5. Prosecution Procedure Flashcards

1
Q

With reference to category 3, and 2 offences, who can elect trial by jury?

A

S6 offences - Cat 3 - can elect jury trial

if the offence is a category three offence (punishable by imprisonment of two years or more) the defendant will have the right to elect trial by jury

S7 offences - Cat 2 - cannot elect jury trial

if the offence is a category two offence (punishable by imprisonment of less than two years or a community based sentence) the defendant doesn’t have the right to elect trial by jury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Offences against s6 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975 are category three offences. These include:

Offences against s7 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975 are category two offences. These include:

A

S6 - Category three offences
• importing or exporting
• producing or manufacturing
• supplying or administering, or offering to supply or administer
• selling or offering to sell (Class C only)
• possessing for any of the above purposes any controlled drug.

S7 - Category two offences
• possession and consuming controlled drugs
• supplying, administering or offering to supply or administer Class C controlled drugs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Section 139 of the Criminal Procedure Act outlines the procedure if charges are to be held together, what occurs when more than one offence is tried by a jury?

A

If one charge is to be tried by a jury, then all charges must be tried by a jury.

  • If one Defendant elects to be tried by a jury on one charge, all charges against the Defendant’s must be tried by jury.
  • For example, if a defendant is charged with cultivation of cannabis (a category three offence) and possession of utensils (a category two offence), and the defendant elects trial by jury for the cultivation charge, both charges will go to trial by jury.
  • Likewise, if one charge is to be tried in the High Court, all charges must be tried in the High Court.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

As per the Crown Prosecution Regulations 2013, the only drug offences that are automatically prosecuted by the Crown following plea are:

A
  • s6(1)(b) or (2A) production or manufacture of, or conspiracy to produce or manufacture, methamphetamine
  • Aiding offences against corresponding law of another country corresponding to section 6, 9, 12A or 12AB.
  • Commission of offences outside New Zealand.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define “Large-scale dealing”

A

“Large-scale dealing” means suspected dealing in a quantity of drugs that is more than 5 times the presumption threshold.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The prosecution of Class A drug offences (Dealing or Conspiring to deal) will only be Crown prosecutions if three criteria are met:

A

(a) the quantity of drugs is more than 5 times the quantity of the presumption threshold, including in combination with any other charges being heard together in the proceeding; or
(b) there is evidence of large-scale dealing beyond the actual quantity seized; or
(c) there is substantial evidence derived from a surveillance device involving audio interception.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The prosecution of Class B drug offences (Dealing or Conspiring to deal) will only be Crown prosecutions if three criteria are met:

A

a) the quantity of drugs is more than 10 times the quantity of the presumption threshold, including in combination with any other charges being heard together in the proceeding; or
(b) there is evidence of large-scale dealing beyond the actual quantity seized; or
(c) there is substantial evidence derived from a surveillance device involving audio interception.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The prosecution of Class C drug offences (Dealing or Conspiring to deal) will only be Crown prosecutions if three criteria are met:

A

(a) evidence of large-scale commercial dealing; or
(b) substantial evidence derived from a surveillance device involving audio interception.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

For sentencing purposes, cannabis cultivation is divided into three broad categories, define them.

A

• Category 1: growing of a small number of cannabis plants for personal use by the offender without any sale to another party occurring or being intended.

• Category 2: small-scale cultivation of cannabis plants for a commercial purpose, ie, with the object of deriving profit.

• Category 3: large-scale commercial growing, usually with a considerable degree of sophistication and organisation.

Note: Alleged offending falling within category 3 above is a Crown prosecution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Large-scale commercial cultivation may be substantiated by the following three factors:

A

(i) Volume of cannabis found in the defendant’s possession;
(ii) Evidence of an extensive and sophisticated ongoing operation involving regular crop rotation;
(iii) Evidence of extensive crop yields;

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What factors would substantiate large scale dealing?

A

Admissions made by the defendant

Evidence of chemical purchases
Intercepted communications

Significant cash holdings and/or movements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the time limits surrounding filing charging documents?

A

S28 MODA 75

(a) Dealing, cultivating or aiding offences against corresponding law in another country - No Time Limit
(b) Any other offence against the act - Four Years After the date on which it was Committed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Outlined what is stipulated in Section 16 of the Bail Act 2000

A

S16 Bail Act 2000

“A defendant who is charged with or convicted of a drug dealing offence may be granted bail by order of a High Court Judge or District Court Judge but not otherwise.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Outlined what is stipulated in Section 17 of the Bail Act 2000

A

S17A Bail Act 2000

(1) This section applies to a defendant of or over the age of 17 years who is charged with a serious Class A drug offence.
(2) No defendant to whom this section applies may be granted bail or allowed to go at large unless the defendant satisfies the Judge that bail or remand at large should be granted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Outline the four key steps in relation to the Bail Application Process for drug dealing offences.

A
  • Application for bail must be made before District or High Court Judge by defendant’s lawyer
  • OC to have forwarded instructions on bail to prosecutor
  • Full and detailed reasons for bail to be opposed
  • Judge will remand defendant for CRH or whatever is considered appropriate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

For the evidence in the certificate to be admissible, certain procedures must be strictly followed. These procedures ensure that:

A
  • the chain of evidence is unbroken
  • the material to be analysed is not tampered with or contaminated
  • the defence is aware of the analysis and the results and is given reasonable time to prepare a defence.
17
Q

Section 31(2) provides two methods of delivering a drug exhibit to the ESR so that certificate evidence can be used. You can deliver the exhibit:

A
  • in person to the analyst who is to issue the certificate, or to a person authorised by the analyst to receive it
  • by registered post or by courier post with signature required in a sealed package to an employee who has been authorised by the analyst in charge at the laboratory.
18
Q

Admissibility of Certificate, the certificate is admissible evidence only if:

A

Admissible only if:

− you notify the defendant of your intention at least seven days before the hearing, and give them a copy of the analyst’s certificate
− the defendant does not request, at least three days before the hearing and in writing, that the analyst be called
− the Court does not request the oral evidence of the analyst.

19
Q

Name two common examples of instruments of crime in drug dealing cases.

A

S142B Sentencing Act 2002

Court to be notified of any instruments of crime so forfeiture can be considered. Eg:

  • House used to manufacture Methamphetamine
  • Motor vehicle used to deliver drugs
20
Q

Section 3 Bail Act 2000
drug dealing offence means—

A

(a) any offence against section 6 or 12C(1)(a) of the MODA1975 in relation to a Class A&B controlled drug or
(b) an attempt to commit an offence referred to in paragraph (a)]