Personal Investigation 1 Flashcards

1
Q

What is the aim of PI 1?

A

To find out if whether there will be a change in participants attitude to helping behaviour after watching a video clip on helping behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why is the hypothesis non-directional in PI 1? (Justification)

A

Previous research that has been undertaken in attitudes towards helping behaviour has displayed conflicting or inconsistent findings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

State the experimental hypothesis for PI 1.

A

There will be a difference in participants scores on Nickell’s scale before and after watching video clip on helping behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

State the null hypothesis for PI 1?

A

There will be no difference in participants scores on Nickell’s scale before and after watching a video clip on helping behaviour, any difference will be due to chance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

State the independent variable.

A

Before clip and watching helping behaviour and after clip watched.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

State the dependant variable

A

Score measures on Nickell’s attitude to helping in condition A and condition B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Confounding variable

A
  1. Isolation may have affected some participants-lack of motivation
  2. Some may have previously seen the video- less emotional impact
  3. Some may be naturally less helpful
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Extraneous variables

A
  1. Having to remain in year/class bubbles due to COVID-19 Ps were not allowed to move around school and therefore not gaining any influence from other year groups
  2. Time of day- experiment took place before lunch meaning Ps would have been hungry, less engaged
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Methodology: 1. what type of experiment? 2. What experimental design

A
  1. Lab experiment as it allows us to measure cause and effect, high internal validity, manipulation of variables and allows full replication
  2. Repeated measures as matched pairs would have taken too much time in current situation (Covid-19) and we needed participants to complete both conditions (control and experimental) for valid comparison
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Sample: target population, sampling method

A

Newport night student from one form class aged 11-12, opportunity sample as it’s cost effective and less time consuming than random. However inevitably bias as the sample is drawn from a specific sub group (students), cannot be generalised, not as representative as random.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Descriptive statistic

A

Median as it’s appropriate for ordinal data and not affected by extreme scores (mean is) but is not as representative as mean as exact values are not reflected in median.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Graphical representation

A

Bar chart - represents non continuous data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Inferential statistics and statistical results

A

Wilcoxon as data is ordinal, design is repeated measures and is a test of difference.
Observed value= 83 critical value= 81 N= 24, accept null reject experimental as level of significance= p

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

3 Findings

A
  1. P’s generally had a higher score in condition B rather than A
  2. The range in both conditions was 49
  3. The median score for condition A was 69 and condition B 69.5
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Conclusions

A

The observed value (83) was greater than the critical value (81) therefore significance is not shown. Null hypothesis rejected alternative rejected. No difference was found on P’s score on NS before and after watching clip

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Reliability

A

Interater, to compare findings to another’s findings and the extent to which they agree needed to be +80 or more, we would implement it by once questionnaires complete another person conduct the questions using same measures/tools and compare findings- total number of agreements

17
Q

Validity: issues and assessing

A

Issue- demand characteristics and social desirability to avoid this we deceived participants by telling them they were completing a study on perception rather than giving them the true aim
Assessing- face validity, concerning whether it measures what it intends to measure ie helping behaviour, ensure our experiment , questions and video clip are relevant

18
Q

2 ethical issues and how they are dealt with

A
  1. Deception- to avoid demand characteristics but Ps were debriefed, given full sums and opportunity to ask questions at the end of the experiment
  2. Confidentiality- no names given, Ps given numbers and not easily recognisable