L14 - Dealing with Serial Correlation Flashcards

1
Q

How can the Durbin-Watson test give an approximate value for the autocorrelation coefficient?

A
  • if DW is near 0 e.g. 0.1 then we should suspect that autocorrelation possibly exists
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How does autocorrelation effect the Standard Error of β(hat)?

A
  • the Assumed distribution has the normal equation for variance, thus the variance of β(hat) in this case is the red pdf
  • However the true distribution that is subject to serial correlation, has the second variance, giving the blue pdf
  • the regression coefficient isnt biased as E(β(hat))= β (the mean of the sample is centered around β)
  • but the is actually a bias in the SE of the equation causing more variance in the value of β(hat) –> overestimating the true variance as autocorrelation coefficents are of the same sign
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What happens to the OLS pdfs when the autocorrelation coefficients have opposite signs?

A
  • negative signs actually underestimates the true variance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why is biasness in the SE a problem?

A
  • effects the efficiency of the test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the difference between ρ(hat) and Φ(hat)?

A

ρ(hat) –>first order autcorrelation coefficient for the equation residuals

Φ(hat) –> first order autocorrelation coefficient for the X value

  • if you can find these values from the correlogram, you can sub them in the autocorrelation variance equation to get a coefficient for how much larger/small the true variance is than the estimate variance e.g. 8 would mean it is 8 times larger
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How do we correct serial correlation?

A
  • Non-Linear Least squares is used to correct for the presence of serial correlation
  • Used to simultaneously estimate β(slope coefficient) and ρ (autoregressive parameter) –> have to use NLS as OLS can only be used to find out one parameter
  • To get the NLS equation sub the first equation using last period (t-1) into the second equation
  • Athough we have 3 variables, we now only have two coefficients
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the Non-Linear Least Squares Formula?

A
  • cannot take derivatives like in OLS
  • do not need to worry about the Newton method –> software package does it just need to remember the matrix
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

On a graph, what might indicate there is autocorrelation?

A

When there is a trend in the residual and it only changes signs a few times –> when using OLS and normal regression equation

  • most likely positive autocorrelation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the Quasi-differencing method?

A
  • like NLS, they are both mechanical ways of solving auto-correlation, if we already know the autoregressive parameter ρ
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How is the iterative method used in conjuction with the quasi-differencing method to find the AR coefficient?

A
  • can get the estimate for ρ(hat) from the Durbin Watson test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is Common Factor Restriction?

A

Some econometricians have argued against the use of mechanical corrections for autocorrelaiton on the grounds that it imposes untested restriction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How do you test for Common Factor Restriction?

A
  • This is used to see whether or not you can use NLS or Quasi-differencing methods, to see if the restrictions they impose can be used to solve for autocorrelation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What happens when we omit a variable that is serially correlated?

A
  • If we omit a variable from a regression equation that should be included, and that variable is itself serially correlated, the result will be a serially correlated error.
  • In this case OLS will be biased, inefficient and the standard errors of the coefficients will be unreliable.
  • There is little we can do in this case other than go back and respecify the model from the start.
  • Note that if this is the cause of serial correlation then inference based on ‘corrections’ for serial correlation becomes unreliable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly