Possession of Drugs Flashcards

1
Q

What is Possession of Drugs and what Section is it contained in?

A

Poession of drugs is contained in S5 Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. The Act categories drugs into 3 categories A,B or C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What must the Prosecution Prove?

A

Physical Possession and knowledge of possession

That what the defendant had in their Possession was a controlled drug. This may be done by scientific analysis.

In cases of straightforward possession, an admission from the defendant will suffice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How is possession established

A

By 2 elements, The defendant must have physical possession of a control drug and must know that he has possession of it.

If someone does not know that they have an item in their possession then they cannot be guilty r v Lambeth 2002

However forgetfulness is no defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Warner v Metropolitan Police Commissioner 1969

A

It was held that the jury should differentiate between possession of the substance rather than mere control.

This should be done by:

  • The manner and Circumstances in which the substances has been received
  • What knowledge or means knowledge or guilty knowledge as to the presence of the substance or as to the nature of what has been received
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Joint Possession

A

Joint Possession will be established if they all have the right to draw from a common pool of drugs.

Mere knowledge of the existence of the drugs is not enough

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

If someone is in possession of an item but does not know it is a controlled drug

A

this would not be a defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

If the drug is so small that they could never be consumed?

A

This does not provide a defence, provided that the prosecution can prove possession and that the drug is ‘visible, tangible, measurable and capable of manipulation’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Mens rea of possession of drugs

A

The defendant knew he was in possession of an item

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how is Section 28(3) of The misuse of the Drugs Act a defence

A

The defendant shall be acquitted if he proves that he neither believed nor suspected nor had reason to suspect that the substance or product in question was a controlled drug

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how is S5(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 a defence

A

If they take possession of a drug for the purpose of preventing another from committing or continuing to commit an offence in connection with that drug

as soon as they took possession of the drugs they took the necessary steps open to him to destroy or to deliver it to the police

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Sentencing

A

Triable either way

Class A
Maximum: 7 years’ custody
Offence range: Fine – 51 weeks’ custody

Class B
Maximum: 5 years’ custody
Offence range: Discharge – 26 weeks’ custody

Class C
Maximum: 2 years’ custody
Offence range: Discharge – Community orde

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is Possession with intent.

A

If a person has drugs in their possession with intent to pass them on to another then they are guilty of an offence.

it does not matter whether they were the owners of the drugs or simply looking after them and it does not matter if they receive payment.

It is the intention of the holder to pass them onto someone else that establishes the offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The defendant thought the drugs were of a different class to that alleged or which were found to be the case

A

This would not be a defence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Defence for possession with intent

A

His intention was to pass the drugs onto a police officer for destruction

Or advise the client to go no comment and read out a statement accepting that he was in possession of the drugs, but it was for personal use rather than supply.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

If the defendant says they were looking after the drugs for a friend

A

this inflates the defence from one of possession to one of possession to intent.

This is because the defendant at that point had control of the drugs, knowingly, and so had possession of them, and his intention was to pass them on to someone else. That would be supply, even though the recipient was originally in control of the drugs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Does supply need to be for commercial basis

A

Whether or not supply is for payment or not it remains a supply.

The fact that no payment is made is matter of mitigation.

Go no comment if this there is social supply

17
Q

What is a Newton hearing

A

A Newton hearing will take place following a guilty plea when he thought he was in possession of Class C, when he was actually in possession of class A.

The burden is on the prosecution to establish their facts in a hearing