Lecture 6 Flashcards

1
Q

data, phenomena en theory bij diffusion model

A

data = response time, accuracy
phenomena = global slowing (in elderly)
theory = diffusion model says it is caution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

frequentism can be a useful tool for a particular set of data, limited purposes. but their purpose is fine. bayesian approach does not observe the limits of its territory because it claims too much. this is also a tool.

A

oke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

the concept of probability was obscure in history, only in the …

A

17-18th century -> people gained insight that it has lawfullness, in the long run!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

probability =

A

the relative frequency in which an event occurs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

wat dacht fisher

A

the insight that chance/probability should not be banned from research design, but used:
- random assignment (letting change allocate subjects to conditions)
- random sampling (letting change choose which elements from the population will be in your sample)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

if you use random sampling, then…

A

you know what the sampling distribution of your statistic is

= lawfull behaviour because you use probability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

wat zegt p(D|H) bijvoorbeeld

A

the probability of a data (D) occuring given that hypothesis (H) is true. this equals the relative frequency with which D would be observed if H were true and we repeatedly drew samples of the same size as the original one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

is p(D|H) real?

A

yes! it is real! not an opinion. therefore frequentist laws are not opinions. in that sense, frequentism is objective, it definitely has a value.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

wat doe je bij statistical inference

A

bij using p(D|H) judiciously, one can quantify uncertainty.
-> probability of observing data at least as extreme as d given that H is true. -> control the probability of type 1 and type 2 errors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

wat is de standard null hypothesis

A

guarantees at most 5% of type 1 errors if you do this many times (at most, in 5% of the times you will incorrectly conclude that something works when it does not)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

advantages of the null hypothesis test

A
  • null hypothesis tests can be constructed for ALL research designs
  • the p-value always has the same interpretation
  • correct execution of tests guarantees 5% type 1 errors at most
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

p-value interpretation

A

how likely it is that your data would have occurred by random chance (i.e. if the null hypothesis is true).

if we were to repeat the experiment and the null hypothesis were true, then we would find such extreme deviations in a% of the cases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

wat is een voorwaarde aan het gebruiken van de p waarde

A

wat je doet met het resultaat, ligt aan jou. jij moet een reden bedenken waarom jouw experiment geslaagd is (of niet) en waarom jouw alpha level rechtvaardigt is. je moet er echt over nadenken!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

wat is het verschil met de incorrecte interpretatie

A

the p value is the probability of finding these extreme kinds of data. it is not the probability that the null hypothesis is true!!!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

wat is de probability that the null hypothesis is true?

A

that probability does not exist. because probabiltiy is a long run frequency in a chance experiment, and the truth of hypotheses is not a function of a change experiment. an hypothesis is either correct, or not correct. it is not true one day and then false another (that is what probability is: on what side of the coin will it fall?)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what do bayesians claim

A

they claim that they can actually distill p(H) from the data.

17
Q

what is the price of deriving p(H) from the data

A

you have to drop the objective frequentist definition of probability

18
Q

how do the bayesians do this (which formula)

A

p(H|data) = P(Data|H) * P(H)

19
Q

what does p(H) mean in Bayesian terms

A

the degree of belief one ought to attach to H

dus hoeveel je wil geloven in p(H)

20
Q

wat is kritiek op bayesian

A

wat bedoelen ze met the degree of belief one ought to attach to H? what does that mean? idk how to do that?

21
Q

dus wat is conclusie van frequentism

A
  • p value has some downsides, waaronder de misinterpretatie
  • frequentist tools are limited, but useful in some situation. bayesian tools are also limited and useful.
  • bayesian results are at least as complicated: will they not generate the same problems?
  • bayesian techniques are tools among other tools!
  • human nature is the problem, not frequentism (ppl love magic bullets). bayesian statistics are often sold as remedies for poor use of statistical tools. (silly) -> we need to teach people how to reason with probabilities
22
Q

when should you choose bayes according to bayesians

A
  • if you want to learn efficiently
  • if you want to adjust plausibility assessments for hypotheses or parameters according to predictive performance
23
Q

is bayesian statistics subjective

A

yes, existing knowledge is applied to ask meaningful questions.
but it is not arbitraty: every bayesian with the same backgroun knowledge draws an identical conclusion

24
Q

waarom is het niet erg dat bayesian subjective is

A

alles in onderzoek is subjective; developing a theory,proposing predictions, designing an experiment

-> science is inherently subjective, but it is not arbitrary!

25
Q

statement wagenmakers

A

one statistical analysis must not rule them all!

26
Q

what are benefits from bayesian statistics

A
  • Learning from prediction errors;
  • Quantifying evidence, also in favor of H0;
  • Adjusting knowledge on the go;
  • Obtaining answers to meaningful questions.
27
Q

the current state of affairs

A
  • The Bayesian paradigm is now mainstream.
  • Psychology curricula lag modern statistics by decades.
  • Philosophical discussions about chance are misused to hide the fact that teachers are too lazy to introduce Bayes into the curriculum.
28
Q

what is the conclusion of bayesian

A
  • The Bayesian framework offers concrete, practical advantages, and this is increasingly being recognized.
  • It is a missed opportunity that the Bayesian framework is undervalued in your statistical training.
29
Q

definition of p value: frequentism vs bayesian

A

fr = probability of observing the same or more extreme data assuming the the null hypothesis is true

ba= the probability of the null hypothesis (p(H))

30
Q

large samples needed: frequentism vs bayesian

A

fr= usually needed, when normal theory based methods are used

ba = not necessarily needed

31
Q

inclusion of prior knowledge possible? frequentism vs bayesian

A

fr = no
ba= yes

32
Q

nature of parameters in the model? frequentism vs bayesian

A

fr= unknown but fixed
ba = unknown and therefore random

33
Q

population parameter: frequentism vs bayesian

A

fr = one true value

ba = unknown and therefore random

34
Q

uncertainty is defined by: frequentism vs bayesian

A

fr = the sampling distribution based on the idea of infinite repeated sampling

ba = the probability distribution for the population parameter

35
Q

estimated interval: frequentism vs bayesian

A

fr= confidence interval, over an infinity of samples taken from the population, 95% of these contain the true population value

ba= credibility interval, a 95% probability that the population value is within the limits of the interval