Clinical Decision Making Flashcards

1
Q

What is the first step in interviewing?

A

Collecting information:
- current swallowing/oral intake issue?
- description of problem
- do any strategies help?
- current medication?
- how is this different to the past?
- what is the impact on the individual?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the second step in interviewing?

A

Decision making:
- formulating hypotheses and make decision re. plan
- severity
- possible cause
- need for information and
assessments?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What would you expect a) to observe and b) the functionality of a classification of NO dysphagia?

A

(Considering age appropriateness), you would see:
- full labial seal
- forms a cohesive bolus
- masticates food successfully and with ease
- efficient lingual search for loose food particles
- prompt swallow reflex initiation (1 sec)
- adequate/full laryngeal excursion on palpation

Functionality:
- managing regular diet and fluids

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What would you expect a) to observe and b) the functionality of a classification of mild dysphagia?

A

May see:
- occasional difficulty forming seal
- occasional issues with bolus formation
- able to break down all textures but some effort required
- mild lingual weakness
- pharyngeal delay of ~1-3 seconds following propulsion from oral cavity
- slightly reduced or delayed laryngeal excursion

Functionality:
- may need 1 level fluid or 1 level diet modification, or managing thin fluids with a strategy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What would you expect a) to observe and b) the functionality of a classification of moderate dysphagia?

A

May see:
- reduced ability to form lip seal -> consistent anterior spill
- coughing on some consistencies
- some issues with bolus formation, some oral residue
- masticates solids with difficulty (hard and chewy textures problematic)
- some difficulty with lingual search
- pharyngeal swallow delay of ~3-6 secs
- incomplete or delayed laryngeal excursion
- at risk for airway compromise

Functionality:
- will often need some degree of fluid and food modification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What would you expect a) to observe and b) the functionality of a classification of severe dysphagia?

A

May see:
- impaired labial closure, inability to remove food/fluid from spoon, consistent anterior leakage
- unable to masticate solids
- poor bolus formation, consistent oral residue
- prominent oral pooling and inability to clear, premature spill to pharynx because of poor lingual control)
- pharyngeal swallow delay 6-10 secs
- laryngeal excursion delayed or incomplete
- significant risk of airway compromise

Functionality:
- managing quite modified fluids and foods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What would you expect a) to observe and b) the functionality of a classification of profound dysphagia?

A

May see:
- no labial seal, inability to maintain food orally
- little to no attempt at mastication
- prominent oral pooling
- inability to form a bolus
- absent swallow or >10 sec to generate pharyngeal swallow
- laryngeal excursion marginal to non-existent
- extreme risk for airway compromise

Functionality:
- unable to eat orally or only having small oral trials (1-2 teaspoons) with SP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain the continuum of complete oral intake, to nil by mouth

A

Complete oral intake
->
Oral + non-oral: combine partial intake with supplementation
->
Nil by mouth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the top variables most frequently considered by clinicians when recommending oral/non-oral intake?

A
  • amount of aspiration (i.e. frequency)
  • secretion management
  • patient diagnosis; severity of condition; prognosis
  • history of pneumonia; respiratory status; cough
  • alertness; ability to complete compensatory postures
  • patient wishes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the two main forms of non-oral supplementation to ensure patients are receiving appropriate nutrition?

A

Enteral feeding (via normal gastric system)
- nasogastric/orogastric
- Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastronomy (PEG)

Parenteral nutrition (not via normal gastric system, uses blood system)
- Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPM)
- IV line (fluids only - hydration)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain what nasogastric feeding is, including some advantages and disadvantages

A

Tube feeding via nose to stomach; provided continuously or in ‘bolus’ feeds

Advantages:
- allows temporary delivery of non-oral nutrition during swallow recovery/health recovery (temporary, 6-8 weeks)
- no surgery required
- easy to insert

Disadvantages:
- physical presence in the nose, pharynx and oesophagus
- potential for reflux - can lead to aspiration
- patient can take out easily
- uncomfortable for patient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are nasojejunal/orojejunal tubes?

A
  • tubes via oral or nasal and into jejunum - bypassing stomach
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is jejunostomy?

A
  • where the tube is placed below the stomach into the jejunum
  • placed to reduce the risk of reflux
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is gastronomy? Include disadvantages

A
  • general surgical procedure performed under general anaesthetic
  • most typically inserted percutaneously
  • generally considered a long term solution to severe swallowing disorder as it removes the risk of nasal and pharyngeal irritation
  • continuous or bolus feeds

Disadvantages:
- stoma site can leak, become sore or infected
- not necessarily permanent - i.e. reversible if swallow improves
- issues of reflux can be problematic for some patients

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is Total Parenteral Nutrition?

A

= non-enteric
Parenteral nutrition - by way of solution infused directly into the blood stream
- for nutrition depleted patients who can’t take nutritional needs via enteral means (typically GI tract is non-functional)
- infused into a central/main vein
- very expensive
- typically only used for critically ill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the process from progressing from non-oral to oral feeding?

A

As swallow/medical state improves, the need for non-oral feeding decreases:
- commence small oral trials with full non-oral supplementation
- increase size and amounts of oral trials - discuss with dietitian to start to change bolus feeds, and/or reduced amounts of non-oral feeds to increase appetite for oral intake
- monitor oral intake - once sufficient, dietitian, medical and SP determine non-oral can be removed

17
Q

When a patient is SAFE for oral intake, what are some considerations to make?

A
  • amount of intake
    • full diet?
    • size of portions
  • nature of intake
    • timing
    • independent or supervised?
    • positioning
    • any compensatory strategies
  • medications
    • can they swallow them?
    • method of administration
  • mouth care
    - is oral residue an issue? cleaning
    before/after meals required?
  • circuit breakers?
    - alerting nursing staff when to
    cease oral trials
    - monitoring for any relevant
    changes in medical
    condition/chest health
  • WHEN to review patient for management of modified diet
    • if they’re fluctuating
    • if recovering
    • going in for more surgeries
      = more/less monitoring, review; daily? in a week? in a month?
18
Q

Discuss compliance as a patient consideration

A
  • can be an issue
  • some patients don’t like modified fluids/foods
  • family/carers don’t understand why it’s necessary
    . . . reduced or incorrect oral intake - leads to issues of aspiration, as well as for hydration and nutrition
  • patients don’t follow through with therapy exercises . . . . delays to rehab
19
Q

Discuss free water protocol as a management option?

A
  • concept of allowing specific patient groups on modified fluid diets to have small sips of water under certain strict conditions
20
Q

What are the rules of the free water protocol?

A
  • only water
  • only small sips
  • only between meals
  • only when mouth is clean
  • not with any food intake
21
Q

What is the rationale for the free water protocol?

A
  • water is an inert substance (low pneumonia risk)
    • may be useful to maintain hydration
  • patients and family must be well educated and aware of risks
  • comfort/pleasure of patient
22
Q

Contrast risk and comfort feeding across the dimensions of patient population, aim, and clinical indicator

A

Patient population:
(risk) - patients receive active medical management
(comfort) - patients with life limiting condition, nearing end of life for comfort cares

Aim:
(risk) - to support feeding decisions in line with patient autonomy and informed decision making
(comfort) - to improve and/or maintain oral intake for quality of life and comfort

Clinical indicator:
(risk) - patient reporting or requesting non-compliance with speech pathology recommendations
(comfort) - patient with palliative conditions wishing to eat and rink for comfort and enjoyment

23
Q

What factors might suggest high urgency when prioritising patients?

A
  • new referrals with underlying respiratory problem or aspiration risk
  • new acute stroke or
  • new acute paediatric feeding/swallowing referral
  • client classified nil by mouth without enteral or intravenous fluid support
  • infants with failure to thrive or weight loss
  • complex presentation with multiple co-morbidities
  • concern for ability to manage current diet/fluids due to medical fluctuation
  • impact on administration of oral medications
  • dysphagia management impacting on discharge planning
24
Q

What factors might suggest moderate urgency when prioritising patients?

A
  • dysphagia management not impacting respiratory function
  • assessment of client with existing enteral or intravenous fluid support
  • review assessments for alteration to clients already managing a fluid/diet texture
25
Q

What factors might suggest low urgency when prioritising patients?

A
  • client tolerating current diet/fluids - monitoring of status
  • stable chronic dysphagia