week nine Flashcards

1
Q

can encroachment happen in the air space

A

yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the ‘land affected’ with wrongly placed structures

A

the land on which the structure is situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the ‘land intended’ with wrongly placed structures

A

where it was supposed to be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

does it matter under the Property Law Act 2007 if encroachment was done deliberately

A

no, although you will get more hammered in terms of compensation or what the court will require you to do if it was done deliberately

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what things might the court do in the situation of wrongly placed structures

A

grant an easement in favour of B over A’s land, order removal of the offending structure, alter the titles so the whole boundary moved, grant a right of possession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

who can apply for relief under s321 - 325 (wrongly placed structures) of the Property Law Act 2007

A

A or B or any other person involved in A or B - a wide umbrella of people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

the court will grant relief (for wrongly placed structures, Property Law Act 2007) if it is considered ___ and ____

A

just and equitable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

the court can’t grant relief under s321-325 Property Law Act 2007 (wrongly placed structures) in relation to fences, why?

A

because fences are covered by the Fencing Act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

any award made under Property Law Act 2007 s 321 - 325 (wrongly placed structures) does not stop you from suing in what type of action

A

a tortious action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

unjust enrichment under s 321 - 325 Property Law Act 2007 (wrongly placed structures) goes to whom?

A

it could go either way, but it is more likely to be B who has a part of their structure sitting on someone elses land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is included in the definition of a structure under the PLA 2007

A

any building, driveway, path, retaining wall, fence, plantation or other improvement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is included in the definition of land under the PLA 2007

A

any piece or area of land, including the airspace over that land, and, in the case of land actually occupied by a wrongly placed structure, also includes any land reasonably required as curtilage and for access to the structure”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

in the case of a wrongly placed structure, the court must only grant relief if it is satisfied that it is ___ and ____ to do so

A

just and equitable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

equity assists the vigilant, not those who ?

A

sleep on their rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what happened in Kiel v Thompson

A

Appellant Kiel erected a concrete wall inside his boundary to prevent further encroachment after his neighbour laid a concrete drive and garage over the boundary

he contributed to the problem by building this wall and doing nothing for 40 years, depriving himself of his strip of land

successive owners purchased the neighbouring property believing the garage and driveway formed part of the land they were buying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what was the result of Kiel v Thompson

A

the strip was vested in number 4 and number 2 (kiel) would receive $13,000 for the strip from the Thompsons as compensation for missing out