Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Investigations Test 2 > Section 7.1 > Flashcards

Section 7.1 Flashcards

1
Q

Put people in a room holding a number and have them do an action or say a line in the exact same way.

A

Lineup

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Can have actions or spoken words. Must be the same for all.

A

Lineup

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The police officer who is running the lineup with the witness who is asking if any of them look like the suspect. Should the officer know which one is the actual suspect?

A

No. Double bind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Proper or smart to record the entire thing just incase their is an accusation of impropriety at the trial. Record what?

A

Lineup

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Right to refuse lineup, but that can be used against you. Right to counsel during lineup. What case?

A

Schmerber V California (1966)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Supreme court said if the suspect does not want to participate in a lineup they have the right to refuse that but the prosecution can use that against you in court. What case?

A

Schmerber V California (1966)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Example, they can tell the jury the defendant was so scared of being identified by the witness that he refused to participate in the lineup and the jury can determine guilty or not. What case?

A

Schmerber V California (1966)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

If the police are asking you to participate in a lineup fo you have the right to have a lawyer present?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

There are at least two people in the process of surveillance:
1.
2.

A
  1. surveillant

2. subject

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The investigator and it can be one or a whole team. Usually they are in plain clothes so they do not tip off the person. Who is this?

A

Surveillant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The person being observed by the surveillant is who?

A

Subject

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

You need signals so that you can communicate with other people without being obvious. What kind of surveillance?

A

Stationary surveillance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Example, if you are conducting a stakeout and you are operating a hotdog booth on the streets of New York to keep an eye on the front of a building you need to be bale to do a small signal that you either see something or you do not. This is important during what ?

A

Stationary surveillance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

AKA Stakeout and you needs signals.

A

stationary surveillance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

You wait to nail someone; you want to follow them where they are going and what they are going. This is known as what?

A

Moving Surveillance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How many types of moving surveillance are there?

A

3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

People know they are under surveillance,

A

Moving surveillance

OPEN (visible)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Most of the time we want to keep quiet that we are surveilling someone and we can risk them getting away because you do not want them to know you are following them.

A

Moving surveillance

Loose (Not to close)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

A little riskier and it is a little easier for people to tell they are being followed but it is much harder for them to get away from people following them.

A

Moving surveillance

Tight (Very close)

20
Q

Three types of surveillance equipment
1.
2.
3.

A
  1. Aerial
  2. Video
  3. Audio
21
Q

Helicopters, airplanes, or satellites to surveil people and that does not violate any expectation of privacy.

A

Aerial surveillance

22
Q

Anything you an see from a helicopter from above you cannot come down above a certain number of feet, you have no reasonable expectation of privacy, and they can fly over with a camera or whatever and it is all perfectly legal. What case?

A

florida V Riley (1989)

23
Q

No expectation of privacy

A

Florida v Riley (1989)

24
Q

Surveillance cameras in places hidden and visible.

A

Video surveillance

25
Q

A lot of parking services and police departments will go through parking lots with a camera pointed at license plates to check for registration, parking tickets, outstanding warrants, etc..

A

License plate recognition

26
Q

Open or hidden

License plate recognition

A

Video surveillance

27
Q

Listen in on people’s phone calls. Almost without exception require some kind of warrant.

A

Wiretaps

28
Q

Listening devices that police can plant in a room where they think crime is going to happen or be discussed,

A

Bugs

29
Q

New fancy ways to do audio surveillance.

A

Lasers on glass

30
Q

Any sound happening in a room will cause the windows of that room to vibrate. Noise is just vibrating air an when it hits the glass it vibrates as well. They have developed the ability to use ______ from hundreds of feet away and the ______ reads vibrations and translates that into sound of what is happening in that room.

A

lasers

31
Q

Recording in the back of a patrol car is fine. What case?

A

US v McKinnon (1993)

32
Q

2 guys arrested and put in a patrol car. They think they are alone and discuss the crime they just committed. They were being recorded. The Supreme Court said you do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the back of a patrol car. What case?

A

US V McKinnon (19930

33
Q

Enhanced senses is a search, in most cases. what case?

A

Kyllo v US (2011)

34
Q

Police had information that a certain house or one house on a certain street had an indoor marijuana grow operation. Without a warrant they used a thermal imaging camera to look at the houses on the street to see if there was a hotspot. One house was glowing hot and they used that to get a warrant. The supreme court said no because why?

A

You are going above and beyond what a normal person would be able to use as technology for surveillance so that required a warrant.

(Kyllo v US (2011))

35
Q

Binoculars are common and officers can use them to enhance their senses and it does not go beyond the bounds of a reasonable thing and can still qualify as plain view. True or False

A

True

36
Q

Anything that can invade your privacy or is very common with people can be used to enhance your senses but not anything that is uncommon or expensive unless you have a warrant. True or False

A

True

37
Q

When a police officer is undercover, they are either hiding who they are.

A

Deception of identity

38
Q

I’m am a drug dealer. But really a police officer.

A

Deception of Identity

39
Q

Might be investigating one thing but they approach you about something else and act like they are talking to you as a witness to something else.

A

Deception of purpose

40
Q

Police can go undercover in schools. What case?

A

Gordon v Warren Consolidated Board of Education (1983)

41
Q

there are a few different court cases about undercover work. The police put undercover officers in the high school and the Supreme Court said it was okay because they were not a disruption to the learning environment . What case?

A

Gordon v Warren Consolidated Board of Education (1983)

42
Q

Police can also go undercover in prisons or online. True or False

A

True

43
Q

It is only entrapment if the person can prove that they probable or even maybe would not have done it except for the fact that the police gave them the idea or started them on the process of committing the crime. True or False

A

True

44
Q

Entrapment is “the conception and planning of and offense by an officer and his procurement of its commission by one who would not have perpetrated it except for the trickery, persuasion, or fraud of the office .” What case?

A

Sorrels V US (1932)

45
Q

Entrapment must be “product of the creative activity” of the officer. What case?

A

Sherman V US (1958)

46
Q

Sorrels v US (1932)

Sherman V US (1958)

A

Entrapment cases

Investigations Test 2 (25 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions