RL: VIA NEGATIVA Flashcards

1
Q

What is the problem with using our normal language to describe God?

A

We have words that apply only to finite, imperfect things such as ‘judge’ or ‘father’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the via negative proposing?

A

That we should only speak about God in negatives to emphasise the difference between God and humanity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the issue with saying ‘God is love’?

A

Human love has many flaws and jealousies, fluctuations and limits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the problem with saying ‘God is good’?

A

Our own goodness is so flawed and temporary that it is wrong to use the same concept and try to apply it to God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What do people who support the via negativa state?

A

That it is better to accept the mysteries of God than to try to pin God down by using flawed concepts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How does the via negativa solve these problems?

A

By pointing out what God is not, people can still communicate the infinity and mystery of God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does Dionysius argue about the via negativa?

A

It is the only way to speak about God, because God is beyond all human understanding and imagination.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does Dionysius state about the soul’s need to be unified with God?

A

Beyond the realms of sense of perception and rationality, entering obscurity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does Dionysius state about sense and reason?

A

It is counter-productive to speak of God as though God can be perceived by the senses or that we can reach God through reason.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does Maimondes state about the via negativa?

A

Supporter. Stated that to say what God is not would move us closer to understanding what God is, without limiting Him in our thoughts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does the Via Negativa come closest too?

A

Meeting the challenge of the falsification principle.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What has Stiver argued in support of the Via Negativa?

A

No cognitive or descriptive content is allowed and this approach undercuts any approach involving cognitive meaning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How did Davis criticise Maimonides?

A

Only saying what something is does not give any indication of what it actually is.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How can it be argued that the via negativa is based on a contradiction?

A

We do naturally speak the unspeakable even if it is in a negative way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How can the via negativa be criticised by Flew?

A

A definition of God that speaks only of negative attributes ‘dies a death of a thousand qualifications’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the problem with people using their normal vocabulary?

A

They have words that apply only to finite, imperfect things.

17
Q

What does speaking about God only in the negative emphasise?

A

The difference between God and humanity.

18
Q

What do those in favour of the via negativa argue?

A

Descriptions of God are plain statements of fact.

19
Q

What is the issue with calling God ‘good’?

A

Own goodness is so flawed and temporary that is wrong to use the same concept and try to apply it to God.