Protecting the Attorney-Client Relationship from outside interference Flashcards
1
Q
May an opposing lawyer interview employees, of a corporate party known to have counsel, in the matter, if their acts or omissions in the matter under inquiry, are binding on the corporation or imputed to the corporation for purposes of its liability, or if they are employees implementing the advice of counsel?
A
No. Niesig v Team I
2
Q
Does the above rule apply to former employees?
A
No. Niesig v Team I
3
Q
May the government use deception in its investigations in order to induce suspects into making incriminating statements?
A
Yes. United States v Carona
