Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Psychology Stage 2 > Social Psychology > Flashcards

Social Psychology Flashcards

1
Q

Social-cognitive approach to personality

A

people behave differently due to individual differences in self-schema
self-schemas provide a framework for organising and storing information about our personality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

self-schema

A

cognitive representations of oneself that one uses to organise and process self-relevant information
consists of the important behaviours and attributes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

self-reference effect

A

remember things much better if they’re related to you, as they are processed through self-schemas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

self-awareness

A

understanding we are separate entity from others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

self-recognition test

A

mark placed on forehead and then person/ animal is placed in front of a mirror, self-awareness is assumed if they touch the mark on their forehead

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

self-concept

A

personal summary of who we are

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

self-perception theory

A

our own behaviour as a basis for inference, intrinsic versus extrinsic rewards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

external/ extrinsic motivations

A

behaviour driven by rewards, rewards don’t have to be related to the behaviour
externally motivated behaviours not reflective of the self
may reduce motivation to repeat the behaviours in the future if they were externally motivated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

internal/ intrinsic motivations

A

behaviour driven by self-interest
no explicit reward for behaviour
behaviour is rewarding in itself
internally motivated behaviours more reflective of the self, associated with increased motivations to repeat behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

self-fulfilling prophecy

A

idea that if someone has an expectation if you, you will most likely follow through with that expectation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

social comparison theory (as a source of the self)

A

use others to evaluate our own abilities and characteristics
think of ourselves in terms of what makes us unique
upward (people better off than us) versus downward (people worse off than us) comparisons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

upward social comparison

A

when we compare ourselves to someone who is better than us, often to improve ourselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

downward social comparison

A

when we compare ourselves to someone who is worse than us, often to make ourselves feel better

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Study on student alcohol abuse

A

Shows that context and environment can influence the self
Amount consumed after graduation goes down
often reduce quantity consumed but not always frequency
suggests a drinking identity whilst at uni may be important part of the self-concept which then reduces after graduation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Lindgren et al. (2022)

A

Drinking identity, consumption and social networks reduce after graduation
reductions in drinking come before changes in identity
context may promote drinking, which changes personality
suggests that this personality change is stable until context is removed, then it reverts
so suggests context is very important for the self

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Independent (western) cultures self-concept

A

coherence through seeing self as independent, separate from others, expressed in inner thoughts and feelings
describe self with general attributes: smart, shy, outgoing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

interdependent (eastern) cultures self-concept

A

coherence through web of social connections with others
describe self using roles and/ or relationships: daughter, religion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

three simultaneous selves

A

ideal self
ought self
actual self

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

actual self

A

the person we think we are right now, including the good and bad qualities, group membership, and other self-concept components

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

ideal self

A

the person we hope to become, the best version of our potential, with positive or enhanced qualities and realised dreams

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

ought self

A

what other people want us to be, includes cultural, parental and romantic partner expectations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

self-presentation theory

A

we adapt to fit into the situation
we present ourselves to make an impression
impression management and self-monitoring (which can be exhausting)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

self-control

A

ability to override thoughts, emotions and behaviours (requires effort)
implement behaviours which are appropriate for the situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

self-expression

A

actions consistent with self-concept (actual self)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

self-presentation

A

actions shape others impressions of us in positive ways (ought or ideal self) - we may inhibit certain behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

low self-monitoring

A

act as they truly see themselves
consistent with self-schema

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

high self-monitoring

A

act as the situation calls for
impression formation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

regulatory focus theory

A

promotion focus: engage self-control to promote ideal self, often intrinsically motivated - to better yourself
prevention focus: engage self-control to promote ought self, used to fulfil one’s obligations, often extrinsically motivated (avoiding punishment) - focus on who we should be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

self-discrepancy theory

A

when our different selves do not align can lead to mental health problems and poor self-esteem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

self-esteem

A

how good you feel about yourself
indicates how you are doing in terms of successes and social acceptance versus failures and social rejection
confidence in one’s abilities
self-worth or respect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

what does it mean that we are risk-averse?

A

we usually chose situations where we can succeed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

internal locus of control

A

people can affect what happens to them
good and bad experiences are people’s own making
better coping, less anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

external locus of control

A

people who believe that what happens to them is outside of their control
higher rates of psychological disorders
poorer self-esteem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

cultural differences in self-esteem

A

self-enhancement is absent in some Asian and interdependent cultures compared to the West, found in Heine & Lehman (2003)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

how does witnessing a good or bad performance by someone else affect us?

A

if performance is good = we feel bad
if performance is bad = we feel good

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Brewer and Weber (1994)

A

participants assigned to majority or minority group
randomly assigned
if participants were in the majority and witnessed: another majority do good = they feel bad, majority does bad = they feel good, minority performance does not affect majority
if participants were in the minority: if minority is good = they feel good, if majority performance is bad = they feel bad
pattern reversed in majority and minority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

sources of the self

A

personal thoughts and emotions - rewarding, anxiety inducing
other people’s reactions - similar to self fulfilling prophecy, others expectations shapes your behaviour
social comparison theory - upward or downward comparison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

minimal group paradigm

A

experimental method to study group conflict
to be considered a minimal group paradigm:
there must be no face-to-face contact
participants must not know which groups other people belong to
group allocation must be fairly meaningless
responses could not be justified by strategic motives (arbitrary)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Robber’s Cave experiment (Sherif et al. 1954)

A

Participants were 22 boys with a medium age of 12
they were divided into two groups in a scout camp
findings show that hostility can occur between groups with the introduction of competition
when the competition was removed the conflict didn’t stop until they had to work together for a goal that benefitted everyone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Realistic group conflict theory

A

fighting over resources
evolutionary and economic account as to why group conflict occurs
groups usually compete when resources are contested
for example Israel and Palestine over land
supported by Robber’s Cave and other experiments
group competition leads to ethnocentrism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

ethnocentrism

A

where the outgroup is vilified and the ingroup is glorified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Who came up with social identity theory

A

Tajfel, 1971

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Social identity theory to explain intergroup conflict

A

alternative explanation of group conflict
we derive self-esteem from our valued group memberships
we feel comforted and validated by shared experiences and opinions
key part of building self-esteem from group membership is believing outgroups are inferior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

in-group

A

those who belong to our social group
viewed as similar to ourselves
view members as unique and novel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

out-group

A

those who belong to other social group
viewed as dissimilar to ourselves
view members as similar/homogenous (stereotypes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

self-categorisation

A

seeing oneself as a member of a social group rather than a unique individual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

social identity

A

the way we feel about our group memberships
even if we identify with a group, it may not be a strong influence on our behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

sources of group membership

A

events remind people of group memberships
direct reminders from others
presence of in-group members
presence of out-group members
intergroup conflict (being treated differently reminds you)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

how does group membership influence self-esteem?

A

when our group wins we feel great
refer to group as ‘we’ more after a win
we tend to rely on groups successes to hide our failures
group membership can protect self-esteem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

Cialdini and Borden (1976)

A

Basking in Reflected Glory study
football teams
students football teams they were more likely to refer to the winning team as ‘we’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

in-group favouritism

A

perceptions of other in-group members become favourable
positivity towards in-group based on group membership not based on unique personal characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

in-group favouritism

A

perceptions of other in-group members become favourable
positivity towards in-group based on group membership not based on unique personal characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

out-group homogeneity effect

A

seeing out-group as less diverse than in-group
fewer out-group members known
out-groups treated more negatively
focus on group membership, no attempt to learn individual characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

Billig and Tajfel (1973)

A

Schoolboys divided into group X and W
allowed to divide points between their group and the other group members
they gave more points to their group and wanted out-group to be disadvantaged even if it cost them points
preferred taking 11 points for their group and 7 points for outgroup, rather than 17 points for each group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

Lemyre and Smith (1985) findings

A

people feel better about themselves after discriminating against out-groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

stigma

A

devalued social identity
typically associated with minority status
being part of a stigmatised group can cost the persons performance and self-esteem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

stereotype threat

A

impairment due to knowledge that others devalue ones group
performance not impaired if group membership is not highlighted or external excuse for failure is present

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

Spencer et al. (1999)

A

stereotype threat
men and women, maths test
told there was gender differences vs. told there’s not
if the women highly identified with their gender they felt stereotype threat and performed worse in the maths test when told there was gender differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

what are social norms?

A

accepted ways to think. feel act
often informed by group membership
observe group members attitudes or behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
59
Q

Asch (1951)

A

line judgement task
confederates gave wrong answer and participants frequently went along
only 25% never conformed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
60
Q

private conformity

A

personally convinced that group is correct; conform even when group is not present

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
61
Q

public conformity

A

behave consistently with norms that are not privately accepted as correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
62
Q

culture differences in conformity

A

conformity found in both Western and non-Western cultures
effects are stronger in interdependent Asian cultures (they emphasise group membership more)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
63
Q

false consensus effect

A

overestimating the extent to which others agree with our attitudes, preferences and behavioural choices
(presume people agree with us)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
64
Q

group polarisation (dangers of conformity)

A

idea that when we follow the group too much can lead to very polarising beliefs (very different from others)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
65
Q

groupthink (dangers of conformity)

A

not thinking individually, just going with the group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
66
Q

pluralistic ignorance (dangers of conformity)

A

assumption that a certain issue is not a problem anymore so it is just ignored

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
67
Q

foot-in-the-door (promoting conformity)

A

start with small request then gradually increase what you’re asking for

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
68
Q

door-in-the-face (promoting conformity)

A

start with unrealistic offer then decrease it to what you actually wanted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
69
Q

rule of reciprocity (promoting conformity)

A

do something for someone and they may do something for you

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
70
Q

low-ball technique (promoting conformity)

A

just lying to get what you want, hide the real costs of something

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
71
Q

salience of group (promoting conformity) in Stanford Prison experiment

A

they felt like they belonged to the prisoner or guard group, he gave them uniforms etc. to make the group salient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
72
Q

example of how authority figures can promote conformity

A

obedience study by Milgrim shows authority figure increased conformity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
73
Q

What is an attitude?

A

a cognitive representation that summarises evaluation of an attitude object (e.g. belief)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
74
Q

attitude objects

A

can be the self, other people, things, actions, events or ideas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
75
Q

ways to measure attitudes

A

self-report on attitude scales
observation of behaviour
physiological measures (e.g. EEG, heartrate, skin conductance)
reaction time measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
76
Q

Implicit Association test (IAT)

A

common assessment of racial bias
captures associations in memory
assumption that these are automatic
measures strength of associations between concepts

77
Q

implicit measure

A

yield different results from self-report as social desirability influences self-report, people lie to make themselves look better and won’t admit things
assumed to be more accurate as thought to be an automatic, gut reaction

78
Q

what does a fast response indicate in an IAT?

A

that two concepts are associated so it is easy to respond quickly and correctly when categorising
e.g. flower-pleasant

79
Q

what does a slower response indicate in an IAT?

A

that two concepts are not associated so it is difficult to respond quickly and correctly when categorising
e.g. flower-unpleasant
which leads to slower responses to these pairings

80
Q

utilitarian function

A

reduces cognitive effort needed to make decisions

81
Q

function of attitudes

A

help people to master the environment because we evaluate everything almost instantly
provide shortcuts to guide behaviour

82
Q

information needed for attitude formation

A

ABCs:
affective information (emotions)
behavioural information (interactions with that object)
cognitive information (facts and beliefs, thoughts)

83
Q

persuasion (changing attitudes)

A

process of forming, strengthening or changing attitudes

84
Q

rational messages to change attitudes

A

provide cognitive information about an attitude object

85
Q

emotional appeals to change attitudes

A

associate affective information with the attitude object

86
Q

cognitive dissonance

A

uncomfortable state produced by awareness of inconsistencies between attitudes and behaviour
produces motivation to process to resolve the inconsistencies
sometimes result in change in attitude

87
Q

how can priming be used to change attitudes?

A

can activate information to change behaviour
conscious or unconscious
may retrieve relevant social norms to promote conformity

88
Q

Petzel and Noel (2020) priming study

A

showed more avoidance to alcohol when primed with driving safety

89
Q

APE model

A

Associative-propositional evaluation (APE) model
idea that learning occurs through:
associative learning
propositional learning

90
Q

associative learning (APE model)

A

mental links form between concepts
common properties provide basis for mental link
shorter pathway between concepts = stronger association in memory
when two stimuli are frequently paired together it creates a semantic link in memory
spontaneous emotional response
can be rejected if you have the energy

91
Q

associative learning - spreading activation

A

concept is activated in semantic network, spread in any number of directions, activating other nearby associations in network
nearby activated concepts inform behaviour

92
Q

propositional learning (APE model)

A

mental links are elaborated upon, requires conscious effort
creation of causal relations between associations
attempt to validate associations in memory
more deliberate judgements (require effort)
further strengthened if validated

93
Q

changing attitudes via APE model:

A

target propositional beliefs
create inconsistency between ‘gut reaction’ and beliefs
requires conscious effort to invalidate current associations - which people don’t always have or may not want to do
target associative learned information
avoid activation of negative associations
are hardwired into memory so can be difficult to change

94
Q

use of emotions to change associations

A

perspective-taking - imagining yourself as a member of a stigmatised group

95
Q

evaluative conditioning

A

aims to replace or create new links between concepts in memory through associative processes (co-activation of emotional stimuli and target stimuli)

96
Q

stereotypes

A

impressions of groups that people form by associating the groups with particular characteristics

97
Q

prejudice

A

positive or negative evaluations of a social group or its members

98
Q

discrimination

A

positive or negative behaviour directed toward a social group or its members

99
Q

social identity theory (group membership)

A

identify with groups that are important to us
help set ourselves apart from others
positively favour in-group over out-group

100
Q

categorisation-competition hypothesis

A

viewing people in terms of ingroups ad outgroups is sufficient to generate intergroup competition
people place themselves and others into distinct categories
outgroup homogeneity bias develops
categorisation results in taking an ‘us’ vs. ‘them’ approach
arouses feelings of competition and a desire to win

101
Q

self-esteem hypothesis

A

feeling good when your group does well
low self-esteem promotes intergroup bias to raise self-esteem

102
Q

identification with group increases when…

A

there are threats to group
when independent ideologies align with groups

103
Q

realistic conflict theory

A

dislike outgroups because they are seen as competing with ingroup for resources
intergroup bias used by majority to reduce competition
gains in minority seen as loss for majority
threat increases if groups are seen as equal
Robbers cave experiment (Sherif, 1954)

104
Q

stable oppression

A

subordinated group accepts groups superiority to avoid conflict
members of subordinate group may take on majority groups values and norms and reject their own

105
Q

unstable oppression

A

when minority rejects majority groups superior status
outwardly views dominant group as oppressive
develops hostility towards majority group and challenges dominance

106
Q

if challenge from a minority group is seen as unjustified…

A

seen as threatening and inferior
respond with hostility and increased bias
justifies the actions as seen as necessary to maintain status quo (moral exclusion)

107
Q

if challenge from minority is seen as justified…

A

views claims as legitimate
gives minority power to demand change
treat minority with tolerance (often surface level/ superficial)

108
Q

intergroup threat theory

A

prejudice derives from two types of perceived threat:
symbolic threat
realistic threat

109
Q

symbolic threats

A

threats to reduce status, beliefs or ideologies of group
loss of perceived power/ importance

110
Q

realistic threats

A

threats to reduce power or resources of group
physical or material harm to group members

111
Q

factors that promote threat

A

group size
group power
history

112
Q

which group is more likely to respond to threat

A

high power groups respond more strongly to threat because they:
have more to lose
have resources to deal with it
motivation to maintain status quo

113
Q

how can history promote threat?

A

if there is a history of conflict between groups there is higher perceptions of threat
salience of intergroup conflict
knowledge of cultural differences may promote conflict, can create expectation of conflict

114
Q

blatant discrimination

A

unequal and harmful treatment that is intentional and visible

115
Q

subtle discrimination

A

unequal and harmful treatment that is typically less visible and obvious
often not noticed because people have internalised it as normal
can be active or passive
examples: hostile humour and abnormalisation

116
Q

Mallett et al. (2016)

A

found that if sexism is said in the form of a joke people are less likely to confront it and just ignore it
(this type of thing leads to the acceptance of it long term)

117
Q

microaggressions

A

small scale, everyday behaviours that demean other social groups or members of those groups

118
Q

Theory of planned behaviour (Ajzen, 1991)

A

revised version of theory of reasoned action (assumed that humans were rational and unaffected by external factors)
this theory is that behaviour is complex and rarely rational
includes new factor: perceived control
prejudiced attitudes can influence behaviour
interact with social norms and expectations to behave morally
availability of self-control to inhibit actions

119
Q

perceived control (theory of planned behaviour)

A

our ability to inhibit behaviour
can be affected by fatigue or time constraints
‘internal brake’

120
Q

Weapons identification task

A

Payne, 2001
sort guns vs. tools
primed with black vs. white faces
incongruent pairings harder to categorise

121
Q

basic social categories

A

information which is easily observable for categorisation:
gender
age
race
we use this information to draw conclusions about a person’s traits, social roles and physical characteristics

122
Q

intersectionality

A

when people belong to more than one basic category at once

123
Q

bottom-up

A

based on the observable characteristics of an individual

124
Q

top-down processing

A

based on prior knowledge people have stored in memory and their expectations about interactions

125
Q

stereotypes

A

impressions of groups that people form by associating the groups with particular characteristics

126
Q

prejudiced attitudes

A

prejudiced individuals pay more attention to characteristics consistent with their attitudes and stereotypic beliefs
e.g. racist attitudes = focus on race when categorising

127
Q

social role theory (sources of stereotypes)

A

people observe the social roles others occupy
then associate characteristics of role with those occupy it

128
Q

correspondence bias

A

we tend to assume behaviours of others are due to personality, no external or situational factors
leads to development of stereotypic beliefs

129
Q

illusory correlation

A

people incorrectly link two characteristics
overestimate the relationship between two categories when undesirable information stands out
inaccurate associations become firmly held

130
Q

Johar et al. (2003) influence of advertising

A

adverts depicting women and men in traditional roles then they were asked to imagine their lives 10 years in the future, they found women who saw the traditional adverts described their future as ‘homemaker’ rather than ‘career woman’
men not influenced

131
Q

difference in corpus collosum size

A

individuals with smaller sized brains have larger corpus callosum compared to individuals with larger brains, regardless of sex

132
Q

role of socialisation

A

brain development affected by social interactions and culture
important figures in childrens lives enforce gender stereotypes by offering their approval or disapproval of toy preference
gendered play behaviours support the development of gender stereotyped skills and traits

133
Q

ultimate attribution error (negative behaviour)

A

when ingroup behaviour is negative it is due to situational/ uncontrollable factors but if outgroup does something negative it must be due to personality

134
Q

ultimate attribution error (positive behaviour)

A

when ingroup behaviour is positive it is due to personality but when outgroup is positive must be due to luck, advantages or unusual situational factors

135
Q

dehumanisation

A

outgroups are not believed to share basic human physical features that characterise the ingroup

136
Q

fusiform face area (FFA)

A

temporal lobe
processing facial information
more activity in FFA when looking at in-group (Van Bavel et al. 2011)

137
Q

how is self-esteem affected by stereotypes?

A

members of stigmatised group struggle to construct positive, coherent sense of self

138
Q

stereotype knowledge

A

extent to which someone is familiar with the content of a stereotype

139
Q

stereotype endorsement

A

extent to which someone personally believes the societal stereotype accurately describes a social group

140
Q

stereotype activation

A

extent to which a stereotype is accessible in one’s mind

141
Q

stereotype application

A

extent to which one uses a stereotype to judge a member of the stereotyped group

142
Q

prototypicality

A

extent to which a social group member has the physical features associated with their social group
the more prototypical someone looks the faster someone will categorise them

143
Q

Cunningham et al.

A

amygdala activation is higher when we see a very fast flash of a black face compared to a white face but when given more time to look at the black face the amygdala activation goes down

144
Q

cognitive busyness

A

when we are trying to do another task whilst already busy with one
lack of space in working memory disrupts stereotype activation
BUT if stereotypes are already activated then cognitive busyness facilitates stereotype application

145
Q

Gilbert and Hixon (1991)

A

found that you are less likely to use stereotypes if you’re busy doing something else
if engages, stereotypes less likely to be activated

146
Q

promoting stereotype application (myopia)

A

behaviour based on immediate, readily available information
long-term consequences not considered
can be triggered by fatigue/ stress

147
Q

social neuroscience

A

using the brain to measure social behavioural processes
to understand the underlying processes of social behaviours

148
Q

Sellaro et al. (2015)

A

found that when they stimulated a part of the frontal lobe with transcranial magnetic stimulation IAT scores went down (decreased implicit bias towards out-group)

149
Q

3 diversity perspectives

A

colourblind perspective
assimilationist
multicultural

150
Q

colour blind perspective

A

people should ignore group membership
should focus on commonalities
believe doing so promotes equality and less discrimination

151
Q

colour evasion

A

belief that one should avoid recognising, discussing, or otherwise engaging with issues related to race or ethnicity

152
Q

equality orientation

A

belief that one should view outgroup members as individuals and focus on intergroup similarities rather than differences

153
Q

assimilationist

A

minority groups should give up their own cultures and replace them with majority culture
belief that if everyone is the same prejudice will disappear

154
Q

multicultural perspective

A

holds that race and ethnicity should be given attention rather than ignored
belief that prejudice develops from a lack of knowledge and respect for others

155
Q

Farrell et al. 2020

A

voluntary initiatives are better, even though less people may attend there is less backlash and they’re more effective

156
Q

ERN meaning

A

Error-related negativity
negative deflection on ERP which can show monitoring for errors and engagement of self control
reductions in stereotype application

157
Q

Amodio and Devine study

A

found that people with high internal motivation show high ERN after making a stereotypical error on a weapon identification task

158
Q

stereotype rebound

A

unwanted thoughts return in greater strength after suppressing them
can occur when resources are depleted because inhibiting these thoughts takes effort

159
Q

intergroup contact theory

A

contact hypothesis
under the proper conditions, interaction between group members leads to positive change

160
Q

conditions for success in intergroup contact theory

A

equal status between groups
cooperation in achieving common goals
acquaintance potential
institutional support

161
Q

positive-negative contact asymmetry

A

the effects of negative contact may be more powerful than the effects of positive contact

162
Q

3 forms of indirect contact

A

extended contact - having a friend who has a relationship with someone in an out-group
media contact - seeing positive intergroup contact in the media
imagined contact - being guided or using a script to imagine a pleasant interaction with someone from the out-group

163
Q

Prosocial behaviour

A

Behavior with the intention is to help or benefit others
Other goals may be present as well
Can be internally or externally motivated

164
Q

Evolutionary reasons for prosocial behaviour

A

Genetics - Helping is adaptive when it perpetuates the helper’s gene pool
Kin selection - Traits that facilitate survival of an individual’s genetic relatives

165
Q

Fitzgerald and Colarelli (2009)

A

Found that people are more likely to help someone in their in-group than their out-group

166
Q

Altruism

A

Prosocial behavior motivated by desire to help others for its
own sake, not for personal rewards
Internally motivated

167
Q

Egoism

A

Prosocial behavior motivated partly by rewards
Externally motivated
Mood based - Can help us feel good
Material based - People may give us things if we help them
Status based - We may receive recognition/ respect

168
Q

Reciprocity

A

Engage in “give and take” with others such that when we do
someone a favor, we expect the favor to eventually be repaid

169
Q

Norm of reciprocity

A

We should both offer help & avoid harming those who have helped us

170
Q

bystander effect

A

the finding that the presence of more bystanders consistently decreases the likelihood of any one person giving help

171
Q

Darley & Latané, 1968

A

participants heard another participant having a “seizure” in what they believed was a group of two, three, or six people
The more people participants believed to be present, the less likely the real participants were to help

172
Q

diffusion of responsibility

A

the effect of other people present on diminishing each individual’s perceived responsibility for helping

173
Q

Kitty Genovese attack

A

Kitty Genovese was attacked by Winston Moseley as she returned to her apartment from her night job. Bleeding from multiple stab wounds, Genovese staggered to a street corner, where she cried out for help. As lights in the surrounding apartments went on, her assailant returned and stabbed her again, this time fatally. Reports at the time claimed that at least 38 people heard her cries for help or saw part of the attack without responding even by phoning the police, and portrayed their inaction as reflecting a shocking level of apathy.

174
Q

Pluralistic Ignorance (failure to help)

A

Assumption that others know better than us in a situation and
will engage in an appropriate response to the situation
In an emergency, may delay or stop response to help

175
Q

Norm of family privacy

A

Strangers reluctant to intervene in family matters
Even during physical attack or abuse

176
Q

Impact of gender norms in helping others

A

In emergencies, men see themselves as more capable of helping
Potential explanation for men’s greater willingness to help found in much research (Eagly & Crowley, 1986)

177
Q

Negative-state relief model of helping

A

Seeing others suffer causes negative feelings, which are relieved
by offering help
Our own negative feelings may be relieved by escape or distraction via prosocial behaviours

178
Q

Thompson et al. (1980)

A

Participants imagine friend is dying
Focus either on own feelings or on friend’s feelings
Offered opportunity to help imagined friend
25% of self-focused participants helped
83% of other-focused participants helped

179
Q

Empathy-altruism model

A

People experience 2 types of emotions when helping:
Personal distress (anxiety, upset, fear)
Empathic concern (sympathy, compassion)

Personal distress motivates egoistic helping or escape Empathic concern motivates altruistic helping

180
Q

Batson et al. (1981)

A

Students see “Elaine” very upset by receiving shocks Emotional empathy with Elaine manipulated
Ease of escape from situation manipulated
Is student willing to receive the shocks in Elaine’s place?
Empathy motivates helping even if escape would be easy

181
Q

Bereczkei et al (2007)

A

social preference scores of students who publicly announced their intention to volunteer significantly increased and the scores of those who did not volunteer decreased

182
Q

Lyle et al. (2009)

A

donors are considered as more generous than non-donors

183
Q

If CA explains cooperation then we would expect to see:

A
  1. People altering their behaviour when observed/reputation matters
  2. Cooperative people are chosen more often as a preferred partner (and less cooperative are ostracized)
  3. Cooperative people benefit from their cooperative behaviour – benefits are returned during a partnership
184
Q

Evidence that people alter their behaviour when
observed

A

Contributions increase when decisions are public and with partner choice
◦ Barclay (2004) Barclay & Willer (2007) Sylwester & Roberts (2010, 2013)

Bateson et al., 2006; Haley and Fessler, 2005
◦ Watching eyes

185
Q

Evidence that cooperative people are chosen more
often as a preferred partner

A

More cooperative players are chosen as partners
◦ Barclay, 2004; Barclay & Willer, 2007, Sylwester & Roberts, 2010, 2013

186
Q

Raihani & Smith (2015)

A

Male donors gave a larger donation when giving to an attractive female fundraiser and when responding to a large donation made by a male competitor than in any other case.

Male donors compete directly with other males in the presence of an attractive, opposite-sex audience, although no evidence for this in females

187
Q

How has natural selection shaped the psychological mechanisms underlying behaviour?

A

One way appears to be via social emotions
For example warm glow, or guilt may have evolved to increase prosocial behaviour

188
Q

Trivers (1971) suggestions about emotions and prosocial behaviour

A

suggests emotions part of a complex system regulating prosocial behaviour (specifically, reciprocal altruism) in humans

189
Q

Hooge et al. (2007)

A

Participants who underwent guilt induction procedure were significantly more cooperative in a subsequent economic game than controls

190
Q

DeSteno et al (2010)

A

Feeling gratitude towards a helpful confederate was a significant predictor of going on to behave prosocially in a subsequent economic game – irrespective of whether the recipient in the game was the helpful confederate

191
Q

Warm glow

A

Described as a ‘warming’ sensation or feeling ‘good inside’ - coined warm glow in Andreoni’s (1989) economic model ‘impure altruism’.

Psychology Stage 2 (6 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions