Words Flashcards

1
Q

Hearings

A

In law, a hearing is a proceeding before a court or other decision-making body or officer, such as a government agency or a legislative committee

A judge may order parents to attend hearings and those who do not appear can face criminal charges

Trial Procedure: No preliminary hearing is held, and a judge alone conducts all trials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Institutions

A

If found to be delinquent, juveniles could be sent indefinitely to correctional or training institutions

Section 92 - listed the powers of the provinces. The powers included: Hospitals, Justice, Public Lands, Municipal Institutions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Gender

A

Discrimination: treating individuals unfairly because of race, gender, sexual orientations, religion, age, or challenge

Canadian Bill of Rights (1960) - stated that it was illegal to discriminate based on gender

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Marijuana

A

Cannabis - Dope, Weed, Pot, Ganga
This is sold as resin (Hash) or as a dry herb. Buds are more potent than the stalks and leaves. It is usually smoked in a roll up. Effects: users feel relaxed, giggly, and talkative. Problems: can feel anxious, paranoid and forgetful

Schedule 2: Cannabis (revoked)
Possession: Max 5 years imprisonment
Possession for the purpose of trafficking: max 5 years imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Crime

A

In ordinary language, a crime is an unlawful act punishable by a state or other authority. The term crime does not, in modern criminal law, have any simple and universally accepted definition, though statutory definitions have been provided for certain purposes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Anti Semitism

A

Hostility to or prejudice against Jewish people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Notwithstanding

A

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms: Provinces were allowed the notwithstanding clause which provided exemption from some provisions of the Charter

Legal rights can be limited by the “notwithstanding” clause of section 33

Equality Rights: Affirmative action programs do allow special treatment for those who are disadvantaged. These rights may be limited by the “notwithstanding” provisions sections 33

“Notwithstanding” (s. 33) - This section of the Charter allows the government to pass laws which may interfere with
Fundamental freedoms, Legal rights, Equality rights
This action is only valid for five years after which it must be reaffirmed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Summary Conviction

A

A summary offence is a criminal act that has no jury trial
Summary conviction offences are punishable to a maximum penalty of 6 month of imprisonment, a fine of $5000 or both

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Invitation

A

Invitation to Sexual Touching - no one can invite a child under the age of 16 to touch himself/herself or them for a sexual purpose – Penalty max 10 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Arson

A

It is intentional fire setting or attempting to set fire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Mental Disorder Automatism

A

The mental disorder automatism leads to Not Criminally Responsible finding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Non Mental Disorder Automatism

A

The non-mental disorder automatism leads to an acquittal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Duress

A

It is available when a person commits an offence while under compulsion of a threat made for the purpose of compelling him to commit it
It does not apply where the offence is high treason or treason, murder, piracy, attempted murder, sexual assault, sexual assault with a weapon, threats to a third party or causing bodily harm, aggravated sexual assault, forcible abduction, hostage taking, robbery, assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm, aggravated assault, unlawfully causing bodily harm or arson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Authority

A

The Criminal Code protects 16 and 17 year olds against sexual exploitation, where the sexual activity occurs within a relationship of trust, authority, dependency

Sexual Exploitation - no one in a position of trust or authority over 16 or 17 years old or upon whom the young person is dependant, can touch any part of the body of the young person for a sexual purpose or invite that young person to touch himself/herself for a sexual purpose – Penalty: max 10 years

Acting in authority - This section provides a statutory defence to a criminal charge. Given the dangerous and demanding work of police, the conduct should not be judged against a standard
use of force by a police officer. The court should consider that: The officer is required or authorized by law to perform an action in the enforcement of the law. The officer acts on reasonable grounds in performing the actions ho or she is required or authorized by law to perform. The officer does not use unnecessary force.

Trespass Torts (trespass to land) - happens when a person enters the land of another without permission of proper authority. This protection includes the area above and below the actual plot of land.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Duty of Care

A

Generally the plaintiff in a tort law action must show that the defendant violated the relevant duty of care. Then, they have to convince a judge that this violation caused harm

Duty of Care: The first element of negligence is known as the “duty of care”. A duty of care arises when the law recognized a relationship between two parties, and due to this relationship, one party has a legal obligation to act in a certain manner toward the other

Breach: The second element of negligence is a breach of the duty of care. A person or entity (such as a business or government agency) breaches the duty of care by failing to exercise reasonable care in fulfilling the duty

Causation: The third element of negligence is causation. The breach of the duty of care must be the legal cause of the harms suffered by the injured person. There are two distinct but closely related components of legal causation: actual cause and proximate cause. Actual cause exists when but for the breach of duty of care. The injured person would not have suffered an injury. Proximate cause exists when the type and extent of the injured person’ injured were reasonable related to the breach of duty of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Fingerprinting

A

Youth Criminal Justice Act: Youths can only be fingerprinted and photographed when they have been charged with indictable offences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Police Discretion

A

The freedom of judgment and choices given to police officers in specified circumstances in. accordance with their governing policies. Due to police discretion, police officers have a range of choices to make when faced with certain situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Indigenous Lands

A

When Europeans began settling in North America during the 1600s, they formed partnerships with First Nation communities

From 1867-1921, Indigenous peoples were forced onto reserves, ‘assimilate’ them into European-Canadian culture, no indigenous self-government, no indigenous methods of justice

1997 - The Supreme Court established a test – if indigenous people could prove that they occupied land before Britain’s invasion, they had the right to claim title – it helped indigenous people with demands in treaty negotiations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Quebec

A

The History of Canada’s Constitution: By this act the colonies of Canada (Ontario and Quebec) were united with the colonies of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick

Agreement was finally reached between the central government and nine of the ten provinces in November of 1981, only Quebec refused to be a party to this agreement

The Meech Lake Accord 1987: This was an effort to to bring Quebec into the constitution and included the following:
1. “Distinct society” status was to be confirmed for Quebec
2. Provinces were to be given the right to nominate judges for the Supreme Court. The accord was not ratified by all ten provinces and failed

The Charlottetown Accord: This was a major constitutional amendment package which included:
1. “Distinct society” status for Quebec
2. Aboriginal self-government
3. Senate reform
It failed to pass a national referendum in October 1992

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Actus Reus

A

Latin for a “guilty act”. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Japanese Canadians

A

1941 - Pearl Harbor caused Japanese-Canadians to be “enemy aliens”, sent to internment camps, men were separated from their families and their property was auctioned off by the government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Causation

A

The third element of negligence. The breach of the duty of care must be the legal cause of the harms suffered by the injured person. There are two distinct but closely related components of legal causation: actual cause and proximate cause. Actual cause exists when but for the breach of duty of care. The injured person would not have suffered an injury. Proximate cause exists when the type and extent of the injured person’ injured were reasonable related to the breach of duty of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

hybrid Offence

A

A hybrid offence if the decision by the crown to prosecute based on the seriousness and type of crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Harassment

A

Sexual Harassment - unwelcome actions of sexual nature toward another person

Harassment - no person shall cause other persons to fear for their safety or the safety of anyone known to them. Prohibited conduct consists of:
- Repeatedly following from place to place
- Repeatedly communicating with the other person
- Watching the place where the other person resides or works
- Engaging in threatening conduct directed to any member of the person’s family
Penalty: max not exceeding 5 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Break and Enter

A

The crime of entering a building by force so as to commit burglary; breaking and entering

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

De Minimus Non Curat Lex

A

The principle excludes certain acts from criminal sanction due to triviality. The principle is based on the premise that the law should not concern itself with such matters. The doctrine is that its “harmless conduct” perpetrated by someone.
Ex - The theft of a “handful” of grapes from a grocery store, Incidental touching could be de minimus, Possession of drugs where the amounts are merely residual particles of a controlled substance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Right to Life

A

The right to life is the belief that a human being has the right to live and, in particular, should not be killed by another entity

28
Q

Deadly Force

A

It can be justified where the commission of the offence is likely to cause immediate and serious injury. When considering, the court show consider the reasonable belief of the officer in all the circumstances as they existed at the time and the facts at the time

29
Q

Civil

A

Relating to ordinary citizens and their concerns, as distinct from military or ecclesiastical matters.

2005 - Martin government changed the traditional definition of marriage and introduced the Civil Marriage Act, which defines marriage as a union between “two persons”

The government does not represent you in civil law unlike in criminal law. The conclusion of civil law is generally money

30
Q

Youth

A

JDA ages: 7-16-18

YCJA: Those 18 and over are considered adults. Children under 12 are dealt with under provincial law such as child-welfare legislation

31
Q

Persons

A

Persons Case (1929) - women finally gained legal recognition as “persons” in Canada

Fundamental principle of Canada’s criminal justice: An accused person is innocent until proven guilty

32
Q

Head Tax

A

Once the CPR (Canada’s first national railroad) was finished, a head tax of $50 was imposed on any Chinese person entering Canada. The tax was meant to discourage Chinese immigration. British Columbia barred Asian people from certain professions and did not allow them to vote

33
Q

Ethics

A

Ethics are those things deemed appropriate or not by a profession or social class that you belong to. Ethics usually have some sort of qualifier

34
Q

Doli Incapax

A

This Latin phrase refers to the presumption in law that a child is incapable of forming the criminal intent to commit an offence

35
Q

religious beliefs

A

Fundamental Freedoms (s. 2)
Freedom of conscience and religion

Equality Rights (s.15)
You have leal equality regardless of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age, mental or physical disability

36
Q

Standard of Care

A

Unintentional Torts (Negligent Torts) - occur when a party fails to act reasonably in a situation. Their conduct is said to be below the standard of care required in the circumstances. You need to prove and hold the person legally responsible for the defendant’s actions: duty, breach, causation, and damage

37
Q

Felony

A

In Canada, the term misdemeanor or felony is not used. Instead, there are summary or indictable offenses. A summary offense in Canada is similar to an American misdemeanor, while an indictable offense in Canada is similar to an American felony.

38
Q

Place to place

A

Harassment - no person shall cause other persons to fear for their safety or the safety of anyone known to them
Prohibited conduct consists of:
Repeatedly following from place to place

39
Q

Fraud

A

Wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain

A person or thing intended to deceive others, typically by unjustifiably claiming or being credited with accomplishments or qualities.

40
Q

Provocation

A

Provocation - It is a partial defence that only applies to the charge of first or second degree murder. It can only have the effect of reducing to manslaughter. The accused’s reactions or response to the even must be equally sudden
The partial defence of provocation exists in law to acknowledge the inherent frailty of the human conditions a person can reasonable act inappropriately and disproportionately, but it is understandable to a sufficiently serious wrongful act or insult

41
Q

Corrective Force

A

Corrective Force - Every school teacher, parent or person standing for a parent is justified in using force by way of correction toward a pupil or child who is under his care, if the force does not exceed what is reasonable
The “corrective” must also have “restrain or control”. Any punishment that endangers the life, health, or risk disfigurement will render the act unreasonable
Factors to be considered: Age and character of the child, nature of the issue, Circumstances and gravity of the correction, Effect of the punishment on the child

42
Q

Plaintiff

A

a person(s) who brings a case against another in a court of law

43
Q

Bill of rights

A

Existed prior to the charter, Canadian Bill of Rights (1960) - stated that it was illegal to discriminate based on gender

44
Q

Trudeau

A

1976 - Trudeau government introduced a new system reviewed an aplicant’s various skills, personal qualities, and level of education

Homosexuality was a crime in Canada until it was removed from the Criminal Code in 1967 by Pierre Trudeau, who was Justice Minister in the Pearson’s government

The Liberal government of Pierre Trudeau finally undertook this difficult task and achieved patriation in 1982

Problems Were Faced by the Pierre Trudeau Government:
Federal-Provincial agreement in Canada, A formula to amend the constitution, The Charter of Rights and Freedoms

45
Q

Law

A

The law is the minimal set of rules that are required in society so that we do not hurt one another. Its different from manners because while manners are concerned with maximizing conflict resolution and civil progress, the law is simple concerned with protecting us from each other

46
Q

Mens Rea

A

Criminal intent, The state of mind indicating culpability which is required by statute as an element of a crime

47
Q

Residential Schools

A

Refers to an extensive school system set up by the Canadian government and administered by churches that had the nominal objective of educating Indigenous children but also the more damaging and equally explicit objectives of indoctrinating them into Euro-Canadian and Christian ways of living and assimilating them into mainstream white Canadian society

48
Q

Causality

A

Causality is influence by which one event, process, state, or object contributes to the production of another event, process, state, or object where the cause is partly responsible for the effect, and the effect is partly dependent on the cause

49
Q

Indictable Offence

A

Very serious, There is no limitation period for indictable offence – this means that the police can charge a person years after the offence occurred

50
Q

Robbery

A

Unlawful taking of property from a person using force

51
Q

Abandonment

A

It must occur before the offence takes place. It is often necessary that the accused testify to explain this
Exceptions: A group have jointly planned to commit murder and the accused assisted in the initial part of the plan but then leaves part way through. A party who abandons a planned robbery but was the one who provided the others with guns can be liable for the murder arising from the robbery

Test requirements: There must be a change of intention and physical change of place, timely communication to abandon the purpose to those who desire to continue in it. The accused took reasonable steps in the circumstances either to neutralize or otherwise cancel out the effects of his or her participation or to prevent the commission of the offence

52
Q

Defendant

A

An individual, company, or institution, a court of law who has money

53
Q

Damages

A

The fourth element of negligence is damage. The injured person must have suffered an injury that can be remedied by money damages, which is the legal term for monetary compensation

Economic Damages compensate for victims for their out-of-pocket expenses and tangible, financial losses that an incident causes. Normally these cover hospital bills, lost income, property damage, and similar things.

Non-economic damages makes possible financial recovery for the intangible damage an accident or intentional act may cause. Lots of times this means pain, suffering, disfigurement, lost self-esteem.

Punitive Damages occur if the defendant’s actions were particularly reckless or outrageous, the judge can award the plaintiff with punitive damages. These are supposed to stop others from committing similar misconduct in the future

Wrongful Death Damages occur with families suffering with the loss of a loved one because of negligent or purposeful conduct are allowed to obtain financial compensation for their lost companionship, lost support, and other losses. Normally, the person bringing this claim must be a close relative or spouse.

54
Q

First Degree Murder

A

There was a clear plan and plotting for the murder

55
Q

Second Degree Murder

A

No planning but previous relationship

56
Q

Manslaughter

A

It was an accident but still needs to be accounted for

57
Q

Assault

A

An assault occurs when a person directly or indirectly applies force intentionally to another person without their consent or when a person attempts to apply such force, or threatens to do so. An injury need not occur for an assault to be committed, but the force used in the assault may have caused injury. In Canada, a consensual fight is not considered an assault.

58
Q

Consent

A

The age of consent for sexual activity is 16 years
The Criminal Code protects 16 and 17 year olds against sexual exploitation, where the sexual activity occurs within a relationship of trust, authority, dependency

Consent to physical contact: The exception to this is for sports where the conduct is part of the norms of the particular sport. Thus sports players may consent to some bodily harm necessarily incidental. However, conduct that is deliberately for the purpose of inflicting injury will not be protected. Where the use of force is unreasonable and falls outside the parameters of the sport, there can be no consent

59
Q

Sexual Exploitation

A

No one in a position of trust or authority over 16 or 17 years old or upon whom the young person is dependant, can touch any part of the body of the young person for a sexual purpose or invite that young person to touch himself/herself for a sexual purpose – Penalty: max 10 years

60
Q

Luring

A

No person may use the internet to communicate with a young person for the purpose of facilitating the commission of a sexual or abduction offence – Penalty: max 10 years

61
Q

Sexual Interference

A

No one can touch any part of the body of a child under the age of 16 for a sexual purpose – Penalty: max 10 years

62
Q

Burglary

A

Unlawfully entering a home and stealing property

63
Q

Theft

A

To steal property

64
Q

John

A

The person who receives payment for the sexual service is called a prostitute and the person who receives such services is known by “John”

The penalties include jail time - up to 5 years and minimum cash fines that go up after a first office (John)

65
Q

Alibi

A

This refers to evidence that supports the claim that the accused was not present when the offence took place, rending involvement impossible. All alibi evidence must be disclosed to the crown
There is no onus on the accused to prove an alibi. An alibi does not need to be proven, but rather it must simple raise a doubt

66
Q

Intentional

A

Done on purpose; deliberate