Crim Flashcards

1
Q

List the 11 specific intent crimes

A

“Students Can Always Fake A Laugh, Even For Ridiculous Bar Facts”

Solicitation
Conspiracy
Attempt
First-Degree murder
Assault
Larceny
Embezzlement
False Pretenses
Robbery
Burglary
Forgery
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

M’Naughten insanity defense

A

Defendant does not know right from wrong or does not understand his actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Irresistable impulse insanity defense

A

(as the name suggests) an impulse that defendant cannot resist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Durham insanity defense

A

But for the mental illness, defendant would not have done the act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Model Penal Code insanity defense

A

Combination of M’Naghten and irresistible impulse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

A statute in the jurisdiction, which was enacted with the express purpose of preventing public employees from taking advantage of the status of undocumented immigrants, made it a felony to accept money or other benefits in exchange for issuing a state identification card. During an undercover investigation, an undocumented immigrant was recorded offering $500 to a clerk in exchange for issuance of a card. The clerk agreed to the deal and later that day exchanged the card for the money, after which both parties were arrested.

In a jurisdiction following the common law approach to conspiracy, which of the following statements is correct?

(A) The clerk can be convicted of violating the statute and conspiracy to violate the statute, and the undocumented immigrant can be convicted of no crime.
(B) The clerk can be convicted only of violating the statute, and the undocumented immigrant can be convicted of no crime.
(C) The clerk can be convicted only of violating the statute, and the undocumented immigrant can be convicted as an accomplice to violation of the statute.
(D) The clerk can be convicted of violating the statute and conspiracy to violate the statute, and the undocumented immigrant can be convicted of conspiracy to violate the statute.

A

B. When a problem specifies that a statute is intended to protect a class, it is presumed that the class is immune from prosecution under the statute, whatever their conduct. If the immigrant cannot be convicted for conspiracy, that spoils that charge for the clerk too (it takes two to conspire), so all that’s left is the statute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Two-word definition: First-degree murder

A

Premeditated killing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Two-word definition: felony murder

A

Non-premeditated murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Two-word definition: Voluntary manslaughter

A

Provoked killing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Two-word definition: Involuntary manslaughter

A

Negligent killing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Accomplice elements

A

Person who:

  1. Acts with intent (i) to assist the principal AND (ii) that the principal commit a crime
  2. Actually aids/counsels/encourages the principal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Purposefully

A

Conscious object to engage in the proscribed conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Knowingly

A

Awareness that conduct is of a particular nature or will cause a particular result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Recklessly

A

Consciously disregarding a substantial and unjustifiable risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Negligently

A

Failure to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly