Behavioural Influences Flashcards

1
Q

What are 5 effects of behaviour on attitudes?

A

Self-Perception, Role-playing, behavioural exploration, cognitive dissonance and hypocrisy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is behavioural exploration

A

Ways in which people learn attitudes from direct experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How did Regan and Fazio demonstrate behavioural exploration?

A

Asked participants to learn about 5 new puzzles. One group played with them for 20 minutes (direct exp) and the other group read the instructions.
Reported attitudes and left to play with the puzzles
The direct exp group reported attitudes that were good predictors of time spent playing
Instruction group reported attitudes that were weak predictors of time spent playing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How did Fazio et al demonstrate behavioural exploration in a video game?

A

‘Beanfest’ where ptps had to find good beans and avoid bad beans
Player would learn to like and frequently visit areas where good beans were
Would have bad attitudes towards new beans that looked similar to already existing bad beans
Ptps overall feelings on experience depended on how many bad beans they encountered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is weighting bias?

A

How quickly we make a decision toward an attitude object based on negative info more than positive info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What individual difference influences weighting bias?

A

Whether people approach or avoid stimulus which is based on if they have a positive or negative bias.
Positive bias = approach = gain more info
Negative bias = avoid = generalise more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How did Janis and Mann demonstrate the effect of role-playing on smoking attitudes?

A

Smokers who had to role play as someone who has lung cancer reported more negative attitudes towards smoking than those that just observed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How did Janis and King demonstrate the effect of role-playing on debates?

A

Those that had to argue in favour of a stance were more in favour of that stance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the reason for role-playing having such an effect on attitudes according to janis and king?

A

Search in memory to find info that supports their role
Leads to explore more arguments towards that position and ignore contradicting info
Could base subsequent attitudes on this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is self-perception

A

When attitudes are weak, ambiguous or uninterpretable, you may base that attitude on your previous behaviour as would an outside observer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How has self-perception inspired the way we reward and teach children?

A

If you reward a child for some behaviours, they may infer that they actually dislike the behaviour. In particular for behaviours they already ‘like’ - make’s behaviour less likable on its own rather than for the reward = overjustification effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How can self-perception be applied to consumer decisions according to Ge et al

A

Products that were hidden rather than immediately accessible were rated more positively because the consumer had to make an effort to find them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What frequency vocabulary is often used to measure how likely someone will engage in a behaviour

A

Never, Rarely, Occasionally, Sometimes, Frequently, Always

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How did Salancik and Conway demonstrate self-perception using the frequency vocabulary?

A

Participants received one of two types of religious questionnaires; pro or anti-religious behaviour salient and items included either;
Pro-Religious items = used frequenty/always
Anti-Religious items = used never/rarely

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the result of Salancik and Conway’s study on pro/anti-religious attitudes

A

They would infer their attitude based on how frequently they engaged in religious behaviour
Those in the anti-religious behaviour salient condition had more negative attitudes than the other condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How did Chaiken and Baldwin add to Salancik and Conway’s study?

A

They looked at what moderates the self-perception effect by seeing if it depended on weak/ambiguous attitudes (attitude strength)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What were examples of the pro/anti-eco behaviour salient items in Chaiken and Baldwin’s study?

A

Anti: I occasionally pick up litter/I frequently leave the lights on
Pro: I frequently pick up litter/I occasionally leave the lights on

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What were the results of Chaiken and Baldwin’s study?

A

Main effect of Pro and Anti-salience condition
Moderated by strength of prior attitude; Those with weak attitudes showed a great difference between the two conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What did Albaraccin and Wyer find about the effects of just imagining doing a behaviour on attitudes?

A

It had the same effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is vicarious self-perception?

A

When we can infer our attitudes when we see someone else performing a behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

When does vicarious self-perception occur

A
  • When we believe the person freely chose to perform the behaviour
    AND
  • We perceive we have a shared identity with the person performing the behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

How did Goldstein and Cialdini demonstrate vicarious self-perception?

A

Ptps were manipulated to feel they had shared identity with the person being observed (asked to imagine being interviewee in a transcript/shared brainwaves)
Read that the interviewee helped someone before the interview/helped the researcher
Ptps reported their own attributes
Result: reported attributes similar to the behaviour observed/helped researcher with extra surveys

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is the opposite of dissonance?

A

Consonance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What does the amount of cognitive dissonance depend on?

A

How important the attitude/topic is to you

25
Q

What 3 ways can cognitive dissonance be relieved?

A

Add consonant elements (convince self evidence is flawed)
Reduce importance
Change dissonant elements

26
Q

What is post-decisional dissonance?

A

When a decision is made between alternatives that are close in overall value and the decision cannot be revoked or changed

27
Q

How did Brehm demonstrate post-decisional dissonance?

A

Ptps asked to rate appliances and then choose between the two.
20 mins later asked to rate them again
Result: Increase in attitude to the chosen appliance and decrease in attitude to rejected appliance

28
Q

What is differentiation and consolidation theory?

A

States the process of maximising the attractiveness of the chosen alternative in comparison to its competitor starts early in the decision process
Even if chosen alt loses some of its value, its protected by potential post-decisional dissonance

29
Q

What is name of the result shown in Brehm’s study of post-decisional dissonance?

A

Spreading of the Alternatives

30
Q

What other contexts has post-decisional dissonance been found in?

A

Children as young as 4 and capuchin monkeys

31
Q

What happens if the person is given the opportunity to change their mind after choosing between two alternatives, according to Gilbert and Ebert?

A

When participants were told their decision between two paintings was reversible, they evaluated the chosen painting more negatively
So it makes people think more about the flaws of chosen alt.

32
Q

What does the spreading of the alternatives serve as? What is this called?

A

An action orientation - helps us move on rather than deliberate
Action Based Model

33
Q

What factors were linked to a greater effect of spreading of the alternatives?

A

Behavioural approach sensitivity - the tendency to engage in goal-orientated behaviour
Posture - lying down reduced effect
neuro-feedback training on the left frontal cortex

34
Q

When does effort justification occur

A

When people endure hardship without an obvious reward

35
Q

How did Aronson and Mills demonstrate effort justification?

A

ptps face initiation to group discussion on sex
Mild; read aloud a series of mild sex related words
Severe: severe words related to sex
Then told screening took too long and would have to just sit and observe discussion
Result: Severe condition had more positive attitude compared to mild/control

36
Q

How did Axom and Cooper demonstrate effort justification in a longitudinal study?

A

Participants took part in training sessions and were told they would increase ‘neuropsychological arousal’ and emotional sensitivity related to weight lost (not true)
High effort = 50 minutes
Low effort = 10 minutes
Result: Those in the high effort condition showed the greatest amount of weight loss in the next year

37
Q

What does effort justification appear to depend on according to Benozio and Diesendruck

A

Cognitive development; occurs in 6 year olds but not 4 year olds

38
Q

What are the consumer applications of effort justification according to Norton, Mochon and Ariely?

A

Ptps prefer products they’ve build themselves more than same product built by someone else
Only present if they finish building or it isn’t disassembled

39
Q

What is counter-attitudinal advocacy?

A

Saying what you don’t believe - something opposite to your actual attitude

40
Q

How did Festinger and Carlsmith demonstrate counter-attitudinal advocacy?

A

Ptps had to carry out a boring tasks; empty and refill a tray with spools and use other hand to turn pegs for 30 minutes each
Asked ptp to tell next ptp the task was enjoyable and interesting and offered either $1 or $20
Then gave attitude towards experiment (enjoyable and participate in similar exp)
Result: $1 group rated the experiment higher than the $20 group

41
Q

What impactful conclusion can be made by Festinger and Carlsmith’s study?

A

More incentive does not necessarily cause more favourable attitude

42
Q

What is the cause for counter-attitudinal advocacy?

A
  • What to appear consistent (altho doesn’t explain persistence of att change)
  • Threat to self = want to appear honest and fit this belief
43
Q

When can counter-attitudinal advoacy be reduced?

A

When given the change to re-affirm their self-integrity by expressing values

44
Q

How did Verplanken and Holland show the effect of self-affirmation on the effect of counter-attitudinal advocacy?

A

1) pre-measured values that included pro-environmental
2) Asked to suggest cuts in government’s budget that would force them to choose a big cut in pro-environmental programs
3) Then asked to choose between 20 TVs and described in terms of several attributes including environmental.
Result: Ptps who highly self-valued pro-environmental attitudes and were then forced to make cuts in that department made more pro-environmental choices in the consumer choice task

45
Q

How did Croyle and Cooper demonstrate the effect of Induced Compliance on physiological arousal

A

Ptps wrote essay advocating ban for alcohol on campus. Choice was either made salient or not
Ptps skin conductance higher after essay only if choice made salient

46
Q

How did Zanna and Cooper demonstrate the effect of misattributing Arousal on the effects of Induced Compliance

A

Ptps were given pill and told it would either make them anxious or relaxed
Ptps choice to write counter attitudinal essay made salient or not
Result: In anxious condition there was no dissonance effect as they could attribute feeling to pill but effect was increased in relaxed condition as couldn’t attribute it to pill

47
Q

What elicits dissonance?

A

Hypocrisy

48
Q

What is hypocrisy?

A

Publicly endorse one behaviour but do the opposite

49
Q

How did Stone et al investigate hypocrisy?

A

Ptps told to advocate for safe sex either;
On video (public commitment)
In an essay
Then told to think of times they didn’t engage in safe sex
DV: condoms taken after and how many times engages in safe sex 3 months later
Result: ptps in the public commitment and failures made salient took the most condoms and reported more safe sex 3 months later

50
Q

When is behavioural change reduced after hypocrisy is made salient?

A

If they can misattribute their arousal

51
Q

How did Fried show the effects of hypocrisy on attitudes when hypocrisy is made more public

A

Made ptps list of failures to recycle
Experimenter then read failures out loud
Result: no subsequent behavioural change

52
Q

Explain the result found by Fried on hypocrisy being made more public and behavioural change

A

Person forms less positive attitude towards recycling because once behaviour is made public you can’t change it so therefore need to change attitude to reduce dissonance

53
Q

When does hypocrisy cause behavioural change according to Focella?

A

More moral topics;
Ptp exposed to either member of in-group or out-group. Leader of ingroup advocated for use of sunscreen but made clear they don’t use it
Ptp of ingroup advocated for use of sunscreen more to uphold integrity of group

54
Q

Why would some engage in hypocrisy?

A
  • Bad judgement
  • Situational pressure
  • Moral hypocrisy = egoistic motive to appear moral while also trying to avoid the cost of being moral
55
Q

What did Peterson et al find about the moderating effect of self-esteem on hypocrisy

A

Ptps were all smokers
Hypocrisy; deliver a speech on dangers of smoking and write a passage on importance of healthy lifestyle
Measured self-esteem and intention to stop smoking
Those with low self esteem showed increased intention to stop smoking in hypocrisy condition whilst high SE showed very little increase

56
Q

How did Gaffney et al expand on Focella et al’s study on the effect of witnessing other’s hypocrisy?

A

Ptps listening to an interview of ingroup expressing importance of walking or cycling over car travel but admitted taking car on short journeys.
Some ptps listened with a third party who was either part of the ingroup or outgroup and either pointed out the hypocrisy or not
Measured how much ptp endorsed pro-envrionemental views
Outgroup + hypocrisy salient = greatest endorsement
Ingroup + hypocrisy salient = no effect

57
Q

What is social judgement theory

A

attitudes can include latitudes of acceptance, rejection and non commitment

58
Q

How does social judgement theory link to dissonance and self-perception

A

If the behaviour is discrepant from person’s attitude and latitude of
Rejection = dissonance occurs
Acceptance = self-perception occurs