Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

Original Documents

A

An original document or writing includes either the original itself or a duplicate.

There are three substitutes for an original:
1. A duplicate;
2. A certified copy of a public record; or
3. Summaries of voluminous records.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Authenticating Voice Evidence

A

Voice evidence may be authenticated via opinion identifying a person’s voice — whether heard firsthand or through mechanical or electronic transmission or recording — based on hearing the voice at any time under circumstances that connect it with the alleged speaker.

Must have had firsthand knowledge that the party speaking was the party on the recording, and vice versa.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Double Hearsay

A

Hearsay included within hearsay is not excluded under the hearsay rule if each part of the combined statement conforms with an exception to the hearsay rule.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Rule of Completeness

A

Where a party introduces part of a writing or recording, the adverse party may immediately introduce any other writing or part of the writing, which, in fairness, ought to be considered in conjunction with it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Leading Questions

A

Not generally permitted during direct examination.

Sometimes permitted on direct when questioning a child, a mentally impaired witness, an expert witness, a hostile witness, or to obtain preliminary information like a name or address.

Leading questions are usually permitted upon cross-examination.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Testimony About Jury Deliberations

A

Generally, jurors may not testify about matters occurring during deliberations.

Exceptions—
- Where extraneous prejudicial information was brought to the jury’s attention,
- When an outside influence was improperly brought into jury deliberations, or
- If there was a mistake in entering the verdict on the verdict form.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Hearings Outside of the Presence of the Jury

A

The court must conduct any hearing on a preliminary question outside of the presence of the jury if: (JAW)

(1) Justice requires;
(2) Hearing involves the Admissibility of a confession; or
(3) Witness-defendant in a criminal case requests.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Unavailability of a Witness

A

Events that constitute unavailability as a witness include:
(PRIM)

  1. Privilege,
  2. Refusal,
  3. Incapacity/death, or
  4. Lack of Memory.

And/or inability to be reached by a subpoena.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Self-Authenticating Documents

A

Extrinsic evidence of authenticity as a condition precedent to admissibility is NOT required with respect to

  1. Certified documents,
  2. Official publications,
  3. Newspapers and periodicals,
  4. Trade inscriptions,
  5. Acknowledged documents, and
  6. Commercial paper.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Learned Treaties Hearsay Exception

A

If the court finds a publication to be a reliable authority, then “statements” from it may be read into evidence, but the publication may not be received as an exhibit.

The jury is not allowed to bring learned treatises into the jury room. There is a concern that if juries were allowed unrestricted access to the whole publication, they might rely on parts of the publication that are not germane to the case.

Intent of the rule is that juries need to be guided through the pertinent parts of the publication by the testifying experts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Character Evidence Definition

A

Character evidence refers to a person’s general propensity or disposition for honesty, peacefulness, or violence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Subsequent Remedial Measures

A

Evidence of remedial measures taken subsequent to any injury or harm are not admissible to prove negligence or culpable conduct.

However, may be admitted to prove ownership, control, or feasibility of precautionary measures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Habit Evidence

A

Evidence of a person’s habit or an organization’s routine practice is admissible to show that on a particular occasion, the person or organization acted in accordance with that habit or routine.

Habit: Any action done automatically and routinely without forethought.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Beyond a Reasonable Doubt Standard

A

The “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard of proof applies to criminal trials as to each element of the crime charged.

Any doubt that exists wouldn’t affect a reasonable person’s belief that the fact is true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Preponderance of the Evidence Standard

A

The “preponderance of the evidence” standard of proof applies to civil cases. A preponderance of the evidence is “just enough evidence to tip the balance in favor of the fact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Judicial Notice

A

A substitute for proof where the court accepts certain facts as true. Applies to facts that are not subject to dispute that are facts commonly known in the territory and easily verifiable facts by sources whose accuracy cannot be questioned.

In civil cases, the jury must accept the fact as true, but in criminal cases the jury cannot be required to find a fact as true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Effect of Judicial Notice on a Jury

A

A civil jury MUST take a judicially noticed fact as true, whereas a criminal jury MAY take a judicially noticed fact as true (cannot be required).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Burden of Production in a Civil Case

A

The plaintiff has the burden of production in a civil case to present evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Burden of Production in a Criminal Case

A

Prosecution has the burden of proof of establishing all elements of the crime charged.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Burden of Persuasion

A

The degree to which the evidence must be proven. Either by a preponderance of the evidence, clear and convincing, or beyond a reasonable doubt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Test for Relevancy of Evidence

A

Evidence is relevant if it (1) has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without, and (2) it is a fact of consequence.

Relevant evidence must have some probative value and be helpful to the jury in deciding the case.

Relevant evidence is generally admissible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Rule 403 Balancing Test

A

Relevant evidence may be excluded if it’s probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of:
- Unfair prejudice;
- Confusing the issues;
- Misleading the jury;
- Undue delay;
- Wasting time; or
- Cumulative evidence.

Sets a generally low bar for admissibility. To be excluded, the evidence must be substantially more prejudicial than probative.

The Rule 403 balancing test favors admission.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Types of Character Evidence

A

Reputation, opinion, or specific acts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Character Evidence as an Element/At Issue

A

Character evidence will be admissible if it is necessary to prove an element of the claim/charge. (D’NICE)

  1. Defamation.
  2. Negligent entrustment/hiring/supervision.
  3. Immigration.
  4. Child custody.
  5. Entrapment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Exceptions to the Ban on Character Evidence

A
  1. A criminal ∆ can offer evidence of their own pertinent character traits. Opens the door to the prosecution presenting character evidence to rebut.
  2. A criminal ∆ can offer pertinent character evidence of the victim in a homicide case, when bringing a claim of self-defense. Opens the door to the prosecution presenting character evidence to rebut and also can present evidence of the ∆’s same trait.
  3. In a homicide case, the prosecution can show evidence of a victim’s trait for peacefulness.
  4. Can offer character evidence of past sexual encounters between the two parties to show consent.
  5. Can offer character evidence of a victim’s past sexual encounters to show that semen/injuries came from a different sexual encounter than the ∆’s
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Conformity Character Evidence

A

The general rule is that evidence of a person’s propensity to conform with a particular character trait is inadmissible.

5 exceptions:
- When a criminal ∆ offers the evidence first.
- When the prosecution can offer evidence of the victim’s trait of peacefulness in a homicide case.
- Rape Shield laws.
- Sexual predators.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Admissibility of Pleas

A

Evidence of pleas are inadmissible, as long as the statement was actually made to a prosecutor (not a police officer or any other lawyer).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Marital Communication Privilege vs. Spousal Immunity

A

Marital Communications: Protects confidential communications between parties DURING the marriage. Parties do not have to be married at trial, but the communications sought to be privileged must have been made during the marriage. Exceptions — suits between spouses, domestic abuse, or joint participation in a crime.

Spousal Immunity: Protects everything before or during the marriage. Parties must be married at the time of trial. The testifying witness holds the privilege; one spouse cannot prevent the other spouse from testifying. ONLY APPLIES IN CRIMINAL CASES.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Work Product Doctrine

A

Work product is any material prepared in anticipation of litigation. Work product is privileged and does not have to be disclosed in discovery.

Exception: If the other party can show that there is substantial hardship, and that there is no other way to obtain the evidence.

30
Q

Exceptions to Attorney-Client Privilege

A
  • Future crimes or fraud;
  • Suits between attorney and client;
  • “Joint-client” exception.
31
Q

4 Privileges

A
  1. Attorney/client;
  2. Therapist/patient;
  3. Clergy/penitent;
  4. Spousal testimony/communication.
32
Q

Human Declarant

A

A hearsay statement must be made by a human declarant, not an animal or machine.

A dog barking, machine print out, time/temperature display, or radar measurement would not be hearsay.

33
Q

“Statement” (Hearsay)

A

An intentional oral or written assertion, or intentionally assertive conduct.

34
Q

Hearsay

A

A declarant’s out of court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted.

35
Q

Clear and Convincing Evidence

A

Significantly more likely to be true than to not be true. Evidence presented has a “high probability of truth”.

Applies to civil cases such as fraud, validity of a will, etc.

36
Q

When is Character Evidence Permitted

A

Impeachment: Can impeach the character for truthfulness.
Element: When character is an essential element being proven.

Propensity evidence is NOT admissible, unless the defendant opens the door in a criminal trial.

37
Q

Character Evidence for Impeachment

A

Character evidence is allowed in two forms to prove or disprove the trait of honesty. Can impeach by reputation or opinion evidence, but never specific acts on direct examination.

Can also impeach by prior bad acts, however, extrinsic evidence is not permitted.

38
Q

“Prior Bad Acts” Evidence

A

Character evidence of prior bad acts is inadmissible to show conforming conduct, however, may be admissible to prove motive, intent, mistake, identity, a common scheme or plan, knowledge, opportunity, or lack of accident.

Basically, as long as it is not being offered to establish that someone is acting in conformity with their character.

39
Q

Subsequent Remedial Measures

A

Evidence of subsequent remedial measures are inadmissible to prove negligence or culpability, however, they may be admissible to show ownership/control, feasibility of precautionary measures, or to impeach a witness.

40
Q

Excited Utterance

A

Hearsay exception. A statement made relating to a startling event made while under the stress of the event. Does NOT have to be immediate as long as they are still under the stress of the event.

41
Q

Present Sense Impression

A

Hearsay exception. A statement made by a declarant describing or explaining an event or condition made while or immediately after perceiving it.

Must be SAYING IT while they’re SEEING IT.

42
Q

Hearsay Exemptions

A

Are NOT hearsay.
1. Statement by a party opponent.
2. Statement of prior identification.
3. Prior consistent statement.
4. Prior inconsistent statement.

43
Q

Non-Hearsay

A

Evidence that is not being offered for the truth of the matter asserted, so cannot be excluded as hearsay.

Includes evidence regarding:
- The capacity of a witness to see, hear, or speak;
- The effect of a statement on the listener;
- Legally operative facts (defamatory words, words creating a contract, etc.);
- Verbal acts;
- Impeachment;
- State of mind.

Also includes:
- Statements by a Party Opponent
- Statements by a Party’s Agent/Co-Conspirator
- Prior Inconsistent Statements

44
Q

Crawford Rule

A

The Confrontation Clause will trump the hearsay rule. If there is testimonial hearsay in a criminal case, it will be inadmissible unless the ∆ is given the opportunity to cross-examine the declarant.

“Testimonial”: Statements made in reasonable expectation that it will be used in litigation.

Exceptions: Dying declarations, child witnesses, or statements made to address an ongoing emergency.

45
Q

Methods of Impeachment

A
  1. Prior inconsistent statements.
  2. Bias and interest.
  3. Conviction of a crime.
  4. Prior bad acts (re: truthfulness or untruthfulness; extrinsic evidence not permitted).
  5. Reputation or opinion for untruthfulness.
  6. Sensory deficiencies.
  7. Contradiction.
46
Q

Reliability of Expert Testimony

A

Apply the Daubert test. (It’s a TRAP!)

  • Has the theory been Tested?
  • What is the degree/Rate of error?
  • Is there general Acceptance in the scientific community?
  • Has the method been Peer reviewed?

Minority rule: Frye; general acceptance in the scientific community.

47
Q

Scope of Lay Witness Testimony

A

“Common sense and common knowledge.”

Includes testimony regarding:
- The value of one’s own property;
- The emotional state of others;
- Measurements (speed, height, weight)
- Physical states (healthy, short, etc.)
- Sensory descriptions (smell, sound, color).

48
Q

Hearsay Exceptions that Require Unavailability

A
  1. Former testimony.
  2. Dying declaration.
  3. Declaration against interest.
  4. Statement of personal/family history.
  5. Forfeiture by wrongdoing (witness intimidation).
49
Q

When is the original not required under the Best Evidence Rule?

A
  • When the issue is collateral.
  • When the original is lost.
  • When the opponent refuses to turn it over.
  • When it is testimony or an admission.
  • When it can’t be acquired by subpoena.
50
Q

Best Evidence Rule

A

Where the contents of a document are at issue, the original copy of the document is required. No testimony as to the contents of the documents are allowed unless the original is excused.

Reduces the risk of fraud, forgery, or mistake.

Duplicates ARE admissible unless there is an issue of authenticity.

51
Q

Self-Authenticating Documents

A
  1. Certified documents;
  2. Official publications;
  3. Newspapers or periodicals;
  4. Trade inscriptions (Nike swoosh, etc.);
  5. Acknowledged documents (notarized);
  6. Commercial paper.
52
Q

How to Authenticate Documents

A

By testimony of someone with personal knowledge or familiarity of the item, or if the item is self-authenticating.

53
Q

Exceptions that Require the Declarant to be Unavailable

A

(Evidence sucks a FFAT D)
- Family History + Forfeiture by Wrongdoing
- Against Interest (Statement against interest)
- Testimony (Former)
- Dying Declaration

54
Q

Exceptions When the Declarant is Available OR Unavailable

A
  • Present sense impression
  • Excited utterance
  • Statement made for purposes of medical treatment or diagnoses
  • Business/public records
  • Recollection recorded
  • Then-existing state of mind
  • Prior statement of identification
55
Q

Hearsay Exemptions/Non-Hearsay

A

Statement by a party opponent, statement by a party opponent’s agent or co-conspirator, prior inconsistent statements.

56
Q

Lay Witness Testimony

A

A witness must have knowledge of the matter that they testify about. A lay witness must have personal knowledge.

Opinion must be rationally based on their perception, helpful, and NOT based on scientific, technical, or specialized knowledge.

57
Q

Expert Witness Testimony

A

An expert witness, unlike a lay witness, does not need personal knowledge, and instead, can testify based on facts that they have learned during the trial, or through some other means.

58
Q

Past Convictions as Impeachment

A

A prior conviction can be used to impeach a witness in certain circumstances.

Nature of the crime — Either a felony or misdemeanor relating to dishonesty; or any felony if it passes the balancing test)

Time of the crime — Must be within 10 years of the conviction or release from imprisonment. If more than 10 years has passed, it is generally not admissible.

If the Witness is the Defendant in a Criminal Trial — A prior conviction is LESS likely to be admitted for impeachment if the witness is a defendant in their own criminal trial because the probative value must outweigh its prejudicial effect, which is unlikely.

59
Q

Offer to Pay Medical Expenses

A

Not admissible to prove liability or the existence of an injury.

60
Q

Offer to Settle

A

Not admissible to prove the validity of a disputed claim.

61
Q

Insurance

A

The existence of an insurance policy is not admissible to prove liability, but may be used to prove agency, ownership & control, or impeachment.

62
Q

Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause

A

If a statement is testimonial, the declarant is unavailable, and the defendant did not have the opportunity to cross-examine the declarant, then admission of the statement may violate the defendant’s right to confrontation.

However, a statement is NOT “testimonial” if the primary purpose of the statement is to address an ongoing emergency.

63
Q

Physician-Patient Privilege

A

A patient is privileged to refuse to disclose (and to prevent any other person from disclosing) confidential communications made for the purpose of diagnosis or treatment of his physical, mental, or emotional condition.

The privilege extends to people participating in the diagnosis or treatment under the direction of a physician (like a nurse).

Does NOT apply to rescuers.

64
Q

Prior CONSISTENT Statements

A

A declarant’s prior consistent statements are NOT hearsay if the declarant is testifying and subject to cross examination, and the prior consistent statement is being offered to:
1. Rebut an allegation that the witness-declarant fabricated their statement, or acted under an improper motive in testifying; or
2. To rehabilitate the declarant’s credibility as a witness.

65
Q

Prior INCONSISTENT Statements

A

A declarant’s prior inconsistent statements are NOT hearsay if the declarant is testifying and subject to cross examination, and the statement is inconsistent with the declarant’s testimony and was given under penalty of perjury at a trial, hearing, or other proceeding or in a deposition.

66
Q

Certificate of Conviction Hearsay Exception

A

FRE 803(22) allows admission of an otherwise hearsay certificate of conviction if: (1) the conviction is for a felony offense; and
(2) it is necessary to prove an essential element in the civil case.

67
Q

Public Records Hearsay Exception

A

FRE 803(8) allows admission of an otherwise hearsay record or statement of a public office if it sets out:
(1) the office’s activities;
(2) a matter observed while under a legal duty to report, but not including, in a criminal case, a matter observed by law enforcement personnel; or
(3) in a civil case or against the government in a criminal case, factual findings from a legally authorized investigation.

68
Q

Dying Declaration

A

Admissible when:
(1) The declarant is unavailable;
(2) the declaration was made while the declarant believed his death was imminent;
(3) the declaration concerned the cause or circumstances of what the declarant believed to be his imminent death; and
(4) the declaration is offered in either a homicide prosecution OR a civil proceeding.

The FRE broadened the traditional use of dying declarations in that the declarant need not die (only be unavailable) and the declaration can be used in civil actions.

The FRE broadened the traditional use of dying declarations in that the declarant need not die (only be unavailable) and the declaration can be used in civil actions.

69
Q

Preliminary Questions of Admissibility

A

FRE 104 include:
(1) The competency of a witness to testify;
(2) Whether a hearsay exception applies; or
(3) Whether a privilege exists.

70
Q

Other Admissible Reasons for Admitting Character Evidence

A

MIMIC
To prove Motive, Intent, (absence of) Mistake, Identity, or a Common plan or scheme.

71
Q

Business Records Exception

A

Hearsay exception. It’s easy as ABC!
(1) At or near the time of occurrence,
(2) By someone with knowledge of the event and a duty to record, and
(3) made in the Course of business.