Lecture 9 - Basis of Memory Flashcards

1
Q

Who was Hermann Ebbinghaus?

A

Herman Hebbinghaus (late 1800s) was one of the first experimental psychologists who studied memory.
An example of the studies he did was looking at how well people were able to memorize nonsense trigrams, e.g. teg, raz, fip.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What were some of the key findings from Ebbinghaus’s work?

A

Some of the findings from Ebbinghaus’s work are still relevant and studied today.
Some of these include that repetition is more effective when it is spaced out over time than when they all occur at the same time.
List length effects: worse memiry when long lists are studied than shorter lists.
The Forgetting Curve: the shape of how memory declines over time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is The Forgetting Curve and who first discovered and proposed this?

A

The forgetting curve describes the decline in memory over time.
It takes the shape of steep decrease followed by a lessening curve.
Ebbinghaus first publicised this curve.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a “law”?

A

Theories and laws are not the same. Laws describe an invariance or regularity in data, whereas a Theory is an attempt to explain a phenomenon or law.
An example of a law in psychology is the Law of Practice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the Laws of Memory discussed in this lecture?

A

The Law of Recency.
The Law of Primacy.
The Law of Repetition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the Law of Recency?

A

The Law of Recency finds that recent information is almost always remembered better than older information. The recency function, however, is is non-linear, with older information decaying at a slower rate than newer information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the Law of Primacy?

A

The Law of Primacy finds that we remember items at the start of sequences better than other items in the sequence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Looking at the Law of Primacy, what did Murdoch and Carey (1972) find?

A

Murdoch and Carey found that in a sequence of items when they changed the modality of information (from auditory to visual and vice versa) the items at the beginning of the new modality were remembered better than items prior to them in the other modality. I.e. primacy effects were seen at each change in modality.
This phenomenon can also be seen when the background in a sequence is changed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the Law of Repetition?

A

The Law of Repetition states that memories improve with repetition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

In regards to The Law of Repetition, what is the Peterson’s Paradox (1972)?

A

The Peterson’s paradox refers to the phenomenon that massed repetition yield slightly better performance after a short delay than spaced repetition, however, after a longer delay, spaced repetitions engender much better performance than massed repetition,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does testing, over repeat studying, improve memory in regards to the Law of Repetition?

A

Testing improves memory much better than re-learning, in the long term at least.
After a short delay re-learning yields better memory results, however, after a longer delay, testing yields better memory performance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the two reasons we forget?

A

When we forget something it is either due to an encoding failure or a retrieval failure.
I.e. we either never successfully learned/encoded a memory in the first place.
Or you initially learned some information and encoded a memory, but are now having difficulty retrieving that information/memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are some of the Theories of Retrieval Failure we discussed in the lecture?

A

Decay Theory.
Interference Theory.
Consolidation Theory.
Inhibition Theory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is Decay Theory?
Hint: it is a theory of memory retrieval failure.

A

Decay Theory simply states that memories fade over time, especially if they are not repeatedly accessed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In regards to Decay Theory, what is the Brown-Peterson paradigm?

A

The Brown-Peterson paradigm finds that there is a predictable loss of recently learned trigram over time (subjects count backwards from seven to prevent rehearsal), with almost no memory of the trigram after about 20 seconds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is Interference Theory?

A

Interference Theory states that we forget memories over time because there is increasing competition between what we are trying to remember as we accumulate more information and memories, i.e. there is infcreasing amounts of mental activity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What was proposed by John McGeogh in 1932 that challenged The Decay theory of memory retrieval failure?

A

McGeogh claimed that Decay Theory was conceptually flawed because it states a pattern of WHAT happens to memories over time as opposed to WHY this happens.
He then proposed the Interference Theory of memory retrieval failure.
When we learn with associate things together. The more associations we have with a given cue, the more difficulty we have with remembering thins, e.g. our memory was a lot poorer during lockdown as we had many more associations with the one cue - home - which made it difficult to remember the associations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are proactive and retroactive interference?

A

Proactive interference occurs when old associations inhibit the retrieval of newer associations.
Retroactive interference occurs when newer associations prevent the retrieval of older associations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are the AB-CD and AB-AC paradigms in regards to memory and how do these paradigms support the Interference Theory and not The Decay Theory ?

A

The AB-CD paradigm is when participants are present with two lists. On each list there are paired objects, but there are no overlapping pairs, e.g dog-king is on list one, and car-bottle is on list two. The participants are then required to do a memory test where one of the objects in a pair is presented and they need to retrieve the associated object.
The AB-AC paradigm is similar, however, there are overlapping objects between lists, but with different associates. e.g dog-king is on list one and dog-bottle is on list two.
What we find in these tasks is that people have more difficulty correctly retrieving the correct associate in AB-AC paradigms than in AB-CD paradigms.
Interference Theory says that this is the case because there is now increased interence/competition between cues and associations. Decay Theory on the other hand cannnot explain explain this phenomenon.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

In 1957 Underwood did a re-analysis of the Brown-Peterson results looking at it from the lens of Interference Theory.

A

What Underwood found was that there was huge variation in how much material was forgotten over time, with the number of previous experimental trials being a predictor of forgetting.
This is interpreted under The Inference Theory that with more experimental trials there is more interference and proactive interfence that decreasing ability to retrieve memories.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the Release from Proactive Interference phenomenon and what was one of the seminal studies looking at this by Wickens, Born and Allen (1963)?

A

The Release from Proactive Interference phenomenon is seen when memory retrieval improves when the stimuli type changes. It is similar to the primacy effect.
Wickens, Born and Allen (1963) looked at this by doing a memory test similar to the Brown-Peterson tasks, but this time change stimuli from digits to numbers between trials. What they found was that when the stimuli changed memory improved and showed minimal effects of interference on memory retrieval.
Interference Theory explains these results by saying that with the new stimuli type having less interference from prior associations compared to the old stimuli. Theory of Decay does not explain these results.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is Consolidation Theory?

A

Consolidation Theory states that if a memory is consolidated then it wont be forgotten, however, if not then it will be. It is based on this idea that when we learn or experience something these memories go through a period of perseveration where the memory is vulnerable to interference and forgetting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What are the three predictions made by Consolidation Theory?

A
  1. Protecting memories during perseveration should enhance consolidation and prevent forgetting - this is seen in practice. When learning is followed by a period of mental inactivity the memory has more time and less interference to consolidate, e.g. participants that sleep after learning exhibit improved memory performance.
  2. Interrupted perseveration should prevent consolidation and prevent memories from being stored - this is seen in practice with observations of those with retrograde amnesia, such as H.M as well as in rat studies where electroconvulsive shocks to the hippocampas interfers with memory when does soon after learning, but not after 1 hour, i.e. after the memory has been consolidated. This is also seen when the hippocampus is removed.
  3. If the consolidation is prevented, the memory is not stored and remembering should be impossible - in practice this is actually not seen. Although when interference occurs during perseveration short term memory appears to be affected (with rats) after a longer period of time, say 72 hours as opposed to 1 hour, there is some memory there. This is also seen in the phenomenon of spontaneous recovery during opporant conditioning.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is one of the predictions made by Consolidation Theory that is not wholly supported in practice?

A

Consolidation Theory predicts that if consolidation is prevvented then the memory won’t be store and cannot be retrieved. However, this is not actually the case. Work with rats has found that preventing consolidation results in short-term memory inhibition, but after a while the memory comes back.

25
Q

What was found in a study done by Bahrick et al that looked at memory of learned foreign languages?

A

It was found that there was a steep decrease in memory of a learned foreign language over 3 years, but then from 3-50 years there was not much more decrease in knowledge of this language.

26
Q

What is one of the hybrid theories of memory retrieval failure?

A

A hybrid theory of Consolidation and Interference Theories, where consolidation is thought to protect older memories from interference.

27
Q

What is the proposed neural pathway of consolidation?

A

It is thought that the consolidation of memories occurs as memories are exported from the hippocampus to the cerebral cortex.

28
Q

Does the forgetting function/curve reflect a power function or exponential function?

A

The forgetting curve reflects a power function, i.e. the amount we forget decreases with time.

29
Q

What is a paired-associate cued recall experiment?

A

Paired-associated cued recall experiments are the AB-CD, AB-AC tasks used to test memory.

30
Q

In free recall tasks, what are some the effects we see for performance and serial position?
(from tutorial)

A

We tend to see:
Primacy effects
Recency effects (where the most recent information is remembered better).

31
Q

When are recency effects normally seen and why in our tutorial did we not see a recency effect?
Hint: filled delay
(from tutorial)

A

Recency effects tend to be seen if there is no delay between when a participant learns and when they are tested. However, when there is a filled delay (i.e. participants are required to do a mental activity such as counting backwards from 100) then recency effects do not tend to me seen as it is thought that the filled delay clears short term memory.

32
Q

Why are filled delays used in some tasks and what effect do filled delays have onmemory?
(from tutorial)

A

Filled delays are found clear short-term memory and reduce likelihood of seeing recency effects.

33
Q

What are the differences seen in data re massed and spaced repetition in turns of memory performance?
What effects do filled delays have on these effects?
(from tutorial)

A

Massed repetitions out-perform repeated repetitions when there is no filled-delay.

34
Q

Why do we remember some things throughout our lives?

A

Generally the things we remember throughout our lives are either encoded and repeated often as a child, such as a home phone number childhood adress or teacher name.

35
Q

What is the Deese-Roediger-McDermott false memory paradaigm? (Aka DRM paradigm)
(From tutorial 5)
And what are critical lures?

A

The DRM paradigm, named after the authors who first presented it, is the finding that people will invent false memories based on their potential similarity to the things exposed to the person. So, if a person is doing a memory test and they are presented with a list of words with a similar theme, such as chair, table, stool, bed, then people believe, upon recall, that they saw couch, but they didn’t. Couch in this case would be a critical intrusion??

36
Q

How do critical intrusions get produced?
(From tutorial 5).

A
37
Q

Ecker et al (2015) found WHAT effect when participants had a longer PRE-STUDY delay?

A

They found that participants performed better when they had a longer pre-study delay.
These findings are discussed in the context of interference theory. When there is a greater delay prior to learning there is essentially greater time between anything previously learned or experienced, therefore reducing potential interference from this.

38
Q

What is Inhibition Theory?

A
39
Q

What finding lead to the development of Inhibition Theory of failure to retrieve memories?

A

Anderson, Bjork and Bjork (1994) discovered retrieval-induced forgetting.
Retrieval-induced forgetting is seen when the practicing of some associations decreases ability to remember other associations with the same cue.
What Anderson et al. found was that when participants were presented with a set of categories and examplars and then were asked to practice some of those categories and exemplars (known as Rp+ items or practice items from practiced categories) when they were asked to recall exemplars from practice categories that they did not practice (known as Rp- or non-practiced items from practiced categories) they were worse at remembering these items than they were at recall non-practiced items from non-practiced categories (known as Npr items), which was essentially a control condition.
So, practising of some associations resulted in decreased memory of other associations.
Anderson et al then proposed that forgetting is due to inhibition of memories caused by retrieval of other memories.

40
Q

The initial evidence of Retrieval-Induced Forgetting is explainable via Interference Theory. What is one the predictions Inhibition Theory makes that Interference Theory does not and is this prediction reflected in the data?

A

The fact that the practicing of categories and certain exemplars leads to decrease memories of the unstudied items can be explained by interference theory by saying that the reason the unstudied items are forgotten is because there are stronger connections/associations between the category and the practiced exemplars thus introducing interference that prevents the retrieval of the unpracticed exemplars. And so, why the need for Inhibition Theory?
Well, Inhibition theory makes the prediction that items with higher competition to the practiced item or item of relevance will need to be inhibited MORE than items with less competition with the relevant item. This prediction was tested by Anderson et al. (1994). What they found was the items with higher competition were inhibited to a greater extent than items with less competition. The example used in lecture was that if the relevant item or association was fruit-banana then fruit-orange is going to be more inhibited that fruit-blueberry, because orange has a stronger association with fruit than blueberry and therefore posses more competition. They found that this was indeed the case,providing evidence for Inhibition Theory.
This phenomenon is called INTERFERENCE DEPENDENCE OF RIF (retrieval-induced forgetting).

41
Q

What is meant by interference dependence of RIF?

A
42
Q

Inhibition Theory also predicts that novel cues will be subject to RIF. This is known as the CUE INDEPENDENCE ASSUMPTION. Does the data show this?

A

Yes. There is evidence for the CUE INDEPENDENCE ASSUMPTION of Inhibition Theory.

43
Q

What is the Retrieval Dependence Theory of Inhibition Theory?

A

Retrieval Dependence assumption refers to the idea that if there is no competition at retrieval then RIF should not be observed. Anderson et al (2000) found this to be the case. Restudying does not induce RIF.

44
Q

Why is Inhibition Theory not completely accepted yet?

A

There are replication issues with some of the assumptions used to support the idea of Inhibition Theory, such as cue independence and retrieval dependence assumptions.

45
Q

What are some of the assumptions made by Inhibition Theories that are not made by Interference Theory.

A

Interference Dependence Assumption.
Cue Independence Assumption.
Retrieval Dependence Assumption.

46
Q

What are some of the key findings from Ebbinghaus’ work from the 1800s?

A

List length effect.
Spacing Effects.
Forgetting curve.

47
Q

According to a meta-analysis on memory done in 2023, what were the Laws of Memory that were identified?

A

Law of Recency.
Law of Primacy.
Law of Repetition (with spaced repetition being most useful).

48
Q

According to Interference theory, when a cue has more associations is it harder or easier to remember?

A

Harder.

49
Q

What is proactive interference according to Interference theory?

A

Proactive interference refers to the idea of old associations interfering with with new associations and preventing either encoding or retrieval.

50
Q

According to Interferene theory, what does retroactive interference refer to?

A

New associations preventing the retireval of old associations.

51
Q

In regards to people performing worse on memory tasks such as ab-cd/ab-ac paired associate tasks, can decay theory describe the findings?

A

No.
According to decay theory, the performance on ab-cd and ab-ac tasks should be the same.

52
Q

According to decay theory, why do people perform better on ab-cd tasks over ab-ac tasks?

A

Interference theory states that this occurs because there is proactive interference occuring that is impeding retrieval of the ac association over the ab association.

53
Q

Underwood (1957) challenged the interpretation of Brown-Peterson paradigm and found that forgetting was largely predicted by the number of prior trials.
What kind of interference was proposed to lead to this trend?

A

Proactive interference (perhaps also retroactive interference).

54
Q

In Underwoods analysis of the Brown-Peterson data, what did they find about forgetting trends on the first trial?

A

Almost no forgetting after 20 seconds on the first trial.

55
Q

What is the RELEASE FROM PROACTIVE INTERFERENCE effect seen in Wickens et al. (1963)?

A

When the stimulus type is changed then there is an ehancement in memory. There is no prior info to interfere with the new cue type and therefore memory is better, according to interference theory.

56
Q

According to Consolidation Theory, what happens to memories that do not move from perseveration period into consolidation period?

A

They are forgotten.

57
Q

What is one of the predictions made by Consolidation that is not supported by work done on rats using ECS?

A

One of the predictions made by consolidation theory is that if the perseveration period is interrupted then consolidation cannot occur and no memory should be present.
However this was not the case.

58
Q

Is retrieval induced forgetting worse for weak or strong exemplars of a category?

A

Strong.