Statistics Flashcards

1
Q

What is regarded as the gold standard of scientific evidence?

A

RCTs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Population

A

The whole

ex: all pts with malnutrition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Sample

A

Part of the whole

ex: computer randomized selection of malnourished patients

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

p-value

A

How likely there is to be an actual difference between groups

ex: p < 0.05 means the likelihood the result is due to chance is less than 5%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Adequate Power

A

A study with a power of >/= 80% is considered a good study

Ex: There is an >/= 80% chance of detecting a difference as statistically significant if a true difference exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Type 1 Error

A

The error caused by rejecting a null hypothesis when it’s true (false positive)

Analogy to a false alarm

The probability of committing a type I error is equal to the level of significance that was set for the hypothesis test. Therefore, if the level of significance is 0.05, there is a 5% chance a type I error may occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Type 2 Error

A

The error that occurs when the null hypothesis is accepted when it is not true (false negative)

Analogy to a missed detection

Example, a test for a disease may report a negative result when the patient is infected. This is a type II error because we accept the conclusion of the test as negative, even though it is incorrect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Reliability

A

Is the data consistent and repeatable?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Validity

A

Is the data meaningful and useful?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Stats for reliability

Test-retest reliability

A

A measure of reliability obtained by administering the same test twice over a period of time to a group of individuals

The scores from Time 1 and Time 2 can then be correlated in order to evaluate the test for stability over time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Stats for reliability

Examples of Test-retest reliability

A
  • Cohen’s Kappa (k) - categorical variables
  • Intraclass Correlation Coefficient - continuous variables
  • Cronbach’s alpha (a)- internal consistency

Look for one of these if a measurement is being done by multiple or a single user, or many people are taking a multi-item questionnaire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Demographics table & statistical significance

A

Don’t want groups to be statistically different
>0.05 p value is a good thing here. It means that it’s the intervention is the cause, not the demographics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Effect Size

A
  • Indicates the practical importance of the outcome
  • The larger the effect size, the more impact on the population
  • A small effect size means that the research has limited practical applications
  • Independent of sample size
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Cohen’s D

A

Used to measure the effect size

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Odds Ratio vs Risk Ratio

A

Comparing 2 different groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Odds Ratio

A

The ratio of 2 odds

ex: if an odds ratio is 1.52, this means there is a 52% increase (1.52 = 152%) in the odds of meeting the protein goal in the IF group as compared to the CF group

17
Q

Relative Risk/Risk Ratio

A

The ratio of 2 probabilities

If >1: the probability of meeting 80% of protein target in IF group was higher than the CF group
If =1: IF no better than CF
If <1: CF higher probability than IF