Cognitive Study - Grant Flashcards

1
Q

What is the background of the study?

A

Goddon and Baddly (195) tested context dependent memory on deep sea divers - the divers had to learn a list of words either on land or underwater and recall the words either on land or underwater. Results showed recall was better when divers studied and tested in the same place

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is context dependent memory?

A

Memory is improved if the environment that the learning takes place in its the same as the environment where memory is recalled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is recall memory?

A

When you have to remember information with no prompts to remind you

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is recognition memory?

A

When you have to remember things and then recognise them in a list

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is outshining hypothesis?

A

Context dependent memory will not benefit recognition tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the aim?

A

To investigate context dependent memory effects of both recall and recognition for meaningful information (as opposed to just list of words)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the research method?

A

Lab experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the IV?

A

Sound for learning and testing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the DV?

A

Memory - recognition and recall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the experimental design?

A

Independent measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How was the sample obtained?

A

8 psychology students from Iowa State Uni acted as experiments in the study. They each recruited 5 acquaintance as participants in the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What were the characteristics of the sample?

A

39 participants (1participant’s results were not included) who ranged in age from 17 to 56 (mean age 23.4), 17 females and 23 males

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were the four conditions?

A

Silent study + silent test, noisy study + noisy test, Silent study + noisy test, noisy study + silent test,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How was recall measured?

A

10 short answer (recall tasks requiring one word or short phrase answers)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How was recognition measured?

A

16 multiple choice (recognition task of 4 answers)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was the procedure?

A

Participants were asked to read once through a two-page academic article on the subject of psychoimmunology while wearing a pair of headphones. The time taken to read was recorded and then they were given a 2 minute break. - then they completed the questions

17
Q

What was the background noise from?

A

A cafeteria

18
Q

What were the controls?

A

The questions, the article, sound, all read at once, 2 minute break, all wore headphones, standardised instruction, recall test done first, noisy condition played at moderately loud level, always tested individually

19
Q

What was the mean reading time in the silent study + silent test, condition?

A

15.0

20
Q

What was the mean reading time in the silent study + noisy test, condition?

A

11.8

21
Q

What was the mean reading time in the noisy study + silent test, condition?

A

13.8

22
Q

What was the mean reading time in the noisy study + noisy test, condition?

A

14.0

23
Q

What was the mean amount of correct answers out of 10 for the recall task for the silent study + silent test?

A

6.7

24
Q

What was the mean amount of correct answers out of 10 for the recall task for the noisy study + silent test?

A

5.4

25
Q

What was the mean amount of correct answers out of 10 for the recall task for the silent study + noisy test?

A

4.6

26
Q

What was the mean amount of correct answers out of 10 for the recall task for the noisy study + noisy test?

A

6.2

27
Q

What was the mean amount of correct answers out of 10 for the recognition task for the silent study + silent test?

A

14.3

28
Q

What was the mean amount of correct answers out of 10 for the recognition task for the noisy study + silent test?

A

12.7

29
Q

What was the mean amount of correct answers out of 10 for the recognition task for the silent study + noisy test?

A

12.7

30
Q

What was the mean amount of correct answers out of 10 for the recognition task for the noisy study + noisy test?

A

14.3

31
Q

What was the type of data which was collected?

A

Quantitative

32
Q

What were the conclusions?

A

Context dependent memory aids participants in both recall and recognition tests.
Grant suggests that it is because in this study participants were learning ‘meaningful prose’ like students really do rather than just a list of words

33
Q

What ethical guilelines were upheld?

A

Consent, withdrawal, debrief, confidentiality

34
Q

What ethical guidelines were broken?

A

Deception, and protection from harm

35
Q

Point for internal reliability

A

Lots of controls

36
Q

Point for external reliability

A

Recognition - suspicious, maybe too consistent, results look eerily patterned

37
Q

Point for internal (construct) validity

A

only looking at noise (one type of context)

38
Q

Point for external (ecological) validity

A

Students would have to read article, noise was normal for them, not tested 2 minutes after reading normally

39
Q

Is this study applicable only to the culture in which the research was carried out, or could the findings apply elsewhere?

A

Based in America, cognition should be the same everywhere.