Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Cores Studies > Social > Flashcards

Social Flashcards

1
Q

Bocchiaro - background

A

Achieve a greater understanding about the nurture of disobedience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Bocchiaro - research methods

A

Lab experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Bocchiaro - Pilot studies

A

8 pilot tests - procedure was creditable and morally acceptable to the participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Bocchiaro- sample

A

149 undergraduate students from Vu university in Amsterdam - 96 female , 53 male - mean age 20

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Bocchiaro- procedure - room 1

A

Male Dutch experimenter
Participants asked to provide few names of fellow students
Cover - sensory deprivation
3 mins to analyse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Bocchiaro- procedure - room 2

A

Asked to write an enthusiastic statement -at least 2 adjectives-exciting ,incredible,great or Superb-cannot mention the negative effects of sensory deprivation
Mailbox and research vomited form - ethical
7 mins to write statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Bocchiaro- procedure- follow up - room 1

A

2 personality tests -Hexaco , social value orientation
Given full debrief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Bocchiaro-findings

A

Obedient -76.5%
Disobedient-14.1%
Whistleblower-9.4% -open - 3.4% - anonymous - 6%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Bocchiaro- personality results

A

Results suggest a tend to whistleblowers having more faith than obedient or disobedient participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Bocchiaro- conclusion

A

Vagabond in a moral manner is challenging for people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Levine - background

A

Different countries have found that people living in urban areas tend to be less helpful than those in rural settings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Levine - aims

A

To see if the tendency of people within a city to offer non -emergent help to a stranger was stable across different situations with people in need
To see if helping of strangers varies across cultures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Levine -procedure

A

All experimenters - male , college age - trained for their role - detailed instructions on how to act and how to score participants- internal students who returned home during the holidays - dropped pen , hurt leg , helping a blind person across the street , discarded tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Levine - measure sand how participants were selected

A

Each helping measure was administered in 2 or more locations - main city centre districts
Summer months - 1 or more years between - 1992 - 1997

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Levine - results

A

Most helpful - Rio de Janeiro- 93.33%
Last helpful- Kulumpar , Malaysia - 40.33%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Levine - conclusion

A

Negative correlation , purchasing power parity and overall levels of helping
Countries with simpatica tradition on average more helpful than others

17
Q

Milgram - aim

A

To investigate what level of obedience participants would go to when asked to deliver electric shocks to someone by an authority figure

18
Q

Milgram - research methods

A

Lab experiment and observation

19
Q

Milgram - study

A

40 white males from New Haven - aged 20-50 with varying occupations
Responded to news paper ads - self selected
Paid $4.50

20
Q

Milgram - procedure

A

The teacher - participant- was seated in a room adjacent to the learner and read over the inter com a series of word - pairs
The teacher then asked the learner to identify the right answers
If the learner got wrong the teacher administered a shock
The experimenters used prods - please continue
All participants were debriefed

21
Q

Milgram - results

A

100% went to 300 volts
65% shocked up to 450 volts

22
Q

Milgram - conclusion

A

This situation produces extremely strong tendencies to obey
The situation generates extraordinary stress and emotional strain

23
Q

Pilivan - background

A

Kitty Genoese - murdered to death over a period of 30 mins in front of 30 responsive witness - allegedly

24
Q

Piliavan - key terms

A

Bystander apathy
Diffusion of responsibility

25
Q

Piliavin - aims/ research questions

A

They types of victims
The race of victims
The presence of helping models
The size of the witnessing group

26
Q

Pilivan - IVs

A

Victims conditions -
I’ll or drunk
White or black
Model conditions - early or late
Critical or adjacent

27
Q

Piliavin - DVs

A

Frequency of help
Speed of help
Race of helper
Sex of helper
Verbal comments
Movement of the area - critical or adjacent

28
Q

Piliavin -procedure

A

4 teams of students -each made up of a victim , model and 2 observers would board the train - and then approximately 70 seconds into the journey as the train would pass the first station the victim would collapse .Until he received help he would remain lying on the floor

29
Q

Piliavin - results

A

The cane victims received spontaneous help 62 of 65 trials - 5 second a and the drunk received help in 19 of the 38 trials - 109 seconds
90% of the spontaneous helpers were male
Slight race bias

30
Q

Pilivan - sample

A

4450 participants over 3 months
55% white
45% black
New York subway

Cores Studies (5 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions