12 - Key approaches Flashcards
The Canadian Health Measure Survey aims to collect important health information through __________________________________
interview, blood and urine
The CHMS is led by (3):
- Statistics Canada
- Health Canada
- Public Heath Agency of Canada
US NHANES is led by:
the National Center for Health Statistics
Researcher intervenes to change exposure then observes/measures what happens (cause-effect): _____________________
Experimental studies
Researcher observes/measures exposure and outcome (does not manipulate) , environment is not changed, not a true experiment, associations not causations:_______________________
Observational studies
Groups are being compared, aims to associate exposure/intervention and outcome: _________________
Analytical studies
Help identify patterns and generate hypothesis, case report, surveys, fact-finding inquiries, frequency and distribution of single variables:
Descriptive study
Explain case reports:
- They are an in-depth analysis of a single individual, unit or event
- Direct observation and questioning
- Provides considerable detail
- Usually concern rare events
What are 3 challenges associated with case reports?
- Difficult to draw clear causal linkages
- Generalizability of findings
- Potential for observer bias
What are the 3 types of analytical studies?
1) Cohort (prospective)
2) Case-control
3) Cross-sectional
- Characterize (observe) exposures in participants and then track them overtime
- Compared exposed vs controls =
Cohort (prospective)
- Enroll participants with disease or outcome and find matched controls
- Compare previous exposures between groups =
Case-control
- Enroll participants and measure exposures and health simultaneously
- Snapshot =
Cross-sectional
What study is an example of a cohort study?
Nurses Health Study
What are the pros of a cohort study (3):
- can match subjects at baseline
- establish timing of events
- can standardize exposures
What are the cons of a cohort study (4):
- associative study (not causal)
- blinding is difficult
- not randomized
- rare diseases need large sample size and long follow-up
What study is the opposite of a cohort study:
CASE-CONTROL STUDY
Start with an outcome/disease and then work backwards to identify possible causes:
case-control study
What are the pros of a case-control study (3):
- Relatively quick and cheap
- Most feasible for rare disorders or outcomes with long latency period
- Fewer subjects needed than other studies
What are the cons of a case-control study (5):
- Associative study (not causal)
- Reliance on recall and records to determine exposures (past diet??)
- Not randomized
- Control groups hard to find
- Selection bias
Study at one point in time to determine if there’s an association between exposure and health:
Cross-sectional study
What are the pros of a cross-sectional study :
Relatively cheap and simple
What are the cons of a cross-sectional study :
- Associative study (not causal)
- Recall bias problems
- Confounders may be unequally distributed
What tool can you use to make sure you’re doing an observational study the right way?
The STROBE Checklist