Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Law > Occupier liability for lawful visitors > Flashcards

Occupier liability for lawful visitors Flashcards

1
Q

The act for lawful visitors

A

Occupiers Liability Act 1957

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Occupier

A

S.1 (2) of OLA 1957

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Occupier- more than one occupier of a premises

A

Wheat v E.Lacon + Co LTD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

An occupier can be in control of the premises

A

Harris v Birkenhead corporation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

No sufficient control means no occupier

A

Bailey v Armes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Exclusive occupation is not essential, may be more than one occupier

A

Collier v Anglian Water Authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Premises

A

S.1 (3)(a) OLA 1957

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Duty of care

A

S.2 (2) OLA 1957

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Does not have to be completely safe but what is reasonable

A

Laverton v Kiapasha Takeaway supreme

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Occupiers need to make land reasonably safe, not guarantee safety

A

Dean and Chapter of Rochester Cathedral v Debell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Duty cannot last forever, no constant obligation

A

Cole v Davis-Gilbert, The royal British legion and others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Liability for children

A

S.2 (3) OLA 1957

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Things can act as an allurement to young children

A

Glasgow Corporation v Taylor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Parents shouldn’t allow young children to go to potentially unsafe places

A

Phipps v Rochester Corporation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Liability to people carrying out trade/calling

A

S.2 (3) (b) OLA 1957

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Course of action and specific type of injury was not foreseeable

A

Jolley v London Borough of Sutton

17
Q

People carrying trade must be aware of particular danger of the trade

A

Roles v Nathan

18
Q

Independent contractor

A

S.2 (4) OLA 1957

19
Q

Reasonable for occupier to have given work to contractor

A

Haseldine v Daw+son ltd

20
Q

Contractor hired must be competent to do task

A

Bottomley v Todmorden Cricket club

21
Q

Occupier must check the work has been done

A

Woodward v Mayor of Hastings

Law (19 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions