unjustified demands from doctors
  • this suggests that milgram’s study can be generalised to other situations
25
Q

how did milgram’s study have supporting replication?

A
  • replication of milgram’s study was made into a French tv show where the participants believed they were being paid to shock people (actually actors) in front of an audience
  • 80 percent of participants gave maximum shock to an apparently unconscious man, behaviour was the same as milgram’s study and supports original conclusion
26
Q

what was the conclusion of milgram’s obedience study?

A

ordinary people will unjust obey orders from an authority figure