Lecture 3 Flashcards

1
Q

Why do investors seek to improve firm’s social outcomes?

A
  1. Social preferences play a significant role in investors’ SRI decisions
  2. Meeting client demand about SRI helps to keep clients loyalty
  3. Meeting client demand about SRI allows for higher fees
  4. Large investors cannot avoid owning polluters. So they try to influence them to pollute less
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Hartzmark & Sussman

Effects about sustainability ratings

A

Investor response to the introduction of sustainability ratings - after introduction of Morningstar rating, funds with high sustainability attracted more assets, and those with low scores attracted less

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Hartzmark & Sussman

Reasons for SI

A
  1. Are institutional investors bound by regulation or other limits? → No
  2. Do better ESG scores coincide with higher realized returns? → No, actually its vice-versa
  3. Do investors expect a better risk-return ratio from more globes? → Yes
  4. Is it only about the money expected? → No, people also expect ESG results for better scored SRI funds
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Krüger et al

Conclusion 4

Main reasons for ESG investment

A

For the planet

Because of the law

For better investment results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Riedl & Smeets

Conclusion 1

(..), (..) and (..) explain socially responsible investment

If they are convinced that SRI has social impact they will be (..), but not more than usual

A

Social preferences, personality, and social signaling

More likely to invest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Krüger et al

Purpose

A

The importance of climate risks for institutional sustainable investors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Krüger et al

Problem

A
  • Sample bias
  • Population are investors that participate at ESG conferences
  • Low R^2
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Krüger et al

Method

A

Survey regarding:
1. Investment decisions and opinions

  1. Risk management
  2. Shareholder engagement
  3. View of asset pricing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Krüger et al

Method

  1. Investment decisions and opinions
A
  • Ranking the risks importance (environmental was chosen as most important)
  • Expectations about climate change (majority chose up to 2-3 degrees)
  • Climate risks motivation (reputation and moral ethic most important)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Krüger et al

Method

  1. Risk management
A

How investors manage climate risk:

Analyze, Make investment choices (less important exclusion)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Krüger et al

Method

  1. Shareholder engagement
A
  • Discuss with management regarding financial implications on climate risk
  • Propose action to reduce climate risk
  • Vote against management on proposal over climate risk issues
  • Voting against reelection of any board directors due to climate risk issues
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Krüger et al

Method

  1. View of asset pricing
A

Is the climate risk priced into stocks?

o No, because a lot of carbon emitting industries are overvalued

o ESG heavy investors think that fossil stocks are particularly overvalued (biased)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Riedl & Smeets

Purpose

A

Why retail investors (people) hold socially responsible mutual funds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Riedl & Smeets

Data

A

Robeco clients

Portfolio characteristics; Risk preferences; Social preferences; Individual characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Riedl & Smeets

Problems

A

Small dataset, not-strong results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Krüger et al

Conclusion 1

Long-term, larger, and ESG investors, consider (..), rather than (..) , a better approach for addressing climate risks

A

Risk management and engagement

Divestment

17
Q

Krüger et al

Conclusion 2

Long-term and ESG aware investors care more about (..) and invest more in it

A

Climate risks

18
Q

Krüger et al

Conclusion 3

The group of institutional investors that takes climate risk seriously is (..)

A

Large and growing

19
Q

Riedl & Smeets

Conclusion 2

Investors are (..) to own a single SRI fund if they think that SRI funds underperform

A

Less likely

20
Q

Riedl & Smeets

Conclusion 3

(..) do not determine SI

A

Financial motives

21
Q

Riedl & Smeets

Conclusion 4

Socially responsible investors expect to (..)
funds than on conventional funds and (..)

A

Earn lower returns on SRI

Pay higher management fees

22
Q

Riedl & Smeets

Conclusion 5

(..) is not perceived as different

A

Riskiness

23
Q

Riedl & Smeets

Conclusion 6

Investors - not rational, they want to (..) (not in line with CAPM)

A

Forgo financial performance for social

24
Q

Riedl & Smeets

Conclusion 7

(..) and (..) are not substitutes, those who donate more, invest more in SRI funds

A

Charities and SRI