Evidence: Real and Documentary Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

A writing may be authenticated by evidence _________.

A
  1. Evidence that the party against whom the writing is offered has acted upon the writing as authentic.
  2. Evidence that the party against whom the writing is offered has either admitted its authenticity or acted upon the writing.
  3. Circumstantial evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Evidence Requirement for Authentication of Real Evidence

A

To support a finding that the matter is what its proponent claims it is.

**not required to establish its genuineness by a preponderance of the evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Original Evidence

A

Real evidence that has some connection with the transaction that is in question at the trial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Real Evidence Types

A
  1. Original
  2. Circumstantial
  3. Demonstrative
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Circumstantial Evidence

A

Facts about the object are proved as a basis for an inference that other facts are true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Demonstrative Evidence

A

Real evidence that is prepared, such as sketches or models to be shown to the trier of fact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Authentication of Evidence

A

An object must first be identified as being what the proponent claims it to be.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Common Authentication of Real Evidence

A

Recognition testimony

By establishing a chain of custody

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Contents of voluminous writings

A

May be presented in the form of a summary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When is Secondary evidence of a writing permitted?

A

Only after it has been shown that the original is unavailable for some reason other than the serious misconduct of the proponent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Three Questions of Preliminary Fact for the Jury

A
  1. Whether the original ever existed;
  2. Whether the writing, recording, or photograph produced at trial is an original;
    AND
  3. Whether the evidence offered correctly reflects the contents of the original.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Oral Statements that are to be introduced at trial must be authenticated IF

A

The ID of the speaker is important.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Under the ________, if an agreement is reduced to writing with the intent that it embody the full and final expression of the bargain, that writing is the agreement and constitutes the only evidence of it.

A

Parol Evidence Rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Essence of the Parol Evidence Rule

A

If an agreement is reduced to writing with the intent that it embody the full and final expression of the bargain, that writing is the agreement and hence constitutes the only evidence of it.

All prior or contemporaneous negotiations or agreements are merged into the written agreement.

Not admissible to add to, detract from, or alter the agreement as written.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Essence of the Best Evidence Rule

A

In proving the terms of a writing (recording, photo, xray), where the terms are material, the original writing must be produced.

Secondary evidence of the writing is permitted only after it has been shown that the original is unavailable for some reason other than the serious misconduct of the proponent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What if the condition of the object is significant?

A

The condition must be shown to be substantially the same at trial.

17
Q

What if the evidence is of a type that is likely to be confused or can be easily tampered with?

A

The proponent of the object must show that it has been held in a substantially unbroken chain of possession but does not need to negate all possibilities of substitution or tampering.

18
Q

What falls within the best evidence rule?

A

Only to negotiations or agreements made prior to, or at the time of, the execution of the written contract.

Essential repositories of the facts recorded

 - Written contracts
 - Deeds
 - Wills 
 - Judgments
 - Divorce
  • *Not Birth, Marriage, and Death
  • *Not apply to Subsequent modifications of the written contract.
19
Q

Under the best evidence rule an “original” means not only the writing or recording itself, but also a _________ intended by the person executing it to have the same effect as an original.

A

Counterpart

20
Q

What is an “original” writing?

A

The writing or recording itself or any counterpart intended by the person executing it to have the same effect as an original.

21
Q

What is a “duplicate?”

A

An exact copy of an original.

Admissible the same as originals in federal courts.

22
Q

What are the exceptions to admissibility of a duplicate?

A
  1. A genuine question is raised about the original’s authenticity;
    OR
  2. Under the circumstances, it would be unfair to admit the duplicate in place of the original.
23
Q

If helpful, in what cases may the jury review the scene?

A

Civil and Criminal

24
Q

When are negotiations or agreements are inadmissible to vary the terms of the writing?

A

If they are made prior to or contemporaneous with the writing.

25
Q

A document that is _______ does not require extrinsic evidence of authenticity as a condition to admissibility.

A

Self-authenticating

26
Q

The best evidence rule does not apply where _________.

A

The fact to be proved has an existence independent of a writing.

27
Q

For the most part, the Best Evidence Rule applies to two classes of situations.

A
  1. Where the writing is legally operative or dispositive instrument such as a contract, deEd, will, or divorce decree;
    OR
  2. Where the knowledge of a witness concerning a fact results from having read it in the document.