1.1.2 Social-Milgram Flashcards

1
Q

What was Milgrams Aim

A

To find out naïve participants would obey orders from an authority that went against their values; specifically, to see if they would deliver electric shocks to a confederate sufficiently powerful to kill someone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was Milgrams original sample

A

40 participants, all men aged 20-50 all Americans. They were recruited through volunteer sampling: Milgram posted newspaper ads and they were paid $4 for turning up to a “study of memory”. Which was a lie.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was Milgrams procedure

A
  1. 40 participants were chosen from volunteers.Fixed draw was conducted to see who would be learner and who would be teacher-Teacher was always real participant (given 45v trial shock) and the confederate was the learner
  2. The teacher sat in front of an a electrical shock generator that ranged from 15v(slight shock) to 450v(xxx) and it went up in 15v increments
  3. The learner who was getting shocked had pre determined responses
    - Gave wrong answers to every correct one
    - At 300v they pounded the wall and produced no more responses(Teacher told that no answer is wrong answer)
  4. Verbal prods were used to encourage participant to be obedient
    - Please continue
    - please go on
    - you must continue
  5. It stopped when the participant refused to continue or reached 450v
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was Milgrams result

A

All participants were obedient to 300v.
65% carried on to 450v shock at the end.
Participants showed serious signs of stress
-Shaking
-trembling
-Some even nervously laughed
On completion many obedient participants showed observable signs of relief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was Milgrams conclusion

A

Ordinary people in the right situation will do immoral acts

People will obey if the figure is perceived to be legitimate authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was milgrams 3 main variations

A
Rundown office block (experiment 10)
Telephonic instructions (experiment 7)
Ordinary man gives orders (experiment 13)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain Milgrams experiment 7 telephonic instructions

A

Milgram was seeing if distance from authority affects obedience.
Teacher gave instructions at the start then left and delivered prods and everything else over telephone.
obedience went down to 22.5% and some participants lied about shocks.Physical presence of authority is important

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain milgrams experiment 10 Rundown office block (Bridgeport)

A

Milgram wanted to see if location was important for obedience because he did original in yale
Same procedure except participants that the research was done for a private research firm and it as conducted in a run down office in Bridgeport
Obedience droped to 45.5% Milgram didn’t believe this was significant enough.He thought setting is not as important for obedience as status of authority figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evaluate Milgrams original study

A

GENERALISABILITY (good) - Original study has bad generalisability as its only 40 men however milgram did many studies so good generalisability

RELIABILITY (good) - Standardised procedure with the same prods and multiple variations

APPLICATION (Good) - Shows how obedience can be bad like hollocaust

VALlDITY (Bad) - Lack of ecological validity as it was done in a lab

ETHICS (Bad) - Milgram deceived participants and to some extent removed the right to withdraw he also lied about aim saying it was a memory and learning study however an extensive debrief was given

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly