week ten Flashcards

1
Q

what does the word Ombudsman mean

A

‘entrusted person’ or ‘grievance representative’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

which types of investigations of the Ombudsman are more expensive: Official information act or ombudsman act

A

official information act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

public law = constitutional law + ?

A

administrative law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is administrative law

A

the part of the legal system where the administration is reviewed by courts and other bodies - the rules which bind the executive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are administrative laws two roles

A
  1. guiding the administration/executive to ensure they know what the rules are
  2. provide remedy against the state when it all goes wrong - somewhere to go to resolve the dispute
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is the extensive role of the courts in administrative law and what is the problem with it

A

judicial review - expensive, get results you don’t necessarily want, formalities etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are dicey’s two main principles of the rule of law that apply to administrative law and how do they apply

A
  1. no one is punishable except for a breach of law - the government can only do things when law provides for it
  2. everyone is equal before the law - there are no specialist administrative rules or tribunals/courts, they are dealt with through the ordinary courts and are treated exactly the same there as us
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Dicey’s system of administrative law differs greatly to the French model (used around many places in the world), why?

A

they have a counsiel d’Etat (council of state) which is an advisory council specifically to advise on administrative matter, which has now evolved into a separate system of courts.

administrative law is separated from everyone else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are 2 key features of Dicey’s ideas about administrative law

A
  • parliament is the key body in controlling public power

- no explicitly administrative or constitutional role for the courts, though they have developed this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Dicey opposes the idea of executive discretion, because where law ends ?

A

tyranny begins

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

who are tasked with policing the Official Information Act

A

Ombudsman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what are the 4 groups of reasons for withholding information under the Official Information Act 1982

A

protected interests

integrity of government processes

administrative grounds

fourth group applies specifically to the Cook Islands, Tokelau, Nieu and the Ross Dependency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how long do departments have to notify their decision of whether or not to grant an Official Information Act request

A

20 working days

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is Dicey’s red light theory

A

executive is within the box - law. the box is passed by Parliament so they confine the executive and the courts sit just outside the box stopping the executive from coming our of the box

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what are the practical problems with Dicey’s red light theory

A

this is not how the NZ constitution works. house of parliament is fused with the executive, so we end up, in practice, with the executive policing itself. they can expand the box and give themselves more power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what are the political limits of Dicey’s red light theory

A

as a nation/community, we want the box to get bigger.

17
Q

what is KC Davis’s green light theory

A

governments have to govern, we have to embrace discretion.

involve law in discretions use

18
Q

KC Davis said a system of administrative justice has to do 3 things

A
  • confine discretion
  • checking discretion
  • structuring discretion
19
Q

why do we need an Ombudsman

A

growing state, more expected from government and its institutions, perception of lack of institutional accountability

20
Q

what institutions are subject to the Ombudsman

A

a wide range - wide jurisdiction! includes central and local authorities, almost all Crown entities and public bodies (school boards, universities, health boards) etc.

21
Q

what are some exclusions to the jurisdiction of the Ombudsman

A
  • lawyers, MPs and Ministers of the Crown - but advice given to a Minister by an agency that is subject to the act is not excluded)
  • the police - they have their own independent police conduct authority
  • local council decisions
  • decisions of courts, tribunals or parole board
22
Q

why is the Ombudsman the last resort

A

complaints are expected to first exhaust internal avenues of complaint.

they may not investigate where a court or tribunal appeal right exists (s13) and have discretion not to investigate where an adequate remedy is available or further investigation is unnecessary (s17)

23
Q

what can the Ombudsman ground a finding on

A

nearly anything

24
Q

what are the outcomes of Ombudsman inquiries

A

focus on righting the wrong - they can recommend anything at all but there is no power of enforcement

25
Q

the political cost of not doing what the Ombudsman says is ____ (high or low)

A

high

26
Q

is the Ombudsman subject to judicial review in NZ

A

not for their decisions, very limited judicial review on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction under s25 Omubudsman Act, Official Information Act decisions can be reviewed in courts.

Overall, courts are very reluctant to second guess the Ombudsman anyways - complex decisions like these are better suited to the inquisitorial nature of the Ombudsman anyways

27
Q

why would courts practically not review the Ombudsman

A

people might lose faith in Ombudsman recommendations, courts get lots of reviews making them busy and people can’t afford judicial review anyways

28
Q

what do Ombudsman public annual reports say?

A

they raise issues of general concern in the Administration and pressure implied agencies to improve e.g. told ACC to get internal complaints mechanisms

29
Q

what percentage of people know about the Ombudsman

A

70

30
Q

what are some potential challenges ahead for the Ombudsman

A
  • funding issues
  • not always keeping pace with demand
  • delays
  • potential lack of respect from the executive at times, particularly where that executive has been in for a long time and start to feel above everyone
31
Q

what are the constitutional reasons for allowing access to public information

A
  • incoming governments know what they’re getting

- we can make informed decisions about voting - shows what the government is just saying vs what they are actually doing

32
Q

what are the administrative reasons for allowing access to public information

A
  • accountability (how can you challenge decisions when you don’t know how they were made in the first place
  • opening things up and seeing what people are up to means greater efficiency (we know people are doing things) and ensuring decisions are taken how they are supposed to be taken
33
Q

why do we have to balance letting public information out and keeping it in

A

we don’t want our personal information (health, finances, address) to be shared with everyone and there is also some collective information the state has that we also don’t want shared (international relations and negotiations, defence, security, police investigation tactics, economic information)

34
Q

what was the UK Official Secrets Act 1911 and when did it apply in NZ till

A

there was an obsession that German spies were everywhere so they passed this quick law to make EVERYTHING a secret. It was badly written - one defence within it was that information sharing in the ‘public interest’ was authorised, but the Act didn’t define what a public interest was. It applied in NZ until 1951

35
Q

what was the NZ Official Secrets Act 1951

A
  • presumption of secrecy
  • all government documents secret
  • still a public interest defence, as in the UK Official Secrets Act 1911
  • executive discretion to release information
  • otherwise - releasing information was a criminal offence