Week 4 - Intercultural Communication in Serious Illness Flashcards

1
Q

Inequalities: care provision

A
  • Access to good care
  • Assessment and treatment of symptoms
  • Inadequate information
  • Psychological distress
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The dual-needs model of communication

Patients 2 basic needs –>

A

Need to know: COGNITIVE (information) “what’s wrong, what will happen?”

Need to feel known: AFFECTIVE (empathy) “wants to be seen as person behind the illness”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Complaints: communication

A

Lack of caring & lack of respect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Lancet commission on the value of death - “info should be a right for all people and families who wish it”

–> what’s wrong with it and part of what dual-needs model?

A

“Need to feel known” (the dual-needs model of communication)

It is wrong to NOT tell everyone despite their wishes, they need to know what’s the situation!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Incurable treatment aim: “you are going to die, lets talk about quality of life”

A

Tell:
It is important to tell patients, and a survey shows that 99% would like to know it.
The patient (and family) has a chance to prepare for the unavoidable and deal with the mental aspects (stress, depression, anxiety etc)

NOT tell:
To tell children or not is a question of legal aspects.
Psychological effects can increase such as stress, depression, anxiety since it will lead to them living longer not feeling these mental aspects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The whole world doesn’t talk about patients dying

A

E.g., Malaysia, “go home and come back if it gets better” (unconsciously everyone knows the likely outcome without it being said explicitly)

–> “still have faith”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Legal aspects: “two faced”

A
  • Doctor has the duty to inform patient as clearly as possible, if necessary by using an interpreter (art 7: 448)
  • Patient has the right not to know (art 7:449)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Three different attitudes: ???

Turkish/Moroccan attitudes about informing
about diagnosis/prognosis (living in an comparing to other in NL)

A
  1. Patients’ attitude
  2. Relatives’ attitude
  3. Clinicians’ attitude
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Patients attitude:
1. A subset of patients does not want to be informed: ?
2. A subset of patients are indeed not informed: ?
3. The manner of being informed is important: ?

A
  1. elderly
  2. uninformed = Turkish (16-63%), Moroccan (33%)
  3. The Dutch directness of information-provision is disliked
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Relatives attitude:
1. Family plays an important role in (not) informing patients: nr?
2. Reasons preference uninformed: 4?

A
  1. Turkish (39-66%), Morroccan (89%)
    2.
    * upsetting nature
    * believing patients do not want to know
    * might hasten death
    * might stir gossip
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Clinicians attitudes:
1. Clinicians not always inclined to inform patients, depends on several factors
2. Dutch clinicians find it difficult to meet communication needs

A

1a. Turkish oncologists informed patients(67-93%), informed relatives (8-30%)
1b. Turkish physicians more inclined to inform patients w. higher SES/education level
1c. Trained and experienced clinicians more inclined to inform patients

  1. due to patients lack of knowledge & cultural patterns
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Inadequate information: difficulties

A

when families put boundaries on what can/should be communicated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Prognosis: low explicitness vs high explicitness

A

Uncertainty: low explicitly scored higher
Self-efficacy: high explicitly scored higher
Satisfaction: high explicitly scored higher

–> high explicitness is better!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Clinical applications

A
  • Keep culture into consideration
  • Be careful with prognosis
  • Hope for the best, prepare for the worst
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Language barrier: ?

A

Use real interpreter, not children/family members - in healthcare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cultural differences in patient’s need to feel known: Empathy

A

sympathy (ooh, poor you) –> empathy (I understand, I´ve been there)) –> compassion (I´m motivated to help)

17
Q

Against empathy

A

Clinicians demonstrate less empathy, e.g.
social talk, with ethnic minority patients

Lower Socio Economic Status & Nonwhite groups (nonsignificant) experience
lower empathy

18
Q

Evidence-base of specific communication

A

Verbal & Nonverbal

19
Q

Verbal: ?
Nonverbal: ?

A

Verbal: Reassurance
Nonverbal: Eye contact

20
Q

Non-verbal empathy:
–> more important where?
–> how?

A
  • Eastern
  • more eye contact, less physical distance, clinician body oriented to patients, more smiling

–> NOT all cultures appreciate eye-contact!

21
Q

Nonverbal empathy & Culture

Eye contact = ?
Body posture = ?
Smiling = ?

A

Non-western & western basically respond the same!

Eye contact = trust & recommended

Body posture = Medical competence

Smiling = Friendly

22
Q

Japanese replication study (eye contact)

A

Higher levels of eye-contact led to
* Higher ratings of trust
* Higher ratings of compassion