Non-fatal - legal principle Flashcards

1
Q

R v Nelson (2013)

A

Provides definition of assault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

R v Ireland ( 1997)

A

Silence can constitute actus reus of assault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v Constanza (1997)

A

Words can constitute actus reus of assault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Smith v Woking (1983)

A

For assault, immediate unlawful force means imminent, not necessarily instantaneous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Collins v Willcock (1984)

A

Force can be slight to form actus reus of battery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Wood (Fraser) v DPP (2008)

A

Force can be slight to form actus reus of battery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Thomas (1985)

A

Touching a person’s clothing is akin to touching them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

DPP v K (1990)

A

Indirect acts can form actus reus of battery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Miller (1954)

A

Defined ABH: ‘any injury or hurt calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the victim’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

T v DPP (2003)

A

Temporary loss of consciousness is ABH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v Chan Fook (1994)

A

Psychiatric injury is ABH AND ABH injuries need not be permanent but must be more than trivial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

DPP V Smith (Michael) (2006)

A

Cutting ‘significant amount’ of hair is ABH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v Savage (1991)

A

Men rea for ABH is same as mens rea for common assault - intent or subjective recklessness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

JCC v Eisenhower (1983)

A

Internal bleeding does not constitute a wound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R v Burstow (1997)

A

Serious psychiatric injury can constitute GBH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

R v Bollom (2004)

A

Severity of injuries assessed based on V’s age and health

17
Q

R v Morrison (1989)

A

s.18 resisting arrest = intent, subsequent injury can be reckless

18
Q

R v Taylor (2009)

A

Intent to wound not enough for s.18

19
Q

R v Dica (2004)

A

Transmitting HIV is GBH