11.1 Intermolecular forces Flashcards
(37 cards)
Intermolecular Forces: Between different molecules
* We don’t use intermolecular forces to talk about ionic compounds: All the ions are held together by ionic bonds
* we use it to talk about covalently bound moelcules
* network covalents also arent held togethe by intermolecular forces
When you have covalent bonds, thats talking about whats binding the actual molecule together.
* However, whats holding all these molecules together (like molecule to molecule) are the intermolecular forces, and these are much weaker binds than the covalent bonds
Intermolecular forces = way weaker than an ionic or covalent bond
* Like 25-100 times weaker
So as a result of the intermolcular forces being so weak compared to ionic, the covalent compound structures tend to be held together much less strongly than an ionic compound or a network covalent
* Not talking about the actual covalent bonds in the molecules, but the intermolecular forces that hold covalent molecules togther are weak, meaning covlanet molecular sturcutres dont hold together that well compared to ionic compounds and network covalent compounds
Intermolcular forces:
* Hydrogen bonding - strongest
* Dipole-Dipole Forces - middle
* London Disperson Forces -weakest
* Ion Dipole forces
NOTE: these rules are true for molecules that are similar in size. However, if the molecules differ in size it changes
Dipole-Diple Forces
* Only present when theres polar molecules that create partial charges
NOTE: hydrogen bonding is like a super strong dipole-dipole
So this is showing a dipole dipole fore
Basically since theres a large electronegativity difference between the H and Cl it creates a partial charge (Cl is negative because its holding that electron closer most of the time)
* So the covalent bond between hydrogen and chlorine is strong, however the intermolecule force between the partial negative charge on the Cl and the partial positive charge on the H is weaker
* It makes since that this dipole-dipole intermolecular force is weaker than an ionic bond, because ionic bonds are full charges, attracting to each other, while these are only partial charges interacting with one another.
The bigger the electronegativity delta between the two covalently bound atoms, the bigger the partial charges = stronger intermolecule dipole dipole force because were now working w/ bigger partial charges (appraoching 1, but never actually quite at 1)
Hydrogen Bonding:
* Like a super strong Dipole-Dipole force
Has to have hydrogen interacting w/ N,O,F
* it needs to be bound to these
* it has to be bound to these atoms because theyre very small and very electronegative
* so N and Cl are basically tied for their electronegativity, however, because N is smaller it works with hydrogen bonding
Must be either
* F-H, O-H, N-H somewhere in the structure
Water does hydrogen bonding
So again, we classify it as hydrogen bonding instead of dipole-dipole, because this intermolecular force is so much stronger than any of the other dipole-dipole forces even though its the same idea
That lone pair is what interacts, but for it to be a hydrogen bond it has to be a Hydrogen bound to an N,O,F. And that hydrogen has to be interacting with another N,O,F bound to a hydrogen
hydrogen bond acceptor: atom w/ F/O/N w/ lone pairs = hydrogen bond acceptor
Hydrogen bond donor: The molecular that has the hydrogen thats involved in the interaction thats bound to a N/O/F = hydrogen bond donor
So in water below you can see every oxygen has two lone pairs, which means that it could act as a hydrogen bond acceptor twice
Every water molecular has two hydrogens bound to an oxygen, meaning it can act as a hydrogen bond donor up to 2 times as well
So every water molecular has the chance to be interacting with up to 4 other water molecules
NOTE: the molecular below would not be capable of hydrogen bonding. The hydrogen and oxygen need to be directly bound to get the delta in electrongeativity. We don’t see that here
Why N-O-F do hydrogen bonding, but Cl (which has the same electronegativity has N) doesnt:
Hydrogen bonding happens when two things are true
1) High electronegativity difference between H and the atoms its bound to
2) Very small atomic radius of the electronegative atom (N, O, F only) - Cl is much bigger which is why it isnt involved in hydrogen bonding
Cl has a larger atomic radii, meaning its electron cloud is spread out over a larger volume
* So the negative chrage is more diffuse - not tightly packed in one spot.
Lond disperson forces:
* electrons rotate around the atom, meaning sometimes some places are more negative than in other places
When the atom/molecule interacts with another molecule that has its electrons rotated in the opposite orientation one will be a little negative and the other will be a little bit positive, and we will have an interaction
Then the electrons continue rotating and the attraction is gone
So they have a temporary dipole, but not a perm one
So by one having its electrons in one orientation, it can make the molecule near it put its electrons in the opposuite orietantion makign a temporarry attractive force
* can also be called an induced dipole
All molecules have london disperson forces because they all have electrons
London disperson forces dependent on 2 things
1) Size - bigger molecules = more electrons = greater chance of having london disperson forces
* This is the more important one
2) Surface area
* more surface over which these forces interact
Bigger molecules = more london disperson forces
* all molecules have these
Size = a function of molecular weight
* if its like a difference of more than 20% in molecular weight then size is a deciding factor in which ones make stronger bonds
Ion dipole forces:
* typically stronger than hydrogen bonding
* these are between a polar molecule w/ a dipole and an ion - doesnt even seem like an actual intermolecualr force
These always have a mixture because they’re between an ion and something w/ a partial charge
* so they could never be a pure substance
The smaller the ions the greater the strength of the bond
Also affected by charge strengths
* the more positive the cation, the bigger the interaction
* the most negativiely charged anion = bigger interaction
below showing an ionic compound dissolved in water
However, note sometimes hydrogen bonding can be stronger than these, but not typically.
A question might come up asking about pure substances. Hydrogen bonding is the strongest intermolecular force in pure substances.
* ion dipole forces not considered a pure susbstance (meaning all of the same compound) because they include an ion and something thats polar (not an ion), meaning they can’t be a pure substance
Boiling point: going from liquid to gas
* basically you’re going from lots of intermolecular forces, to basically no intermolecular forces
* the stronger these intermolecular forces are the more energy it takes to break them. = higher boiling point
Greater intercoluar forces = higher boiling point
* so we might get a question that asks “what has the highest boiling point” and we’d have to find the ones w/ the strongest intermolecular forces and that would be our answer
* it would have the highest melting point as well, because you’re still having to break some of those intermolecular forces. However w/ the boiling point you’re basically breaking all of those intermolecular forces.
Enthalpy of vaporization: Amount of heat at that it takes to break those intermolecular forces to go from liquid to gas
* This is going to be higher for something w/ greater intermolecular force strength
Increased viscosity w/ increased intermolecular forces
* this is something thats thicker and moves slower (think honey vs water)
* greater intermolecular forces = more friction between the layers = more they all want to flow together = more viscus
Greater intermolecular forces = greatest surface tension
* this is basically the force to puncture the water
higher intermolecular forces = lower vapor pressure
vapor pressure = what fraction of the molecules in a liquid have jumped into the gas phase
* so if those intermolecular forces are lower, they need less KE to jump out of the liquid phase and more into the gas phase
Less sticky molecules = easier to jump out.
higher intermolecular force = lower vapor pressure
as you heat a substance up, you’re going to be getting more vapor, because you’re giving more average KE to the molecules.
* a greater percentage will have enough to get up into the vapor phase
Below you can see the more you heat something up the more vapor pressure you have
if you want to boil water, the vapor pressure has to = its external pressure (1 atm pushing down on it) so at 100C thats when the molecules get enough KE to = ATM pressing down on them and overcome it to jump into the vapor phase
so vaporization is lower at higher altitiudes because theres less than an ATM pushing down on it. So you basically don’t need as much heat to get it into the vaporization phase
When vapor pressure reaches the external pressure (1 ATM) thats when the substance boils
Which has the highest intermolcular forces?
Well they’re all hydro carbons, meaning they’re all non polar bonds (because carbon has a low electornegativity and so does H)
* so none are dipole-dipole / hydrogen bonding
So that leaves us London disperson, and the last one if the biggest, meaning it has the propinceity for have the largest london disperson force
* so that last one has the highes inermolecular forces
Which one has the greatest intermolcular forces
The last one has hydrogen bonding = biggest intermolecular force
draw these out, the first one has both H and F but they arent bound
which one has the strongest intermolecular forces
The last one because the carbon F bound is polar, meaning it has dipole-dipole
however, you need to check molecular weights. They’re all similar so the dipole-dipole is the strongest. However, if one was way bigger it would be the strongest.
Which one has the strongest intermolecular forces
I like this example.
The last one
While CH3F is polar, meaning it has dipole dipole
However CH3CH2CH3 is much bigger and the london forces are super strong. Meaning it has th ebiggest intermolecular forces, even though it doesnt have dipole-dipole forces
So say one molecule is like 15% bigger and doesnt have dipole-dipole while the smaller one does. Well the london one thats bigger is still stronger
however, it needs to be like 30% bigger to overcome a smaller molecular w/ hydrogen bonding (because this is a much stronger intermolecular force)