ABH- paper 1 Flashcards

1
Q

what section is ABH found

A

s.47 of the OAPA 1861

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

actus reus of ABH

A

either an assault or battery which causes ABH to another person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

three elements of ABH

A
  • AR of assault or battery
  • V suffers an injury counting as ABH
  • The assault/ battery must cause the injury
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

AR of assault

A

causing the V to apprehend immediate unlawful force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

AR of battery

A

applying unlawful force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

first case and definition for ABH

A

R v Miller
- any hurt or injury that interferes with the victim’s health or comfort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

leading case and definition for ABH

A

R v Chan fook
- harm that is not trivial or insignificant (trivial = minor)
- psychiatric harm can be ABH, must be diagnosed by doctor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what did Chan Fook say could not amount to ABH

A

mere emotions e.g. fear or panic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

injuries that count as ABH and cases they come from

A
  • DPP v Smith says cutting a person’s hair without consent is ABH
  • T v DPP says even a a very short loss of consciousness can be ABH
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

factual causation and case

A
  • But for test
  • R v Pagett
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

legal causation and case

A
  • operative and substantial cause test
  • significance
  • R v Smith
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what can break chain of causation and cases

A

intervening acts:
- acts of a victim, R v Williams
- acts of third party, R v Jordan
- acts of God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

when will intervening acts break chain of causation

A
  • unreasonable and unforeseeable
  • medical treatment must be palpably wrong, R v Jordan
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what can never break chain of causation and case

A
  • peculiarities of victim
  • R v Blaue, thin skull rule
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

mens rea of ABH

A

Intent or recklessness to use assault or battery which causes ABH to another person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

MR of assault

A

intent or recklessness to cause V to apprehend immediate unlawful force

17
Q

MR of battery

A

intend or recklessly apply unlawful force

18
Q

what mens rea can lead to the mens rea of ABH and case

A
  • having the MR of either the assault or battery that began the sequence of events means D has the MR for ABH.
  • R v Savage