murder Flashcards
1
Q
list cases related to murder and chnm
A
- bachan singh v punjab
- macchi singh v punjab
- shabnam v uoi
- shivaji chintappa v state of mh
- state of rajasthan v luv kush meena
- mithu singh v state of punjab
- rampal singh v state
- rawalpenda venkalu v state of hyd -300(1)
- vasant v state of mh - 300(1)
- ramsagar yadav v state of up- 300(2)
- virsa singh v state of punjab- 300(3)
- laxman kalu nikalje v state of MH- 300(3)
- r v poulton
- r v reeves
2
Q
mithu singh v state of punjab
A
- struck down 303(3)- dp for those serving LI who’ve committed murder
- colonial aspect
- arbitrary as it denies two stageprocess- trial and sentencing
3
Q
shabnam v uoi
A
- killed family members ruthlessly
- pardon pleas got rejected
- death sentence valid
4
Q
shivaji chintappa patil v state of MH
A
- Beyond reasonable doubt test
5
Q
rampal singh v state
A
ch is genus and murder is species
6
Q
state of raj v luv kush meena
A
- cannot get employed if you’ve been acquitted on the grouds of beyond reasonable doubt for a heinous crime.
- there should be acquittal based on total absence of evidence
7
Q
rawalpenda venkalu v state of hyderabad
A
- deceased’s land was occupied by second appellant’s family.
- locked him in his house and set it on fire- threatened those who tried to help
- falls under 300(1)
8
Q
vasant singh v state of mh
A
- social worker run over
- 300(1)
9
Q
ram sagar yadav v state of up
A
- police brutality- judge went to verandah and saw the state
- liable under 300(2)
- prevent police atrocities
10
Q
virsa v state of punjab
A
- spear wound in abdomen
- 4 essentials- injury, nature, intention—-> sufficient in the ordinary course to cause death?
- here intention was not found by hc
- relates to 300(3)
11
Q
laxman kalu nikalje v state of mh
A
- SIL stabbed bro-> stab wound on chest
- died due to auxiliary artery being cut+ veins= hemorrhage and shock
- not on a vital part and dispute was not such to warrant a homicidal attack—> doubt on intention
12
Q
cases related to exceptions of CHAM
A
- Mohinderpal jolly v state of punjab -pd
- lacchmi koeri v state of bihar - pd
3, nathan v state of madras- pd - dakhi singh v state- lawful duty
- dharman v state of punjab - sudden fight
6, manke ram v state of haryana - sudden fight - km nanavati v state of mh- provocation
- r v ahluwalia- provocation
- ujagar singh - consent
- dasarath paswan v state of bihar - consent
- sreedharan v state of kerala- provocation
- devku bhika v state of gujarat- provocation
- arun raj v uoi
- kali charan and ors v state- provocation
int laws - r v duffy
- r v bedder
- camplin v dpp
- holmes v dpp
- mancin v dpp
- r v richens
- r v lesbini
- r v newell
13
Q
lacchmi koeri v state of bihar
A
acccused guilty for theft. apprehended by police. fists. went and fell in naali, more fists
exceeded right to pd
14
Q
nathan v state of madras
A
old lady asked tenants to evict forcibly and she was killed
right to pd exceeded
15
Q
mohinderpal jolly v state of punjab
A
factory workers strike case
