The Legal System Flashcards
what is a law?
A set of enforceable rules that are seen as binding on the community and impartial as a whole. It is a set of rules are is officially recognised. There are consequences if they are not breached, which are imposed by the institutions that govern society.
define ethics
Rules or standards governing the conduct of a person, not members of the profession, what we consider right or wrong
What do laws reflect?
laws are intended to reflect traditional and current ethics. Sometimes not the case, example transgender jails made by sovereign power (parliament) through statutes. 
three characteristics of laws.
- Binding on the whole community
- reflect rights and duties
- discoverable people can find out about them easily
- can be enforced backed by punishment
how are laws made?
- roles governing behaviour to maintain order, based on customs/ traditions/ values
- penalties attached to members of a group if they fail to follow the rules from authorities (the gov)
- overtime, these rules become formalised as laws
define rule
regulations governing procedure or conduct. they are not enforceable l. originate from our customs.
define customs
collective habits/ behaviour developed overtime through generations
define value
principals or standards consisted desirable by society
define customary law
principals developed according to a people, nation treated as obligatory and accepted as a legal requirement
how is the Australian Legal System influenced?
- International Laws
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders Laws
- English Laws
define impartial
treating everyone the same regardless of social status
characteristics of just laws:
impartial laws:
- every law has to recognise human rights (eg aboritan rights, same sec marriage)
- every law should be accessible online
how are laws consistent in society?
- all laws have to be applied equally to everyone
- equal status (being treated the same)
- laws don’t discriminate and apply equally
- despite striving for equality, the legal system takes into account different capacities
how are the laws fair?
- legal system responding to difference
- applies to everyday life whereas justice has legal connotations
- fairness and equality are opposites
are laws accessible?
- legal representation
- all individuals have access to the legal system and awareness of their rights and responsibilities
- legal aid aims to resolve the issue to access for disadvantaged persons. however, the merit based system has problems
- achieving justice as the disadvantaged can have legal representation
what are the features of procedural fairness/ natural justice?
- every individual is accused when evidence is question and verdict is being determined
- given a formal sheet of paper when arrested by police - states capture day. and court charge
- right to a trail - both sides get to present evidence - the prosecution is the state and the police, the defence can present evidence as well (if they kind an alibi, that’s the defence evidence that’s their right)
- CASE - RE PINOCHET - cross examination - we must cross examination courts
- to show quality of the evidence
what is rule of law
everyone is answerable to the law and no one is above the law e.g. police powers are controlled
what does it mean by arbitrary power is eliminated?
If the government attempts to pass a law that is beyond its constitutional powers (Rules of Government) the Governor General and the High Court of Australia are empowered to intervene.
PSA: the Federal Government CAN ONLY make laws on marriage,
what is the separation of powers?
Ensures RULE OF LAW (interdependent judiciary)
define anarchy
a state of lawlessness (where law enforcement agencies do not operate effectively)
- May break out during a revolution or a natural disaster
- Why? – enforcement agencies no longer exist or are unable to enforce the laws
- Violence and widespread looting (if people loot shops or houses, they steal things from them, e.g. during a war) are two early indicators that a society or group is on the verge of anarchy.
how might a society maintain order?
- Recognition of evolving values and ethics
- Establishment of patterns of conduct
- Provision of dispute settlements e.g., Courts
- People obey laws due to the consequences and punishments. Sanctions act as a deterrent for others in society.
- Protests, natural disasters can occur
what is piracy?
Because of society is crumbling, because of anarchy, there is piracy. There is no employment. The government is trying to spend resources on civil wars in employment and commercial industry = no jobs.
what is tyranny?
The rule by a single leader holding absolute power in a state.
what is a tyrant? with an example
A tyrant is a single leader who has unlimited and arbitrary power over the people in a country or state.
- Does not allow elections for voting.
- Never be unvoted
example Kim Jong un
Australia has two types of law. what are they?
- common law
- statute law
both have originated from English law
define common law
laws made by judges based on precedent.
the Australian political system - British and America
define statute law
laws made by parliament
constitution
government
international law
united nations
precedent
achieves equality (justice)
define equity
Developed after common law precedent. The court of chancery dealt with unique cases (achieve fairness).
define equity law
fairness. The body of law that supplements the common law and corrects injustices by judging each case on its merits and applying principles of fairness.
what is the role of the chancellor?
- Not basing their judgements on precedent and form
- They were influenced by Christian principles.
- This body of law, which developed to deal with the injustices that had crept ‘into the common law’ and was set up to hear these petitions became known as equity.
define obiter dicta
personal opinion, the judges opinion
define ratio decidendi
legal reason
what is precedent
judgement made by a court that establishes ‘a point of law’
Judge is bound by the ratio decidendi . what is the reason for the judicial decision
Judges in a higher court may override the precedent (e.g. if the case is appealed) - ensures equality
Old cases retain an authority, which allow their decisions to be used as the basis for decisions in newer cases
define stare decisis
the decision stands. a judge who follows precedent is attempting to resolve a legal issue in a certain way because a similar issue was resolved in this way in the past
what are the two rules of precedent?
- binding precedent
- persuasive precedent
what are 5 points of binding precedent with an example
- Precedent is ‘binding’ on a court if the precedent was made by a superior court that is higher in the hierarchy or courts
- Lower courts are bound to follow decisions of superior courts, regardless of whether the judge believes a decision of the higher court is correct
- Must be followed if the precedent is relevant and the circumstances of the case are sufficiently similar
- All state and federal courts in Australia are bound by the decision of the high court of Australia
- Only the radio decidendi of the superior court is binding
- E.g. The NSW Local Court and district court must follow the decisions of the supreme court
what are 5 points of persuasive precedent with an example
- A precedent is ‘persuasive’ if it was established by a superior court that is not higher in the hierarchy of courts
- The precedent should be seriously considered, but is not required to be followed
- Superior courts do not have to follow decisions made in the lower courts
- They may use them to help make a decision
- May also include orbiter dicta of a judge in a higher court
- E.g. A precedent established by the supreme court of New South Wales is persuasive but not binding on the supreme court of Victoria, since these courts are not the same hierarchy and are of equal authority
how will a judge affect the precedent?
a court is more likely to take into account a precedent set by eminent and influential judge
how will the court affect the precedent?
the higher the court, the more persuasive the precedent will be
what are two advantages of using the doctrine of precedent in the legal system
- Prevent bias or prejudice from judges
- Promotes judicial restraint
Limits a judge’s ability to be too creative when making a decision
what are two disadvantages of using the doctrine of precedent in the legal system
- Inflexible nature of the binding precedent
- Lower courts in the hierarchy are bound by existing precedents if they cannot distinguish material facts
Judgements from these previous cases may be outdated or not taken into consideration, though the lower court is still bound to follow it
define obiter dicta
comments from a judge in a case that are not directly relevant to the case; not legally binding
when does precedent not have to be followed?
- When a higher court upholds an appeal against a lower court’s decision, the decision of the lower court is reversed
- Court may refuse to follow a decision of another court that is at a lower or equal level in the hierarchy
define refusal
overruling the decision of the lower court
avoiding the use of precedent: distinguishing the case
judge ay decide that the facts of a current case are different to a previous case that precedent does not have to be followed
avoiding the use of precedent: reversing a judgement
when a matter is appealed to a higher court, there is a possibility that the appeal will be up held. precedent set by the lower court will be reversed
avoiding the use of precedent: overruling a decision with an example
Similar to reversing a decision, but involves two separate cases
E.g. a person is found guilty of an offence in a lower court. Another person is tried for a similar offence with similar facts in a higher court. If the higher court decides the ruling of the lower court was wrong, may overturn the decision and therefore the lower court’s precedent
avoiding the use of precedent: disapproving a decision
Case from another court system may be referred to a judge for consideration
Judge may refuse to consider the case because it comes from another jurisdiction
define adversarial system of trial
A system of resolving legal conflicts, used in common law countries which relies on the skill of representatives for each side (e.g., defence and prosecution lawyers) who present their cases to an impartial decision-maker.
define adversarial
A system of resolving legal conflicts – used in common law countries, that relies on the skill of representatives for each side who present their cases.
- Adversary means opponent.
- 2 sides – offender + prosecutor.
- In theory, the defendant does not have to prove anything as they are assumed innocent until proven guilty.
- Impartial judge or jury will listen to evidence presented by both parties.
- Jury – 12 people who are tasked with hearing evidence presented and returning a verdict of guilty or not guilty.
- In civil cases (private), plaintiff is the victim.
define inquisitorial
A legal system where the court or part of the court is actively involved in conducting the trial and determining the questions to ask. Used primarily in countries where they have civil legal systems.
- Judges will conduct an inquiry into the truth of what occurred.
- Judges can decide when witnesses are called and can call for outside testimony, even if it hasn’t been requested by either side.
- No cross examination – judge does it.
disadvantages of adversary systems
- Biggest Flaw: Despite the rigorous testing of evidence, cases are often won by the best and most persuasive argument rather than on the evidence
- Civil cases: mediation should be used in family law matters to reduce time, costs and animosity between parties in dispute
- Criminal law: the way witnesses, such as children and victims of sexual assault, are cross examined is to reduce the trauma of the trial process
court hierarch
look over one note
define statute law
laws made by parliament. Also known as ‘legislation’ and ‘Acts of Parliament’. These can override common law precedents.
what are the 3 areas of statute law?
- delegated legislation
- role and structure of parliament
- legislative process
statute law always prevail over common law. what does this mean?
- Any parliament (state, territory, and federal governments) have the power to make statute law.
- Australian Constitution sets out the powers of state and federal parliaments with respect to making law.
- Courts work with society and the cases presented to them
what are the features of a democracy
- Population elects who they want to represent the country
- Transparency
- Free elections -
- Multi-party
- Freedom of movement, and basic human rights
- Government is not run by monarchs or family; it is run by the people (anyone has the right to become politics)
who is the parliament?
A body of elected representatives from members of society
what is the role of the parliament?
- Debates proposed legislation
- Passes, amends, rejects legislation
- Delegates legislative authority to other bodies
define bicameral
- two houses
what is a double dissolution
When the Upper and Lower House fail to agree on passing legislation TWICE, Section 57 of the Constitution grants a special power to the Governor General (by request of the Prime Minister) to dissolve both Houses and call a new election.
who is the Governor General
- A representative of the Queen created by the Constitution.
- The appointment has no set time frame, but usually lasts 5 years.
- The Australia Act 1886 diminished the role of the Queen. Today, the main role of the Queen is to appoint the Governor General
- Gives the Queens assent (approval) to laws.
- The Governor General can exercise their “Reserve Powers,” and choose not to follow when:
- A hung parliament occurs the GG can appoint a new Prime Minister
- Dismiss the Prime Minister who has lost the public’s confidence, or has acted unlawfully
what is the federal executive council?
- Is made up of the GG, PM, and Cabinet Ministers.
- The GG main role is to ensure the FEC acts lawfully within the Constitution
what is a hung parliament?
A hung parliament occurs when two parties have the same number of seats in the lower house after an election. No one can form government on its own, and minor parties or independents will have to side with one or the other to create a government.