Obedience (Social Influence) Flashcards

1
Q

Obedience

A

A type of social influence which causes a person to act in response to an order given by another person. The person who gives the order is usually a figure of authority who has the power to punish when obedient behaviour is not forthcoming.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Method 1 (Milgram 1963 Obedience to authority)

A

Laboratory experiments to test factors thought to affect obedience. Tested wether people would obey orders to shock someone in a separate room.
The payment they received was not sensitive to wether or not they proceeded with the experiment.
Each participant was introduced to a confederate acting like a participant.
They drew lots to see who would act as teacher and learner but this was fixed so that the participant would always be the teacher.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Method 2 (Milgram 1963 Obedience to authority)

A

The participant sees the confederate being strapped to a chair and connected to a shock generator. It didn’t really give electric shocks but the participants thought it was real.
The participants taught the learner word-pairs over an intercom. When the learner answered incorrectly, the participant had to administer an increasing level of shock.
After the 300V shock, the learner pounded on the wall and gave no further response. Participants were told to continue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Results + Conclusion (Milgram 1963 Obedience to authority)

A

Results:
65% administered 450V and none stopped before administering 300V.
Most participants showed obvious signs of stress like sweating, groaning and trembling.

Conclusion: Ordinary people will obey orders to hurt someone else even if it means acting against their conscience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Situational variables in Milgram’s studies (Location and Uniform)

A

-Location: originally done in Yale university (quite prestigious)
was changed to a run down office down town. obedience decrease

-Uniform: the researchers originally wore a grey lab coat. obedience dropped to 20% when they were not dressed like a scientist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Situational variables in Milgram’s studies (Proximity)

A

-Proximity: When the teacher and learner were in the same room, participants going to max voltage dropped from 65% in the baseline study to 40%.

touch proximity, where teachers had to force the learner’s hand onto an electroshock plate, obedience dropped to 30%

remote proximity, when teachers were being instructed by researchers by telephone the obedience rate dropped to 20.5%. participants in this condition would pretend to give shocks or give weaker shocks than they’d been told to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Agentic state

A

a mental state where we feel no personal responsibility for our behaviour because we believe ourselves to be acting for an authority figure, for example, as their agent. This frees us from the demands of our consciences and allows us to obey even a destructive authority figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Legitimacy of authority

A

an explanation for obedience which suggests that we are more likely to obey people who we perceive to have authority over us. This authority is justified by the individual’s position of power within a social hierarchy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Autonomous state

A

means to be free or independent. Free to behave in accordance to their own principles and therefore feels a sense of responsibility for their own actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

agentic shift

A

a shift from a state of autonomy to the agentic state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Binding factors in Milgram’s experiment

A

reluctance to disrupt the experiment- obligation
pressure of the surroundings- legitimate authority
-insistence of the authority figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

who might be a legitimate authority?

A

-somebody that is seen to be in a position of social control
-their power stems from their perceived opinion in the social situation
There is a shared expectation among people that there will be a leader
participants in Milgram’s experiment entered the laboratory expecting somebody to be in charge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Hofling 1966

A

Nurses received a phone call from an unknown doctor while they were alone. They were instructed to prescribe 20mg of an unknown drug.

21 out of 22 nurses obeyed the order.

We can conclude that, with no other influences, we are likely to obey authority figures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rank and Jacobson 1977

A

Nurses were given an order, from a doctor they knew, over the phone while other nurses were present. They were told to prescribe triple the regular dose of valium, a drug which they knew of which is known to be dangerous in high doses.

Only 2 out of 18 Nurses prescribed the drug, showing that people are less likely to obey authority figures when there is another influence which they agree with. The surrounding nurses would have expressed concern.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Bickman 1974

A

Members of the public were asked by an experimenter to do something. Tested the ecological validity of Milgram’s work.
When the experimenter wore no uniform, fewer people obeyed
When the experimenter wore a milkman uniform, more obeyed than when there was no uniform
when they wore a guard’s uniform, the most people obeyed.

People are more likely to obey who they perceive as an authority figure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

My Lai Massacre (evidence for obedience)

A

-American soldiers in Vietnam killed 500 villagers
-Lt William Calley ordered them to do this
-he accepted no guilt and blamed it on his commanding officer

17
Q

Self image and obedience

A

Self image is the view of ourselves that we personally hold.
-once individuals move in to the agentic state worrying about their own image is no longer as relevant
-they see the action as no longer being their responsibility or reflections of their own self image
links to my lai massacre

18
Q

Blass and Schmitt 2001

A

-students who were shown a video of Milgram’s experiment, blamed the experimenter rather than teacher
-responsibility belongs to the legitimate authority
-the authority was an expert scientist

19
Q

Evidence suggesting that legitimate authorities are not responsible for the actions of their agents

A

-milgram claimed people shift between autonomous and agentic state, however, doctors in the concentration camps in Auschwitz carried out vile and lethal experiments on victims
-carrying out acts of evil over extended period of time can change the way people think and feel
-Mandel (1998): German Reserve Police Battalion 101 had no direct orders

20
Q

Kilman and Mann’s 1974 replication of Milgram’s study

A

Involved cultural differences:
-Australia: 16%
-Mantell: (1971) The potential for violence in Germany: 85%
In some cultures authority is more likely to be accepted as legitimate and entitled to demand obedience

21
Q

Obedience in the cockpit

A

-evidence to support redefining the situation and legitimate authority
-review of the accidents- copilot did not want to question authority of the lead pilot
-air asiana crash 2013 “didn’t want to question captains orders”

22
Q

Loss of personal control

A

-agentic shift is not only confined to obedience
-reduction in personal control- evidence of bystander apathy
-this was present in Zimbardo’s study

23
Q

Dispositional Factors

A

explanation of individual behaviour caused by internal characteristics that reside within the individual’s personality(e.g. an authoritarian personality)

24
Q

Situational Factors

A

explanations that focus on the influence that stem from the environment in which that individual is found

25
Q

Authoritarian personality

A

A collection of traits/dispositions developed from strict, rigid parenting, e.g. conformist,conventional,dogmatic and unyielding
obedient and servile towards people perceived to be of higher authority

26
Q

Findings of the Fascist scale

A

-People who scored high on the scale (authoritarian) identified with ‘strong’ people and were contemptuous of ‘the weak’
-they were conscious of their own and others’ status, blindly respecting people with power
-Authoritarian people had a cognitive style, easily defining categories of people and were driven by stereotypes and prejudice
-positive correlation between authoritarianism and prejudice

27
Q

Method (Adorno’s 1950 study of the authoritarian personality)

A

Adorno proposed that over-strict parenting results in a child being socialised to obey authority unquestioningly. Researchers tried to find out if there are characteristics of individuals which could explain the uprising of the Nazis and the holocaust.

The experiment asked 2000 middle class American males to complete the F scale

28
Q

Results (Adorno’s 1950 study of the authoritarian personality)

A

Adorno proposed that those who scored higher on the F scale were more likely to have strict parents

Adorno identified a number of personality traits that have resulted from over-strict parenting as the authoritarian personality.

29
Q

Conclusion (Adorno’s 1950 study of the authoritarian personality)

A

The authoritarian personality in a dispositional explanation for obedience, due to over-harsh and strict parenting

30
Q

Evaluation (Adorno’s 1950 study of the authoritarian personality)

A

Elms and Milgram fond that participants who scored higher on the F scale had been willing to administer the bigger shocks in Milgram’s experiment.

As this study tested individual personality types, it does not explain why whole societies became obedient.