EBM Intro Flashcards

1
Q

Who established the core principles of EBM?

A

Dr David Sackett

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is EBM?

A

the integration of best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why do we need EBM?

A

what we learn in school will not last forever
-new therapies
-new indications
-new formulations
-new “experts”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the 5 steps of EBM?

A

ask (develop your question)
acquire (find the best evidence)
appraise (critically evaluate the evidence for validity and usefulness)
apply (use results in your practice)
assess (evaluate your performance)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the components of the research question (step 1: ask)?

A

PICO
population
intervention
comparison
outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are some tools for literature searching (step 2: acquire)?

A

Medline
PubMed
Cochrane Database (systematic reviews)
Google Scholar (be careful)
Google (be careful)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Differentiate between descriptive and analytic study designs.

A

descriptive: snapshot in time, no intervention
-survey (cross-sectional)
-qualitative
analytic: intervention, following throughout time
-experimental: randomized (parallel or crossover), non-randomized
-observational: cohort, cross-sectional, case-control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does it mean to appraise (step 3)?

A

the process of carefully and systematically examining research to judge its validity, results, and relevance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why is critical appraisal important?

A

its no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published
much of the scientific literature may be untrue
many studies have small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and conflicts of interest
study results are not always: valid, safe, and useful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

True or false: the number of journals indexed on PubMed has been declining

A

false
the number of journals has been increasing fast

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Differentiate between internal validity and external validity.

A

internal validity:
-are the results due to the intervention or something else?
external validity:
-are the results applicable (generalizable) to other populations, settings, and time?
-depends on study population and setting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the 3 major threats to internal validity?

A

chance
confounding
bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is chance?

A

random error
-inherent in all measurements
-the more there is, the less precise the results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is bias?

A

any systematic error in a study that results in an incorrect estimate of the association between the intervention or exposure and the outcome
problems with the way a study was designed, conducted, or analyzed that leads to incorrect results or conclusions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is confounding?

A

a confusion of effects
-factor(s) other than the intervention or exposure influences the observed outcome
-the factor must be linked to the exposure and the outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the issue with external validity and drug studies?

A

related to the inclusion/exclusion criteria
-who should use the drug?
-who is the drug approved for?

17
Q

Which research design sits at the top of the hierarchy for filtered information? What about unfiltered information?

A

systematic reviews
-review of RCTs for everything in that topic
randomized controlled trials