13. Evidence. When is the Nac responding to DA and when is it getting there Flashcards

1
Q

how do you measure DA activity in the NAc (unsuccessful)

A
  • electroencephalography = NAc too deep to record from
  • fMRI
  • electrophysiology
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

fMRI

A

= rat NAc is small and there is limited spatial reolution in fMRI

  • need rats to be aneathestised which is issuous as need rat to be awake to study reward
  • needs to be time sensitive too as its a quick response
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

electrophysiology

A

= allows recording from populations of brain cells in deep structures

  • good spatial and temporal resolutions
  • can access both synaptic activity (input) and AP’s (output) of neurons

BUT connectivity of NAc makes it hard due to differing projections in and out
- hippocampal and DA VTA inputs make synaptic connections with the same NAc neuron (McGrinly and Grace, 2009)

  • only VTA input to NAc is dopaminergic, other projections rely on glutamate
  • how much dopamine is released by the VTW?? = microdialysis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

microdialysis

A
  • enables sampling and collecting of small-molecular-weight substances from a location at a given time
  • provides direct quantification of neurotransmitter levels in behaving animals (through chronic implementation of dialysis probe) from the interstitial space (circulating cerebrospinal fluid)
  • microdialysis probe is inserted into target area through which artificial cerebrospinal fluid is constantly perfused (semi permeable to DA and other small molecules) - purfusate
  • DA on outside of membrane defuses through semi permeable membrane into the probe along a concentration gradient
  • outflow tubing contents can be collected giving identification of the molecules present in the location recorded from (dialysate)
  • temporally poor by biochemically very accurate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Hernandez and Hoebel (1988) - cocaine

A
  • early evidence showed that local infusions of cocaine increase concentrations of DA in NAc
  • also showed that the DA metabolite (formed in metabolism - DOPAC) decreased in concentration because less DA is being metabolised (dopamine is active for longer in cleft and usually gets metabolised in presynaptic neuron)i
  • DA is not being broken down because its binding to the post synaptic terminal instead (due to increased DA in cleft)
  • DA transporters are blocked so it cant get back into presynaptic terminal so stays active for longer in synapse (more DA)
  • very simple methodology
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Ranaldi et al (1999) - method

A
  • laboratory animals learn to press levers when intravenous injections of cocaine or amph depend on it
  • within a few weeks of regular testing the behaviour becomes regulated by the systems drug level
  • loading phase
  • maintenance phase
  • two phases must mean that there is a neural consequence of drug administration (DA level)
  • rats also had a microdialysis probe implanted in their NAc, and intravenous catheters for later injections
  • DA levels of NAc were measured during MAINTENANCE, EXTINCTION and REINSTATEMENT of amph
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

loading phase

A

rat hits lever to give higher dose of drug until at a preferred level of high

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

maintenance phase

A

rat continues to press lever when preferred level of high drops to maintain at same level

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Ranaldi et al (1999) - results

A

TIME PHASE
- results highlighted a loading phase with rapid increase in dopamine levels, a clear self maintenance effect where the rat administered amph when DA dropped (not time constricted)
FREQUENCY PHASE
- results highlighted increase in frequency of leveer press when amph was decoupled from rat
- when re-coupled, the rat was given 1 shot to show that it could re-administer
- normal behaviour resumed
behavioural observations aldo made

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Ranaldi et al (1999) - behavioural observations

A

in final 30 minutes of extinction all rats had ceases stereotyped behaviour (sniffing, locomotion) and were lying down (thought to represent withdrawal)
- one shot was enough to resume stereotyped drug related behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ranaldi et al (1999) - conclusions

A
  • rate of amph administration is under the control of NAc dopamine concentrations (not timed response habit)
  • amph has little rewarding value when DA levels are already elevated (showing saturation in the reward system)
  • its the loading thats rewarding = big leap
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Yi et al, (1998)

A

1
- explored the effects of heroin self administration on DA levels in the NAc
- used different doses of heroin
- low (.06mg/kg/inj)
- medium (.1)
- high (.2)
- dose dependant increases of DA in the NAc during heroin self administration were witnessed
- frequency of self administration as a function of dose
2
- heroin co-administered with nolaxone (opioid receptor agonist)
- reduces the amount of released in the NAc (effects of opioids blocked)
- when the opioid receotirs were blocked you dont see an increase in DA in NAc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Lecca et al (2007)

A
  • master rats (self administered heroin) and yoked rats (administration done for them)
  • measuring from core and shell of NAc
  • when self administering, the rats showed higher levels of DA in SHELL compared to core
  • yoked rats showed no difference
  • after 4 weeks of injections, yoked rats show a comparable increase in DA levels within the NAc CORE
  • core = premotor control
  • shell = hedonic output
  • master rat is moving towards rewarding stimuli as its self administering (must have some awareness) so hedonic output is reinforced
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Hernandez and Hoebel (1988) - natural reward

A

1
- measured DA levels in the NAc following natural rewards, electrical stimulation and drugs
- extracellular DA concentration was increased when food was made available in hungry rats (rapid increase), persisting for a while to create a stronger association so the rat learns there is food there
- DA levels remained elevated for 40-100 minutes after feeding stops thought to facilitate the effects on memory encoding or emotional states coupled with the food reinforcement
- need time for DA to mediate whether response is at the right level of the NAc. DA gives contextual inout to facilitate memory encoding (how and what - stimuli)
2
- also stimulated the lateral hypothalamus (LH) - DA concentration increased in the NAc whether food was there or not
- if food was available the rat would seek it out and eat it
- descending neurons from LH project to midbrain DA neurons
- VTA projects to NAc (a subset of neurons increase eating when stimulate, more D?A when food is there compared to not there)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly