Criminal Law Principles Flashcards

1
Q

What is actus reus?

A

the act required to commit a given crime (required for every crime)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How do you satisfy actus reus?

A

D must perform a VOLUNTARY physical act; a voluntary bodily movement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Can omission constitute actus reus?

A

Yes (failure to act) if:

  1. D had specific legal duty to act
  2. D had knowledge of facts giving rise to the duty; and
  3. it was reasonably necessary for D to perform the duty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is mens rea?

A

the mental element required at time a crime was committed (required for every crime)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the different types of mens rea?

A
  1. specific intent
  2. general intent
  3. malice
  4. intent doesn’t matter: strict liability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is specific intent?

A

D must have the specific intent or object to commit the crime; must be proven (never inferred)

Mistake of fact and voluntary intoxication are defenses to negate SI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is general intent?

A

D must be aware of his action any attendant circumstances; may be inferred from act itself; most crimes are GI crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is malice?

A

D act w/ reckless disregard or undertakes obvious risk, from which a harmful result is expected (applies to arson and CL murder)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is strict liability?

A

no mens rea is required (aka no intent or awareness needs to be proven) - arises w/ administrative and morality crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the MPC mens rea standards?

A
  1. purposely: subjective std, when conscious objective is to engage in a certain conduct and cause certain result
  2. knowingly: subjective std, person is aware that his conduct is of a particular nature or knows that his condcut will necessarily or very likely cause particular result
  3. recklessly: subjective std, person knows of substantial and unjustifiable risk and consciously disregards it
  4. negligently: objective std, fails to become aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the SI crimes?

A
attempt 
larceny & robbery
forgery
false pretenses
embezzlement 
conspiracy
assault
burglary
first-degree murder
solicitation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are general intent crimes?

A

battery
rape
kidnapping
false imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are malice crimes?

A
CL murder (malice aforethought)
arson
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are strict liability crimes?

A

statutory rape
regulatory crimes
administrative crimes
morality crimes (polygamy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the concurrence and causation requirements?

A

concurrence: D’s criminal act and requisite MR to commit crime occur simultaneously
causation: cause in fact and proximate cause

superseding factors break chain of causation
intervening: must be entirely unforeseeable to shield D from liability (V’s refusal of med. treatment, third-party neg. = foreseeable)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the transferred intent doctrine?

A

D may be held liable if he intends the harm caused, but causes it to a different V or object than intended

this does not apply to attempt

17
Q

What is the effect of the transferred intent doctrine?

A

D is usually charged w/ 2 crimes: attempt (to commit orig. crime) and the actual, resulting crime

D intends to shoot A but kills. D can be charged w/ attempted murder of A and murder of B (no merger because DIFFERENT victims)

18
Q

What is the merger doctrine?

A

concerns relationship between inchoate & completed substantive offense; or offense and lesser included offense

when it applies, two offense merge - prohibiting D from being prosecuted for both crimes

19
Q

When does merger apply for inchoate crimes?

A

only applies to solicitation and attempt (prevents D from being convicted of both sol & attempt and the target offense)

D completes burglary after attempting - D cannot be convicted of both attempt and burg.

20
Q

Does merger apply to conspiracy?

A

No - can be convicted of conspiracy to commit crime and the crime itself

21
Q

Can D be convicted of a target crime adn a lesser included offense?

A

No - (LIO = includes same but not all elements of greater crime)

D’s robbery accomplice kills V during robb. D can be convicted of felony murder but not lesser included robb offense.

22
Q

Do crimes w/ different victims merge?

A

Never

23
Q

What are the inchoate offenses?

A

solicitation
conspiracy
attempt

24
Q

Who is an accomplice?

A

one who aids, encourages, or counsels principal committing a crime w/ the intent to encourage commission

25
Q

Is mere presence at the crime enough to be an accomplice?

A

No - need to assist in some way

26
Q

When is an accomplice liable?

A

liable for the original crime and other foreseeable crimes committed by the principals in its furtherance

27
Q

What defenses can an accomplice raise to liability?

A

Withdrawal: D can withdraw effectively before crimes are committed or become unstoppable

How?
1. repudiate encourage and/or neutralize initial aid

28
Q

What is an accessory-after-the-fact?

A

different from accomplice liability; involves helping someone escape or avoid apprehension; gives rise to separate, lesser charge of obstruction of justice