Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

CONTRACT LAW > THE CONTENTS OF A CONTRACT > Flashcards

THE CONTENTS OF A CONTRACT Flashcards

1
Q

WHAT ARE THE THREE DIFFERENT TYPES OF STATEMENTS PARTIES CAN MAKE WHEN NEGOTIATING A CONTRACT?

A
  1. Mere puffs
  2. Representations
  3. Terms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

WHAT ARE ‘MERE PUFFS’?

A

Extravagant claims (i.e ‘this tastes sensational’) which traditionally have no legal effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

WHAT ARE ‘REPRESENTATIONS?

A

Pre-contractual statements intended to persuade the other party to enter into the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

WHAT ARE ‘TERMS’?

A

Statements incorporated into the contract which may be express or implied.

Express terms - clearly and distinctly discussed, stated and agreed by the parties.

Implied term - not been openly considered, but is read into the contract by the courts, by statute or by custom.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

HOW DO THE COURTS DISTINGUISH BETWEEN ‘REPRESENTATIONS’ AND ‘TERMS’?

A

The courts will consider several factors:

  1. The importance attached to the statement
  2. Whether the statement has been reduced to writing
  3. The timing of the statement
  4. Whether the parties involved in the negotiations had any special knowledge or skills
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

HOW IS THE ‘IMPORTANCE OF THE STATEMENT’ RELEVANT TO DISTINGUISHING A ‘REPRESENTATION’ FROM A ‘TERM’?

A

If it can be shown that the person to whom the statement was made would not have entered the contract if the statement had not been made, then it is more likely that the statement will be considered to be a term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

HOW IS ‘PUTTING A STATEMENT IN WRITING’ RELEVANT TO DISTINGUISHING A ‘REPRESENTATION’ FROM A ‘TERM’?

A

If a statement made during contractual negotiations has not been included within any written contract, the court will usually assume that the statement was merely a representation.

However, the court may alternatively consider that this oral statement was intended to be a term of the contract – that the contract is part written and part oral

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

HOW IS THE ‘TIMING OF A STATEMENT’ RELEVANT TO DISTINGUISHING A ‘REPRESENTATION’ FROM A ‘TERM’?

A

The longer the gap between the making of a statement and entering into the contract, the more likely the court is to consider that the statement was not intended to be a term of the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

HOW ARE ‘SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR SKILLS’ RELEVANT TO DISTINGUISHING A ‘REPRESENTATION’ FROM A ‘TERM’?

A

When the person making the statement has relevant specialist knowledge or skills, the courts are more likely to consider that statement to be a term of the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

HOW ARE EXPRESS TERMS DISCOVERED?

A

By considering what the parties said or wrote when they made the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

HOW DO THE COURTS DECIDE WHETHER A STATEMENT IS AN EXPRESS TERM OF CONTRACT?

A

The court will usually need to establish whether the claimant has had notice of the term.

It is convenient to consider issues of notice in two separate situations:

  1. Where a written document, containing contractual terms, has been signed
  2. Where one of the parties attempts to incorporate written terms into an oral contract
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

WHAT IS AN EXCLUSION CLAUSE?

A

This term attempts to restrict, or, in some cases, completely remove a party’s liability in the event of breach of contract, but it can only be valid if it is a term of the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

WHAT IS A LIMITATION CLAUSE?

A

This term attempts to cap, or limit, the total amount for which a party might be liable in the event of a breach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

WHAT IS THE RULE IN L’ESTRANGE V F GRAUCOB LTD [1934] IN RESPECT OF SIGNED WRITTEN DOCUMENTS CONTAINING CONTRACTUAL TERMS?

A

The written details are usually deemed to be part of the contract, whether or not that have been read by the signatories; this therefore shows the importance of ‘always reading the small print’ before signing anything, as you are likely to be bound by any terms contained in that document.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

WHAT ARE THE LIMITED EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE IN L’ESTRANGE V F GRAUCOB LTD [1934] IN RESPECT OF SIGNED WRITTEN DOCUMENTS CONTAINING CONTRACTUAL TERMS?

A

Where a signature was obtained as a result of a mistake, or by misrepresentation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

HOW CAN WRITTEN TERMS BE INCORPORATED INTO ORAL CONTRACTS?

A
  1. Through notice
  2. Through a consistent course of dealing
  3. Through a common understanding of the parties
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

HOW ARE WRITTEN TERMS INCORPORATED INTO ORAL CONTRACTS THROUGH ‘NOTICE’?

A
  1. Giving the party actual notice of these terms - the term must be brought to the claimant’s attention at the time of making the contract.
  2. If a notice is clearly and obviously displayed, the fact that a specific person cannot read it will not prevent the notice from being incorporated as a valid term
  3. If the claimant did not actually know about the term before or at the time of making the contract, it could still be considered a term of the contract if reasonable notice can be shown to have been given
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

WHAT ARE THE FACTORS THAT THE COURTS WILL CONSIDER WHEN DECIDING WHETHER REASONABLE NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN IN RESPECT OF WRITTEN TERMS BEING INCORPORATED INTO ORAL CONTRACTS?

A
  1. The timing of the document
  2. The type of document in which the clause is contained
  3. The type of clause
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

HOW ARE WRITTEN TERMS INCORPORATED INTO ORAL CONTRACTS THROUGH ‘CONSISTENT COURSE OF DEALING’?

A

A term may be incorporated into a contract because the parties have previously dealt with each other on those terms.

If A and B have made the same contract on the same terms serval times before, the court may find that the parties have established a sufficiently consistent course of dealing for the term(s) to be incorporated into their next agreement, even if they do not receive actual or reasonable notice of the terms on this particular occasion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

HOW ARE WRITTEN TERMS INCORPORATED INTO ORAL CONTRACTS THROUGH ‘COMMON UNDERSTANDING’?

A

Even in situations where there is lack of notice and no consistent course of dealing can be found, written terms can still be incorporated into an oral contract where to do so, would reflect the common understanding of the parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

WHAT ARE THE THREE WAYS IN WHICH TERMS ARE IMPLIED?

A
  1. By statute
  2. By custom
  3. By the courts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

WHAT ARE THE PIECES OF LEGISLATION RELEVANT TO IMPLIED TERMS AND HELPING PROTECT CONSUMERS FROM BEING TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF?

A

Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015)

Sale of Goods Act 1979 (SGA 1979)

Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 (SGSA 1982)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

WHAT PIECE OF LEGISLATION GOVERNS BUSINESS-TO-CONSUMER CONTRACTS?

A

CRA 2015 applies to all contracts made on or after 01 October 2015 between a trader and a consumer and governs business-consumer contracts

24
Q

WHAT IS A ‘TRADER’ IN RESPECT OF BUSINESS-TO-CONSUMER CONTRACTS?

A

A person acting for purposes relating to that person’s trade, business, craft or profession, whether acting personally or through another person acting in the trader’s name or on the traders behalf (s2(2) CRA 2015)

25
Q

WHAT IS A ‘CONSUMER’ IN RESPECT OF BUSINESS-TO-CONSUMER CONTRACTS?

A

An individual acting for purposes that are wholly or mainly outside that individual’s trade, business, craft or profession (s2(3) CRA 2015)

26
Q

WHAT PIECE OF LEGISLATION GOVERNS GOODS CONTRACTS?

A

Chapter 2 CRA 2015 covers goods contracts, with ‘goods’ identified as any tangible moveable items (s2(8) CRA 2015)

27
Q

WHAT ARE THE THREE TERMS IMPLIED INTO BUSINESS-TO-CONSUMER GOODS CONTRACTS BY CRA 2015?

A
  • Of satisfactory quality
  • Fit for their particular purpose
  • As described
28
Q

WHAT DOES S9 CRA 2015 STATE IN RESPECT OF ‘SATISFACTORY QUALITY’ IN TERMS OF BUSINESS-TO-CONSUMER GOODS CONTRACTS?

A

Every contract to supply goods will include a term that the goods sold are of a satisfactory quality

This means that the goods must meet the standard that a reasonable person would regard as satisfactory, taking account of any description of the goods, the price or other consideration for the goods (if relevant) and all other relevant circumstances (s9(2) CRA 2015).

29
Q

WHAT DOES S9(3) CRA 2015 STATE IN RESPECT OF ‘SATISFACTORY QUALITY’ IN TERMS OF BUSINESS-TO-CONSUMER GOODS CONTRACTS?

A

The quality of goods included their state of condition; and the following aspects (among others) are appropriate on cases aspects of the quality of goods:

a) Fitness for all purposes for which goods of that kind are commonly supplied
b) Appearance and finish
c) Freedom from minor defects
d) Safety
e) Durability

30
Q

WHAT DOES S9(4) CRA 2015 STATE IN RESPECT OF ‘SATISFACTORY QUALITY’ IN TERMS OF BUSINESS-TO-CONSUMER GOODS CONTRACTS?

A

The promise as to satisfactory quality does not, however, apply to defects that were specifically brought to the buyer’s attention before the goods were bought nor, when the buyer examines the goods or a sample of the goods before making the contract, to fault which should have been revealed by that examination

31
Q

WHAT DOES S10 CRA 2015 STATE IN RESPECT OF ‘FITNESS FOR PURPOSE’ IN TERMS OF BUSINESS-TO-CONSUMER GOODS CONTRACTS?

A

There is an implied term that, where the consumer makes known to the trader of any particular purpose for which the goods are required, the goods will be fit for that purpose, whether or not it is a purpose for which goods of that kind are commonly supplied.

This term only applies if the consumer relies on the trader’s skill and judgement. A consumer who makes their own choice of product and finds it unfit for their purpose, will not have a case under this section.

32
Q

WHAT DOES S11 CRA 2015 STATE IN RESPECT OF ‘DESCRIPTION’ IN TERMS OF BUSINESS-TO-CONSUMER GOODS CONTRACTS?

A

When goods are sold by description, there is an implied term that will match the description

33
Q

WHAT DOES S11(2) CRA 2015 STATE IN RESPECT OF ‘DESCRIPTION’ IN TERMS OF BUSINESS-TO-CONSUMER GOODS CONTRACTS?

A

Where goods are supplied by sample and description, the goods eventually supplied must match both in terms of its quality

34
Q

WHAT DOES S11(3) CRA 2015 STATE IN RESPECT OF ‘DESCRIPTION’ IN TERMS OF BUSINESS-TO-CONSUMER GOODS CONTRACTS?

A

Supply of goods is not prevented from being a supply by description just because the goods are exposed for supply and selected by the buyers.

This means that s11 CRA 2015 does not just offer protection in relation to goods that we buy without physically seeing them first, but the law here also covers goods that we can physically inspect, but where we still rely on the seller’s description

35
Q

WHEN DOES S11 CRA 2015 APPLY IN RESPECT OF ‘DESCRIPTION’ IN TERMS OF BUSINESS-TO-CONSUMER GOODS CONTRACTS?

A

The consumer must also rely on the trader’s description, which means that where – for example – the consumer is more knowledgeable about the subject matter than the trader, or where the consumer simply dismisses the description as inaccurate, there will be no breach of s11 CRA 2015

36
Q

WHAT ARE THE FOUR TERMS IMPLIED INTO BUSINESS-TO-CONSUMER SERVICES CONTRACTS BY CRA 2015?

A
  1. S49 - that the trader will perform the service with reasonable care and skill
  2. S50 - anything said or written to the consumer, by or on behalf of the trader, will be implied as a term of the contract if the information was considered by the consumer when:a. Deciding whether to enter into the contract
    b. Making any decision about the service after
    having entered into the contract
  3. S51- that the consumer must pay a reasonable price for the service, and no more. This term only applies where the consumer has not already agreed a price, or some other consideration
  4. S52 - the trader must perform the service within a reasonable time. This provision only applies where the time for performance has not been expressly fixed within the contract
37
Q

WHICH CONTRACTS UNDER WHICH A TRADER SUPPLIES DIGITAL CONTENT TO A CONSUMER ARE COVERED BY CRA 2015?

A
  • For a price (s33(1) CRA 2015)
  • Free with goods, services or other digital content which has been paid for, and which would not otherwise be generally available to consumers (s33(2) CRA 2015)
38
Q

WHAT LEGISLATION GOVERNS BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS CONTRACTS?

A

The ‘old’ law:

Sales of Goods Act 1979 (SGA 1979)
Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 (SGSA 1982)

39
Q

IN RESPECT OF BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS CONTRACTS, WHEN DOES THE SALES OF GOODS ACT 1979 APPLY?

A

Only applies to a contract for the sale of goods.

This is defined under s2(1) SGA 1979 as a contract by which the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a money consideration, called the price

40
Q

IN RESPECT OF BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS CONTRACTS, WHAT IMPLIED TERMS ARE RELEVANT UNDER THE SALES OF GOODS ACT 1979?

A
  1. Satisfactory quality - S14(2) SGA 1979
  2. Fitness for purpose - S14(3) SGA 1979
  3. Description - S13 SGA 1979
41
Q

IN RESPECT OF BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS CONTRACTS, WHEN DOES THE SUPPLY OF GOODS AND SERVICES ACT 1982 APPLY?

A

SGSA 1982 covers a range of contractual situations, including contracts for the transfer of property in goods

A contract for the transfer of property in goods is defined in s1 SGSA 1982as a contract under which one person transfers or agrees to transfer to another property in goods, other than an excepted contract, and an excepted contract includes a sale of goods contract.

42
Q

IN RESPECT OF BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS CONTRACTS, WHAT IMPLIED TERMS ARE RELEVANT UNDER THE SUPPLY OF GOODS AND SERVICES ACT 1982 IN RESPECT OF CONTRACTS FOR THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY IN GOODS?

A
  1. Satisfactory quality - S4 SGSA 1982
  2. Fitness for purpose - no corresponding term in
    SGSA 1982
  3. Description - S3 SGSA 1982
43
Q

IN RESPECT OF BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS CONTRACTS, WHAT IMPLIED TERMS ARE RELEVANT UNDER THE SUPPLY OF GOODS AND SERVICES ACT 1982 IN RESPECT OF CONTRACTS FOR THE SUPPLY OF SERVICES?

A
  1. Satisfactory quality - S13 SGSA 1982
  2. Fitness for purpose - S15 SGSA 1982
  3. Description - S14 SGSA 1982
44
Q

HOW CAN TERMS BE IMPLIED BY ‘CUSTOM’?

A

Terms can also be implied into a contract as a result of local or trade usage, commonly known as custom

45
Q

WHAT CRITERIA IS EXAMINED WHEN CONSIDERING WHETHER TERMS ARE TO BE IMPLIED BY ‘CUSTOM’?

A
  • Whether the term has been in use for a sufficient length of time
  • Whether it is reasonable to imply such a term
  • Whether the term is inconsistent with an express term
  • That such a term is used in practice
  • That the implication of such a term is acceptable to the court

Terms implied by custom are unusual today.

46
Q

HOW CAN TERMS BE IMPLIED BY THE COURTS?

A

Under the common law, the courts may read terms into a contract in two ways:

  1. They may read terms into a contract because case law, often as a matter of policy, has established that these terms always appear in these types of contract. These are sometimes referred to as terms implied by law
  2. They may read terms into a contract by reference to the intentions of the parties. These are sometimes called implied on the particular facts
47
Q

WHAT ARE THE TWO TESTS RELEVANT TO TERMS BEING IMPLIED BY THE COURTS?

A

A term should only be implied on the particular facts if it satisfied either the business efficacy test or the officious bystander rule

48
Q

WHAT IS THE ‘BUSINESS EFFICACY TEST’?

A

The business efficacy test requires that a term is needed to give the contract business efficacy; that is, the contract would be unworkable without it.

The strict nature of this test was explained in Liverpool City Council v Irwin [1976]

49
Q

WHAT IS THE OFFICIOUS BYSTANDER RULE?

A

This comes from Shirlaw v Southern Foundries Ltd [1939] where it was states:

‘if, while the parties making their bargain an officious bystander were to suggest some express provision for it in the agreement, they would testily suppress him with a common ‘Oh of course!’’

50
Q

WHAT NEEDS TO BE CONSIDERED WHEN CONSIDERING THE IMPORTANCE OF A CONTRACTUAL TERM?

A

Conditions and warranties need to be differentiated

51
Q

WHAT IS A CONDITION?

A

The more important contract terms are called conditions.

A condition is a term that goes to the very root of the contract, and it is of central importance.

Breach of a condition will allow the innocent party to treat the contract as at its end. The innocent party can also, or alternatively, sue for damages.

52
Q

WHAT IS A WARRANTY?

A

A warranty is a term of the contract which is less important. If a warranty is broken, the injured party must carry on with the contract but they can sue for damages.

53
Q

WHEN WILL A COURT BE BOUND BY PARTIES’ EXPRESS INTENTION?

A

When they have stated expressly in the contract which terms they consider to be of fundamental importance

54
Q

WHAT ARE INTERMEDIATE OR INNOMINATE TERMS?

A

Terms which do not clearly fit into one category

55
Q

HOW WILL THE COURT DECIDE THE STATUS OF INTERMEDIATE OR INNOMINATE TERMS?

A

The court will consider whether the breach of the term which has occurred ‘goes to the root of the contract’.

For innominate terms, the courts adopt a ‘wait and see’ approach and determine the effect of the breach after the term has been broken by looking at the severity of the consequences of the breach

The modern position is that, unless the parties expressly categorise terms themselves or the intention of the parties is made clear in some other way, the starting point will be that a term will be classified as innominate (Spar Shipping AS v Grand China Logistics [2015])

CONTRACT LAW (7 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions