Robbery Flashcards

1
Q

What is stated in S.8 Theft Act 1968?

A

Robbery is theft aggravated by the use of or threat of force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What statute is robbery defined in?

A

Section 8 of the Theft Act 1968

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the actus reus of robbery?

A

The defendant committed the theft, while using or threatening force against any person, immediately before or during the theft in order to commit it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was held in R v Walters?

A

The conviction of robbery was quashed due to no intention to permanently deprive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was held in Corcoran v Anderton?

A

The theft was complete, as the appropriation had taken place, so the defendants were also convicted of robbery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was held in R v Dawson and James?

A

Convictions were upheld as ‘force’ is an ordinary word and is up to a jury to decide whether force was used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was held in R v Clouden?

A

Snatching a basket from the lady was held to be a use of force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was held in P v DPP?

A

The defendant snatched a cigarette from the victims hand. The defendant was not guilty of robbery as they had not touched the victim in any way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was held in R v Bentham?

A

The defendant imitated possessing a firearm to provoke fear and commit the theft, so the House of Lords found him guilty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was held in B and R v DPP?

A

Even though the victim did not actually feel threatened, the divisional court found the defendant guilty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does the word ‘any’ imply in relation to a ‘threat or use of force towards any person’?

A

The person who is threatened does not actually have to be the victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was held in R v Hale?

A

The theft was ongoing as they gagged the victim and left the house.
Appropriation was held to be a “continuing act”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Who, in R v Hale, stated that appropriation was a continuing act?

A

Eveleigh LJ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the mens rea of robbery?

A

The defendant:
- Must have the mens rea for theft
- Must intend to use force or the threat of force to steal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Who suggested a reform of robbery?

A

Andrew Ashworth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What article was written by Andrew Ashworth?

A

‘Robbery Reassessed’

17
Q

What did Ashworth suggest in ‘Robbery Reassessed’?

A

That Robbery should have different degrees/levels relating to the amount of force used.
Or, that robbery isn’t an offence and the person should be charged with theft and the relevant assault