1.2 the franchise Flashcards
(49 cards)
What % of the UK does the franchise consist of?
approx 71.5%
Before any franchise extension, what % of the population could vote?
2.7%
What happened in 1832 to extend the franchise?
The Great Reform Act 1832
Came from the emergence of the rising middle class, who were the biggest contributors to the economy
voting rights were extended to 5.6% of the population (about 20% of men) as the vote extended to property owners. It showed how future groups might persuade further change to happen
What happened in 1867 to extend the franchise?
Voting rights extended to skilled workers on the basis of payment of taxes, which doubled the electorate from 1 to 2 million, out of a male adult population of 7 million
What happened in 1918 to extend the franchise?
The representation of the people act 1918
Voting rights extended to all men over 21 and all women over 30
As a result of the suffragettes and suffragists action and their efforts in war work, showing they were responsible
Also allowing men who had fought in the first world war to vote
What aspects of life changed for women which helped them to get the vote in 1918
-more job opportunities like teachers and nurses
-many men lost lives overseas
-gov afraid of suffragettes being violent again
-David Lloyd George was far more supportive of the idea than Herbert Asquith
What happened in 1928 to extend the franchise?
The representation of the people act 1928
Voting rights for all women over 21. This was thanks to the work of peaceful protests by the suffragists who campaigned for legal and political equality
What happened in 1969 to extend the franchise?
Representation of the people act 1969
This gave 18-21 year old’s the right to vote
This is due to changing attitudes as young people were becoming more financially independent. Arguably, they were increasingly mature, better educated, better technology allowed them to be better informed and 21 no longer served as an arbitary anchroism
Who were the suffragettes?
Organization run by the Pankhurst’s who used violent and illegal methods to protest. It was only open to women
What were the aims of the suffragettes?
secure equal voting rights
to be a group of actions, not words
to focus only on the issue of political equality and nothing else
What methods did the suffragettes use?
-chained themselves to railings
-smashing windows
-setting fire/blowing up buildings
-destroying letters in postboxes
-going on hunger strike
What happened on black Friday?
18th November 1910
A WSPU protest resulted in a fight with police that saw many women physically/sexually assaulted by police
some public felt the police had acted inappropriately but many thought women had brought it upon themselves
What was the Cat and Mouse Act?
The gov was worried that women on hunger strike in prison might die and therefore gain public sympathy
The Cat and Mouse Act 1913 allowed women on the brink of death to be temporarily released in order to gain strength and then return to prison when strong enough
How did violence of the suffragettes help their cause?
-violence was sensationalized and meant the media reported on what was happening, raising public awareness
-regular attacks kept the public fearful
-brutal suppression by the police helped them gain sympathy
-people already put off by them were no more put off
-at the end of the war, the gov were fearful the suffragettes would become violent again
Why did violence not help the suffragettes cause?
-proved women were not responsible enough to have the vote
-the gov couldn’t be seen as giving into terrorism
-violence turned moderate men and women away from the cause
-membership of the WSPU was declining as people turned to the peaceful NUWSS
-the work of the women during the war played a crucial part, not the violence
How did suffragette violence end?
The government could continuously ignore the demands as public opinion turned against them
When war broke out in 1914, the WSPU promised to end their violence and began to help the government organise female workers
What are the key features of the suffragists?
Various movements united by Millicent Fawcett in 1897 as NUWSS
Membership open to all and it was internally democratic
Their protest was peaceful
What was the only aim of the suffragists?
achieve the right to vote for women through constitutional and peaceful means
What is votes at 16?
A coalition of groups who believe the franchise should be extended to 16 and 17 year old’s. This is based on the opinion that 16 and 17 year old’s already have lots of responsibility
What can 16 year old’s legally do?
-join armed forces
-get married
-consent to sexual relations
-pay income tax and national insurance
-leave school and enter work
What are the arguments that 16 year old’s should be able to vote?
-youth participation in Scottish referendum was high
-apathy is the biggest problem the UK faces and engaging people from a younger age would improve political engagement
-lack of education doesn’t prevent adults voting
-young people’s interests can be easily ignored
What are the arguments against 16 year old’s having the right to vote?
-unlikely to be interested or informed
-easily influenced by parents
-less likely to vote, undermining an already low turnout
-young people should enjoy childhood and focus on development
-extending the period when someone cannot vote may increase their desire to vote eventually
-few other countries allow voting at 16
-representation isn’t denied only delayed
-It’s unfair people who have worked their whole life could have their votes outnumbered by people who haven’t started work
What are some of the events in the timeline of votes at 16?
2009- SNP passes a resolution to allow 16/17s the right to vote in an independence referendum
2015- second reading of private member’s bill in HOC to lower age
2015- Scottish Parliament allows 16/17s vote in all Scottish local and parliamentary elections
2017- Lib Dems commit to lower voting age
2019- Labor pledges to reduce age
2020- Welsh Senedd passes legislation allowing them to vote
Why should prisoners be allowed the right to vote?
-removing civic responsibility makes rehabilitation harder
-no evidence loss of vote acts as a deterrent
-the right to vote is fundamental and taking it away alienates them
The ECtHR have ruled the blanket ban is a violation of the human rights act 1998