18- Post-war central and eastern Europe (support... 1945-68) Flashcards

1
Q

Give an overview of what happened in several Eastern European states between the years 1945 and 1968

A
  • The years 1945 to 1968 saw several states within Eastern Europe attempt to protest against and/or to reform the governments which ruled them.
  • Although none of these protests were successful in fundamentally challenging Communist rule, the consequences were to have profound effects for Eastern Europe and for the Soviet Union itself.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What characteristics did the countries of the Eastern bloc share by 1950?

A
  • They were all police states with secret police organisations modeled on the KGB and reinforced by informers
  • All were one party states; although elections took place only ‘official’ candidates were allowed to stand in elections.
  • Media and education was controlled
  • State propaganda underpinned the system
  • Personality cults developed around the leaders
  • The ruling paries followed the lead of the Soviet Union in economic and social polices; they all took the Soviet version of Marxist-Leninsm with its belief in an ultimately classless society as the ultimate goal and all followed the dictates of Soviet foreign policy
  • Ultimately regimes were kept in power by oppression; the threat of Soviet intervention remained in the background.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Despite the control and repression that took place in Eastern bloc states, theree were challenges to this system in ___

A

East Germany, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and Poland between 1950 and 1968

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How successful were the challenges to the system in states like East Germany, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and Poland between 1950 and 1968?

A
  • None of these challenges were successful in fundamentally changing the system, and Communist rule remained secure.
  • Nevertheless, the suppression of each protest had severe consequences for the country involved, for the Soviet Union itself and, ultimately, for the very survival of Communism.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When was the German Democratic Republic (GDR) established?

A

October 1949

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who was in power after the GDR was established in 1949 and what was this period called?

A
  • Walter Ulbricht became First Secretary of the SED and he remained the most powerful leader of the GDR until 1971.
  • The period 1949 to 1961 was officially labeled ‘the creation of the basis of socialism’.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the SED party in the GDR?

A

The socialist party which had been established before Germany’s split

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the role of the SED party under Ulbricht?

A

It had the role of guiding society through its transition to socialism and remained the dominant party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe the social limitations placed on people in the GDR under the SED

A

Although freedom of speech, the right to strike, freedom of assembly and freedom to practice religion were allowed in theory, in practice such freedoms were subordinated to the building of socialism and its relationship with the USSR.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How did the SED control people?

A
  • The SED sought to control the police and justice system and to ensure that schools taught the new political principles.
  • A secret police was established and the SED infiltrated the mass organisations, such as the Free German Trade Union (FDGB) and the Free German Youth (FDI).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe the economic situation in the GDR (under the SED)

A
  • Agricultural policies were modeled on those established in the USSR by Stalin - collectivisation in agriculture and Five Year Plans for industry.
  • The results of these policies saw industrial output increasing, but also a scarcity of consumer goods and a failure to improve living standards and increase housing.
  • Enforced collectivisation led to 15,000 East German farmers moving to the West and the process led to food shortages and heavy rationing.
  • The general discontent caused by this situation led to the 1953 Uprising.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What were the consequences of the 1953 uprising in the GDR?

A
  • Ulbricht’s position being strengthened and changes being made to the political structure
  • The USSR recognizing the GDR
  • Revealing the attitude of the Western Powers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain how Ulbricht’s position being strengthened was a consequence of the 1953 uprising in the GDR

A
  • Although Ulbricht had been under pressure to soften his reforms before 1953, the USSR now took the view that any thought of liberalising East Germany’s internal politics had to be abandoned.
  • Ulbricht was thus able to use the 1953 rebellion as an excuse to carry out massive political repression.
  • This included 6,000 arrests.
  • Around 20,000 civil servants lost their jobs, as well as 50,000 lesser party members; this included former Social Democrats.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain how the 1953 uprising in the GDR led to changes in the political structure

A
  • The Ministry for State Security (Stasi) was reformed and put under firmer party control.
  • Thus authoritarian rule was consolidated and the rebellions of 1956 which affected Poland and Hungary did not spread to East Germany.
  • Other than a brief period in the 1960s when some criticism was allowed of the worst excesses of Stalinism and West Germans were allowed to visit the East, a hard line was enforced.
  • Intellectuals who urged a more ‘humane socialism’ risked being arrested.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The USSR recognizing the GDR as a consequence of the 1953 uprising

A

The USSR now recognised the GDR which it had not done before as it was clear that it had to build up the GDR diplomatically and economically as a separate entity from West Germany.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The attitudes of the Western powers being revealed as a consequence of the 1953 uprising

A

The failure of the West to intervene seemed to indicate that the Western powers were unwilling to act outside of their own zones.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Describe the economic changes that took place in the GDR after 1953

A
  • Ulbricht continued to develop East Germany’s economy along Soviet lines with Five Year Plans based on heavy industry.
  • However, after the 1953 rising more attention was given to consumer goods.
  • In 1956 a second Five Year Plan proved a failure and was abandoned.
  • In 1959 a Seven Year Plan was introduced.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What was the Seven Year Plan that was introduced in the GDR in 1959 and how did it turn out?

A
  • This plan had ambitious targets in the production of energy, chemicals and development of engineering; Ulbricht predicted that by the end of 1961 the GDR’s economy would have overtaken that of West Germany.
  • However, this plan was also abandoned; it’s economy continued to grow at about 3% but this was low compared to the 8% of the FRG.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Describe the reason for and the reality of the growing emigration of East German workers to the west between 1950 and 1961

A
  • The state of the economy was the main reason for the growing emigration of East German workers to the West.
  • During the period 1950 to 1961 the population of East Germany fell from 18.5 million to just over 17 million.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What was the effect of the growing emigration of East German workers to the west between 1950 and 1961?

A

This undermined East Germany economically as it lost its best workers; it also undermined it ideologically as it proved that East Germans preferred the West to their own country.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

When was the Berlin Wall built?

A

1961

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

How did the building of the Berlin Wall benefit the GDR?

A
  • The haemorrhage of labour ended
  • The government could now plan it’s economic polices knowing that it had a guaranteed labour supply
  • The wall also increased stability inside the GDR since many East Germans now had to come to terms with life in the GDR and worked to make the best of it rather than consider emigrating to the West; previously the scale of emigration to the West had called into question the legitimacy of the country.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What influence did the Soviet Union have on the GDR between 1945 and 1968?

A
  • The economic and political system followed that of the Soviet Union
  • Ulbricht’s government was dependent on the Soviet Union as seen by the Soviet intervention in the 1953 uprising and the Soviet Union’s backing for the building of the wall.
  • It was a member of the Warsaw Pact and its own army, the National People’s Army of NVA was supported by the Soviets as East Germany was on the ‘front line’ of Cold War tensions and so had to be well-armed.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What had Ulbricht hoped for with the Berlin Wall?

A
  • He had hoped for a harder line against the West.

- He had hoped that the West would be pushed out of Berlin and that East Germany would have sovereignty over Berlin.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Although the building of the Berlin Wall didn’t satisfy all of Ulbricht’s hopes, it did have positive effects for the GDR, which Ulbricht had personally pressed for, such as ___

A
  • Successfully stabilised the GDR’s economy as already mentioned and was his most enduring legacy - along with recognition of the GDR’s existence as a state in its own right.
  • Ulbricht fought to achieve this throughout the 1950s and 1960s, and he would not establish diplomatic relations with the West Germans until they recognised the sovereign status of the GDR.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

How did Ulbricht feel about the improved relations between West Germany and the USSR?

A
  • He was unhappy about the improved relations between West Germany and the USSR in 1970 which confirmed Germany’s postwar borders.
  • His opposition meant that he was replaced as first secretary by Erich Honecker in May 1971.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

When was Ulbricht replaced by Honecker?

A

May 1971

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

When was Gomulka the leader of Poland?

A

Between 1956 and 1970

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Why did the situation in regard to Poland at the end of WW2 get particularly complex?

A
  • Due to its geographical location.
  • At the start of the war it had been carved up between Germany and the Soviet Union as part of the Nazi Soviet Pact, and during the war it lost 6 million – which was proportionally more than any other country.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Describe how the communists rose to power in Poland

A
  • Despite the efforts of Churchill in particular to establish free elections in Poland and allow a range of parties, by 1947 the communist Polish Party had gained supremacy via the use of salami tactics as discussed elsewhere.
  • In addition, purges were used to clamp down on dissent both within and outside of the Party.
  • Ninety-seven concentration camps were identified in Poland by the early 1950s.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

When did Boleslaw Beirut die and who took over?

A

Boleslaw Beirut died unexpectedly in 1956, Khrushchev nominated Edward Ochab to take over and to implement destalinisation.

32
Q

What did the Secret Speech lead to in Poland?

A

Many Poles started to demand more political freedom and national sovereignty.

33
Q

Describe the opposition to communism that took place in June 1956 and what this led to

A
  • Workers in the industrial city of Pozan revolted.
  • In the next few months the Polish communist Gomulka, who had been outlawed in Stalin’s day, was brought back to political prominence (without Khrushchev’s approval).
  • He represented the reformist wing of the Party and he implemented a rapid de-Stalinisation programme.
34
Q

Describe the events that took place in Poland in October of 1956

A
  • Khrushchev flew to Warsaw and Soviet military forces moved into a threatening position.
  • However, Gomulka refused to be intimidated by Khrushchev, even threatening to arm the Polish workers and resist the Soviets.
  • Importantly, however, Gomulka also told Khrushchev that he had no intention of taking Poland out of the Warsaw Pact.
  • This calmed Khrushchev’s fears and he agreed that Gomulka could remain if he agreed not to carry our reforms that might threaten local communist rule, or the unity of the Soviet bloc.
35
Q

Explain how Gomulka telling Kruschev that he had no intention of taking Poland out of the Warsaw Pact etc. (see previous flashcard) gained him support

A
  • Gomulka succeeded in relaxing the Soviet stranglehold over Poland; thousands of Soviet officers who had been serving with the Polish Army had been sent home and he insisted that any Soviet troop movements on Polish soil should first be approved by the Poles.
  • Thus Gomulka received the support of many Poles because he had preserved a Polish path to socialism rather than conforming to Soviet views.
36
Q

Why does Tony Judt believe that Khruschev let Gomulka remain in power? (1956)

A

Tony Judt writes that ‘Khrushchev had read [Gomulka] well…The price of Communist control in Poland might be some personnel changes and liberalization of public life, but Gomulka was a sound Party man and had no intention of abandoning power to the streets or to the Party’s opponents’.

37
Q

What factor played a role in Khruschev’s decision not to use force in Poland in 1956?

A

Khrushchev was mindful of the fact that the Chinese were supporting the Polish Communist Party

38
Q

Why did the potential for further protest remain in Poland after 1956?

A

Despite Gomulka’s initial success in restoring order and stability though compromise, his failure to address fundamental issues such as social organisation and freedom, combined with the fact that the independent Catholic Church remained a powerful independent force, meant that the potential for further protest remained.

39
Q

What changes took place in Poland in the 1960s?

A

The underlying tensions in Polish society started to re-emerge as improvements in the standard of living failed to materialise and censorship was strengthened.

40
Q

What happened in Poland in 1966?

A

There was a direct clash between the communists and the Polish church when it was accused of undermining Poland’s national interests when they wrote to their German counterparts in Germany to seek reconciliation for the events of the Second World War.

41
Q

What happened in Poland in 1968?

A

A production of the strongly anti-Russian 19th Century play ‘The Forefathers’ encouraged student protest against the communist government and this led to calls for a general strike.

42
Q

Describe the protests that took place in Poland in 1968

A
  • At the same time as the Czechoslovakian uprising was starting, violent clashes took place in Warsaw between students and police.
  • As with Czechoslovakia, it looked as though Soviet military action might be needed to restore order.
43
Q

What political changes took place as a result of the 1968 protests in Poland?

A
  • Gomulka’s position was threatened and he also faced opposition from a Polish General, Mieczyslaw Moczar.
  • Nevertheless, order was restored without Soviet military intervention.
  • The USSR, already dealing with events in Czechoslovakia, continued to support Gomulka.
44
Q

How were the protests in Poland different from those in Hungary?

A

Khrushchev did not compromise over Hungary and here it became clear that Khrushchev was as determined as Stalin to maintain Soviet control over the satellite states.

45
Q

How did the protests in Poland influence those in Hungary?

A

News of the Polish success had spread to Hungary where people lived under the repressive regime of Rákosi.

46
Q

Describe Rakosi’s rule in Hungary

A

Under Rákosi some 480 public figures had been executed between 1948 and 1953 and over 150,000 people had been imprisoned.

47
Q

Describe the protests in Hungary (date?)

A

Crowds took to the streets and demanded that Rákosi be replaced with the more moderate Imre Nagy.

48
Q

How did Khrushchev respond to the riots in Hungary and what did this lead to?

A
  • Khrushchev agreed to this but riots continued.
  • Khrushchev ordered the Red Army to restore order, but surprisingly it failed to achieve this and Nagy was able to negotiate the withdrawal of Soviet forces on 28th October.
  • Shortly afterwards he announced that Hungary would leave the Warsaw pact and become a neutral state.
  • He was also planning to share power with non-Communist groups.
49
Q

How did Khruschev and the Soviets respond to Nagy’s actions regarding sharing power with non-Communist groups and leaving the Warsaw Pact?

A
  • Khrushchev could not tolerate this.
  • Aware that the attention of the West was focused on the Suez crisis, the Soviet forces launched a general offensive against the Hungarians.
50
Q

Describe the general offensive that the Soviets launched against the Hungarians

A
  • There was bitter fighting in the streets of Budapest.
  • About 3,000 Hungarians and 7,000 - 8,000 Russians were killed.
  • In addition, 200,000 Hungarians fled the country in the following weeks and months.
51
Q

What did the fighting in Russia (Soviet offensive) lead to?

A
  • The Soviets were successful in bringing Hungary back under their control.
  • A new government under Janos Kádár was created; Nagy was later executed by the Russians.
52
Q

Describe the Americans’ involvement in the Hungarian revolt and the reasons for this

A
  • The Hungarian revolt had been encouraged by CIA broadcasts on Radio Free Europe which led Hungarians to believe that they would get American support.
  • However, the Americans made it clear to the Soviet leaders that the US would take no action to save Nagy.
  • It is true that their attention was being diverted by the Suez crisis, but there is no evidence that Eisenhower ever considered interfering in Hungary.
  • This was because he believed (probably mistakenly) that Khrushchev may well have been prepared to risk nuclear war rather than lose this satellite state.
53
Q

How was the political structure in Poland after the revolts different from that in Hungary?

A
  • In Poland, the communist Party retained control of affairs while in Hungary they lost control
  • Nagy’s decision to declare Hungary a neutral state would have meant the exclusion of Soviet influence and a weakening of the defensive ring of states established on its Western borders since 1944.
54
Q

What did Khrushchev’s actions in Hungary (revolts) show?

A
  • That de-Stalinisation did not mean a softening of the USSR’s fundamental attitude.
  • When the Communist Party was in danger of losing control over state machinery or where its control of the Eastern bloc was challenged it was prepared to use whatever pressure was necessary to pull the satellites back into line.
55
Q

Describe Kádár’s rule after the Hungarian revolts

A
  • Kádár was more prepared to toe the Soviet line; he ended any ideas of a multi-party regime or of leaving the Warsaw Pact.
  • He also oversaw the brutal repression of Nagy and his supporters, most of whom were tried and executed in 1957-58.
56
Q

Even with Kádár’s rule, there were some ___

A
  • Concenssions

- E.g. ‘goulash communism’ & more freedoms

57
Q

What was ‘goulash communism’?

A

During the mid-1960s, Kádár’s government began to implement what became known as ‘goulash communism’: an economic policy that combined centralised socialism with free-market principles.

58
Q

Describe the freedoms that were given to people under Kádár’s government

A
  • Kádár stated that “he who is not against us is with us” thus implying that active support was not necessary. (This was in contrast to Rákosi who had declared that “he who is not with us is against us”)
  • Kádár gradually lifted Rákosi’s more draconian measures against free speech an a relaxation of censorship of foreign books and films, more opportunities in higher education and he also succeeded in making Hungary economically less dependent on the Soviet Union.
59
Q

What did Kádár giving people more freedoms and making Hungary less economically dependent on the Soviet Union lead to?

A
  • Hungary’s standards of living improved significantly and Kádár became popular with his own people.
  • He avoided a personality cult and there was some political change; in 1966 contested elections were allowed in Hungary in place of the single Party list - though all candidates had to be ‘approved’.
60
Q

Who was the leader of Czechoslovakia from 1957?

A

Antonín Novotný

61
Q

Describe Novotný and life under his rule

A
  • He was a hardliner, disliked for his promotion of Czech rather than Slovak interests.
  • Novotný’s 1960 constitution abolished most Slovak institutions on the premise that internal national rivalries were no longer relevant.
  • He had also resisted attempts by destalinisers to initiate economic reform and rehabilitate victims of the purges.
  • However, he had enemies within the party who forced him to resign in 1968.
62
Q

Who was Novotný’s successor?

A

Alexander Dubček

63
Q

What was Dubček’s stance towards communism?

A

He was a loyal Communist and considered himself a loyal ally of the USSR.

64
Q

How did Novotný’s fall from power change the political situation in Czechoslovakia?

A
  • It increased pressure for change from Dubček’s more radical supporters.
  • Thus, in April 1968 the Party published its ‘Action Programme’.
  • This aimed to create ‘socialism with a human face’ and to build a ‘new profoundly democratic model of Czechoslovak socialism, conforming to Czechoslovak conditions’.
65
Q

How did Novotný’s fall from power change the social situation in Czechoslovakia?

A
  • There were also to be wider powers for trade unions, expansion of trade with the West and freedom to travel abroad.
  • In June Dubček even abolished censorship and encouraged criticism of the government.
66
Q

How did Dubček act towards the Russians and why?

A

Conscious of what had happened to Hungary in 1956, he was careful to assure the Russians that Czechoslovakia would stay in the Warsaw pact and remain a valuable ally.

67
Q

What led members of teh Warsaw Pact to invade Czechoslovakia and end the Prague Spring?

A
  • Brezhnev and the other leaders of the Warsaw pact became increasingly worried at the events in Prague and decided to resort to force.
  • In August 1968, together with the other members of the Warsaw pact invaded Czechoslovakia and ended the Prague Spring.
  • A new government was installed which was subservient to Moscow.
68
Q

More info needed on Dubcek’s rule?

A
69
Q

In order to justify his actions in Czechoslovakia, Brezhnev laid down what became known as ___

A

‘The Brezhnev Doctrine’:

70
Q

What did the Brezhnev Doctrine state?

A

That he actions of one socialist country affected all; therefore collective action to deal with any threat to the socialist community was justified and necessary.

71
Q

What became clear from the Brezhnev Doctrine and what did this lead to?

A
  • That any attempt at ‘liberalism’ by a state of the Eastern bloc would not be tolerated.
  • As a result, reform plans throughout the regions were abandoned with disastrous economic consequences of the future of the Soviet bloc.
72
Q

Invasion of Czechoslovakia?

A
73
Q

What responses were there to the invasion of Czechoslovakia?

A
  • The invasion of Czechoslovakia seriously damaged the international reputation of Communion and the Soviet Union.
  • Yugoslavia, Albania and China condemned the Soviet action in Western Europe; many communists stopped looking to Moscow for guidance.
  • However, it had no major impact on East West relations. It momentarily slowed down the détente process but did not throw it off course.
74
Q

How did the invasion of Czechoslovakia impact relations within Europe?

A
  • It created instant tensions with the East European nations that had not taken part in the operation.
  • As for the nations remaining in the Soviet-led alliance, the invasion confirmed that autonomous political reforms would no longer be tolerated.
  • In a broader international socialist movement, the invasion seriously damaged Moscow’s ability to build a united front against the Chinese.
75
Q

Historiography?

A