performance and breach Flashcards

1
Q

What are the 3 main ways a contract can be discharged (when a valid contract comes to an end)?=

A

-Performance
-Breach
-Frustration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does performance mean?

A

Both parties carry out the obligations they have agreed in the contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the common law rule about performance?

A

Cutter v Powell- performance must be complete and exact or it will be a breach of the contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the 4 concepts which mitigate the harsh rule from Cutter v Powell?

A

Divisible contracts
-Substantial performance
-Prevention of full performance
-Acceptance of partial performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are divisible contracts?

A

Contracts which can be divided up into separate parts so that breach of one part doesn’t necessarily breach the entire contract. For example, in Richie v Atkinson where A could get the agreed price for the cargo he actually transported and R could claim damages for the rest. (The agreement was for a price per ton of cargo).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does substantial performance mean?

A

If one party has substantially performed the contract but with minor defects the other party may have to pay the contract price, minus an amount for the defective performance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

In which case was there substantial performance of the contract?

A

Hoenig v Isaacs- the work had been substantially performed and the buyer had to pay what the work was worth (quantum meruit). The case also said if the work required by the contract has been substantially performed, it can be successfully discharged rather than breached.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In which case was there not a substantial performance of the contract?

A

Bolton v Mahadeva- there was a lot of work not done properly therefore this was not substantial performance and instead a breach of contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does prevention of full performance mean?

A

If one party prevents the other from fully performing a contract as agreed, this may not be breach as non-completion is not the party’s fault. For example in Planche v Colburn, P was prevented from finishing the work by C who changed their mind about the contract, so P was entitled to claim for the work they had done.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does acceptance of partial performance mean?

A

If one party to a contract fails to complete performance, the victim of the breach can accept the partial performance and pay for what has been provided, instead of taking action for breach. The acceptance has to be voluntary and not made under any pressure- there has to be a genuine choice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

In which case was there not acceptance of partial performance?

A

Sumpter v Hedges- H had no option but to complete the work themselves as they were left with partially built houses on their land. S hadn’t completed enough of the work for it to be substantial performance, so they were in breach. H was not required to pay S for the work they had done.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What classification are terms about the time in which performance should be completed?

A

Innominate terms. They can be repudiated if the breach is serious, otherwise if the purpose of the contract is not defeated, damages will be paid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What type of term is a time stipulation that says time is ‘of the essence’?

A

A condition meaning breach can lead to repudiation and or damages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When is time ‘of the essence’?

A

-The contract expressly states that time is of the essence
-One party gives notice that time is of the essence to the other party while the contract is being performed
-The circumstances of the contract or the subject matter of the contract make it clear that time is of the essence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In which case could the contract be repudiated because late performance was a breach of condition?

A

Union Eagle v Golden Achievement- the terms of the contract stated that ‘time was of the essence’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How do you apply breach to discharge of contract?

A

Use the normal rules from classification i.e. conditions lead to repudiation and or damages, warranties lead to damages, innominate terms are treated as either conditions or warranties based on the severity of the breach.

17
Q

What are the different types of breach?

A

-Actual breach (where one party fails to perform agreed obligations wholly or partly)
-Anticipatory breach (where one party indicates they are not going to perform the contract)

18
Q

What can the victim of an anticipatory breach do?

A

-Immediately sue for damages
-Wait until the actual breach, then sue for the actual breach
However, they have a duty to mitigate their losses.

19
Q

Which case is an example of an anticipatory breach?

A

Hochster v De La Tour- V sued immediately.

20
Q

What are the risks of suing immediately for anticipatory breach?

A

The damages are assessed at the time the contract should have been performed so V may be able to sue for more than if they had sued for anticipatory breach e.g. V’s loss may increase due to market prices increasing which means they would get higher compensation than if they sued immediately.

21
Q

What are the risks of waiting until the actual breach?

A

The other business may go bankrupt in the meantime or the contract may get frustrated which means V can’t claim for any damages.