11: Enforcing Covenants and Remedies Flashcards
(151 cards)
What is a leasehold covenant?
Promises made by the landlord and tenants to each other. These are different to restrictive covenants. E.g. to pay rent, be responsible for maintenance.
Which piece of legislation governs leasehold covenants?
Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995.
What is the difference between an ‘old’ and a ‘new’ lease?
Pre 1996: Old leases
Post 1996: New leases
Due to the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995.
When did the LT(C)A 1995 come into force?
From 1996 onwards, leases were then referred to from 1996 as a ‘new’ lease.
What is ‘privity of contract’?
Where the landlord and tenant have agreed to a contract with each other - if one breaks a contractual term, they may be sued by the other.
What is ‘privity of estate’?
Where a landlord and tenant relationship exists between them. Privity of estate refers to the legal relationship that two parties bear when their estates constitute one estate in law.
Can a landlord sue the original tenant if the assignee has not paid their rent in an old lease?
Yes, because there is privity of contract between the original tenant and the original landlord, which makes the tenant liable for the defaults of assignees.
Can a landlord sue the original tenant if the assignee has not paid their rent in a new lease?
No, in respect for leases granted after 1 January 1996, the previous rules, which made the original tenant liable for the defaults of assignees, cease to apply.
Which 3 pairs of people are bound by privity of contract?
Landlord and tenants
Tenants and assignees
Landlords and Reversioners
How are landlord and assignees connected?
Through common law, Spencer’s Case [1583], the burden of covenants are attached to the leasehold estate and so bind subsequent assignees.
What are the four criteria for assignees to be liable for the benefit and burden of covenants via Spencer’s Case [1583]?
Legal lease (fulfilling requirements)
Assigned by deed
Privity of estate (relationship over same land)
Touches and concerns the land
Does Spencer’s Case [1583] apply to equitable leases?
No, it does not apply to equitable leases, only legal leases.
Is there privity of estate between landlord or tenant assignees?
Yes, because the assignee merely ‘steps into the shoes’ of the landlord or tenant, so assumes all their rights and obligations. There is no privity of contract between L and A1, but there is privity of estate.
What are the three criteria for when the covenant ‘touches and concerns the land’?
A covenant touches and concerns when it:
only benefits the landlord when they hold the reversion.
affects the nature, quality and mode of user or value of land.
is not expressed to be personal.
For old leases pre 1996, how is the fact that tenants were still liable for non-payment from their assignees mitigated?
Via implied rights of indemnity via either:
s77 LPA 1925
Moule v Garrett [1872]
What does s77 Law of Property Act 1925 provide for?
For old leases pre 1996, it provides that any assignment of a lease for valuable consideration shall be deemed to include an indemnity in favour of the assignor by the assignee. It therefore can create a chain of indemnity.
Does s77 LPA 1925 apply to both the assignment and reversion of the lease?
No, s77 LPA 1925 (this method of indemnity) applies only to an assignment of the lease, not the reversion.
What does Moule v Garrett [1872] provide for?
It provides the quasi-contractual right of indemnification, meaning that if the tenant T had assigned to A1 and A1 then assigned to A2, the tenant T, if sued for non-payment of rent by the landlord, could claim directly against A2.
How are reversioners and tenants connected?
Through s141 and s142 LPA 1925.
What is the difference between s141 and s142 LPA 1925?
s141: Reversioner takes the benefit of the tenant’s obligations by virtue of s141.
s142: Reversioner suffers the burden of the landlord’s obligations by virtue of s142.
Which condition must the covenants meet in s141 and s142 LPA 1925 in order for a reversioner to take the benefit and burden?
The covenants must have reference to the subject-matter of a lease.
What does the covenant needing to ‘reference the subject-matter of a lease’ mean?
It is the same as ‘touch and concern the land’, so it must be related directly to the land/property.
Can reversioners sue for past breaches in old leases?
Yes, reversioners can sue for past breaches, even if they did not hold the reversion at the time of the breach.
In the picture below, how is there a relationship between R and A3?
There is no contractual relationship between R and A3. The various leasehold covenants will be mutually binding, however, if the four conditions in Spencer’s Case are satisfied (so the leasehold covenants run to A3) and the benefit and burden of the leasehold covenants have run to R under ss141 and 142 LPA 1925